A
Amaris
Guest
Or, maybe it will.
J.
Are you circumcised or uncircumcised?
- Thread starter Josh Kelton
- Start date
- Status
Or, maybe it will.
J.
Just in case someone hasn't mentioned it yet, it's a tad awkward to keep bringing up your young daughter in the cunnilingus and shaved pubes discussions. Just FYI.
Oh.That's understandable then. I don't think I've ever gotten to anybody first-- the other guys were always quicker.
I didn't mean their first time, I meant our first time together... although one of them it could have been their first time having anyone go down on them, but she said it wasn't...
Well, I don't know then... reflexive hesitation, I suppose.
And yet in a country like the UK where circumcision is barely practiced it's hardly considered an issue by anyone. Women don't prefer circumcised men because they simply aren't used to seeing them. In all my years of dating and knowing English people nobody has ever even raised the issue or expressed a preference and i've never heard it even discussed. I hardly think that is a coincidence
You are just having trouble looking beyond your cultural programming, it happens to all of us on various issues.
Really? Different models I assume then.
His is obviously a pump-action model that you have to cock before firing.
Unless you've been watching porn at least 4-5 hours a day since you were, I dunno, 11, then you're vastly more used to your own dick. Which is cut, unless you're really into self-hating here.I guess I don't think so - I've seen plenty of both thanks to the wonders of the internet, and the fact uncut men are becoming more and more common in porn. Even in the "golden age" of porn John Holmes, who was famous for being very well endowed, was uncut. So it's not a matter of limited exposure to me, just a preference, much like my preference for a lack of body hair on both men and women.And I think that a cut dick is hideous.It's all in what you're used to, really.
That's what I was referring to in that instance, not porn. Sorry that I didn't make it clear.
Dude, the first porn I ever saw, thanks to my finding my dad's stash, was made up mostly of stuff from the '70s, so pretty much everyone had some pretty full bushes. Not attractive in the least to me. Interestingly enough, Sharon Mitchell had a movie she was completely shaved in, and that's pretty much how I found I liked how that looked.[/quote]
Fair enough, I suppose.
I don't like it because I find it too impersonal. If I can't see my partner's face, and if our faces are more than half a body length apart, then it just doesn't feel right to me. I would imagine that's a feeling shared by a lot of women.
Oh my!
All this talk of my penis is turning me on ...
I'll be in my bunk.
Hard to tell.
I don't know, it seems pretty personal to me.
Anyway, you can make eye contact if you want to.
Hard to tell.
Quite hard ... to tell ...
Which also contains a lot of nerve endings and stuff. So even if someone was to "restore" by stretching what remaining skin they had, it wouldn't quite be a perfect substitute for their original foreskin.
Hard to tell.
Down, boys.
All this talk about elasticity reminds me of a more innocent time in my life.When I was growing up in another country, most boys (including myself) didn't get circumcised until they were in their pre- or early teens. I don't know why ... I guess it was viewed as a rite of passage to being a grown man. In fact, I didn't know of any grown-up man who wasn't circumcised. Everyone just assumed that all grown-up men were.
I'm telling you, back then when a boy reached a certain age and became more aware of "grown-up" things and started talking to his peers about sex, the issue of circumcision made those kids quite apprehensive. Imagine the horror as well as the pressure going through a young boy's mind. Any kid who had reached a certain age and was known to be uncut was ridiculed. Also, since masturbation was becoming more common, all my friends talked about how elastic one's foreskin was before he could be circumcised. Apparently, the more one jerked off, the more his member would get pliable.
And since it was a rural agricultural community, most people did not have a lot of money. The well-to-do families had their boys taken to a medical doctor to conduct the procedure (such as I did); others, however, went to a local version of a "medicine man" to do it for them for a small fee. As you can imagine, it was often painful and bloody and could be prone to infection.
Well, I'm glad I got through that part of my life just fine. I personally don't believe in subjecting infants or toddlers to mutilation.
The lady did say she was curious how it looked, not what it contained. And I quite familiar with this, I have one installed after all.
^^^Standard equipment.
I'd rather it not be done at all, except for religious reasons ...
I'd rather it not be done at all, except for religious reasons ...
I'd say the same thing, except for medical reasons instead of religious^^^Standard equipment.
I'd rather it not be done at all, except for religious reasons ...
I'd say the same thing, except for medical reasons instead of religious^^^Standard equipment.
I'd rather it not be done at all, except for religious reasons ...
That too of course. Other than those reasons, i feel that there's no reason for it.
Well you won't find out from this poll, that's for sure.
Worldwide, uncircumcised is more common.
But this board's membership is heavily USA-based, where circumcision is common, which is likely to give a errenously high circumcised penis count.
Hardly surprising. See that all the time.
- Status
Similar threads
