I think we were better off talking about the mask. 

If any of you don't visit General TV and Media, there are two threads there for voting on whether you think Carla Gugino and Malin Akerman are hot or not.![]()
I don't get it...?Still the best joke in the movie:
![]()
--Ted
^ She's quite the looker too, but probably doesn't have enough good pics out there.
I thought Nixon's makeup was decent enough, he was a decade older than when the real one resigned. The McLaughlin parody was fun, and Sally's old makeup also worked for me, with the acting she seemed old and I didn't recognize Gugino.
I just came in to say that I thought the movie sucked, and strongly suspect the novel would too. The effects were good, the acting good, but the story is hollow, I find its nihilism unattractive. It's a quality of Alan Moore's writing tthat puts me off, and he's nowhere near as original as he thinks he is. I could do what he does - grab a bunch of characters from other stories and recast them. Blah.
The thing that gets completely lost in the film's adaptation (and the reason I pretty much hated the thing) is that humanity is worth saving, and that it really isn't humanity's fault they wound up in the situation they were in. The book features a number of characters that would simply be background fodder in any other book (a newsstand owner, a kid who reads pirate comics, a taxi cab driver and her activist girlfriend) and really develops the relationships between them. At first it seems like a completely unrelated thread (which is probably why it got cut), but it ultimately proves to be one of the book's most important points. The world is full of normal people making the best of their lives despite the fact that their leaders spend all their time in pointless posturing, despite the fact that it could all end in nuclear fire (this was written in 1986). Superheroes, in Alan Moore's Watchmen, aren't something to be glorified; they're part of the problem, and this is something that the film misses completely.Maybe there is more in the novel, and I will read it at some point. But I don't know. I'm pretty sick of the wholer "human race isn't worth saving" shit, or the idea that people have to be tricked to pull back from the brink.
I could do what he does - grab a bunch of characters from other stories and recast them. Blah.
The thing that gets completely lost in the film's adaptation (and the reason I pretty much hated the thing) is that humanity is worth saving, and that it really isn't humanity's fault they wound up in the situation they were in. The book features a number of characters that would simply be background fodder in any other book (a newsstand owner, a kid who reads pirate comics, a taxi cab driver and her activist girlfriend) and really develops the relationships between them. At first it seems like a completely unrelated thread (which is probably why it got cut), but it ultimately proves to be one of the book's most important points. The world is full of normal people making the best of their lives despite the fact that their leaders spend all their time in pointless posturing, despite the fact that it could all end in nuclear fire (this was written in 1986). Superheroes, in Alan Moore's Watchmen, aren't something to be glorified; they're part of the problem, and this is something that the film misses completely.Maybe there is more in the novel, and I will read it at some point. But I don't know. I'm pretty sick of the wholer "human race isn't worth saving" shit, or the idea that people have to be tricked to pull back from the brink.
I could do what he does - grab a bunch of characters from other stories and recast them. Blah.
Could you link to your multi-million copy selling opus? I mean if it's that easy - where is it?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.