• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Masturbation

What the hell kind of violent masturbating do you do that wears out your penis?

People can make their hands red and raw from washing them too much. You don't think that masturbating very frequently can produce the same effects?

If you have this problem I'd suggest some KY

How's Kentucky going to help? Seems to me that would only make it worse. Sure, they gots them horses and where there are horses there are bound to be sheep...

lanolin - gotcha! you're one smart motherfucker!
 
People can make their hands red and raw from washing them too much. You don't think that masturbating very frequently can produce the same effects?

Very true. If you wash your hands twenty times a day you'll get chapped hands.

Who masturbates twenty times a day?

(It's rhetorical!)
Even washing your hands 20 times a day wouldn't make them "raw". That's only once an hour or so. That's why then invented hand lotion. :)
It put's the lotion on the skin...or else it gets the hose agaaaiinn...
 
They do? Most men's organs would be utterly worn out if they masturbated everyday (hormonal teenage boys aside).

Really? (checks himself out proudly) It's good to be exceptional. :techman:

Count me as another one who's wondering why Sheep is so fragile. ;)

We need an experiment to determine if my "worn out" statement has any merit. Three groups of daily masturbators doing it for a month, differing only by (1) doing it in the shower, (2) not in the shower without KY, (3) not in the shower with KY.

Any volunteers? I'm not sure I want to hear the results. :p
 
Women do it less because they are motivated/aroused by touch more than imagery (as in, a light touch or a sensual kiss will be a turn-on, not the sight or thought of a male penis). A teenage boy need only think of something arousing or see a cute girl and he'll sit uncomfortably in study hall until it passes. Luckily for men, as they get older, this is easier to control-- but the "urge" or "feeling" from said imagery remains (hence, why men masturbate more often... it doesn't take much to get a healthy man going).
 
How's Kentucky going to help? Seems to me that would only make it worse. Sure, they gots them horses and where there are horses there are bound to be sheep...

ashleyjuddwv9.jpg


taraconnersz1.jpg
 
Women do it less because they are motivated/aroused by touch more than imagery (as in, a light touch or a sensual kiss will be a turn-on, not the sight or thought of a male penis). A teenage boy need only think of something arousing or see a cute girl and he'll sit uncomfortably in study hall until it passes. Luckily for men, as they get older, this is easier to control-- but the "urge" or "feeling" from said imagery remains (hence, why men masturbate more often... it doesn't take much to get a healthy man going).

(laughs) Please cite your sources.
 
Really? (checks himself out proudly) It's good to be exceptional. :techman:

Count me as another one who's wondering why Sheep is so fragile. ;)

We need an experiment to determine if my "worn out" statement has any merit. Three groups of daily masturbators doing it for a month, differing only by (1) doing it in the shower, (2) not in the shower without KY, (3) not in the shower with KY.

Any volunteers? I'm not sure I want to hear the results. :p

I can provide data for 2) So far, so good.

:p
 
Women do it less because they are motivated/aroused by touch more than imagery...

This has been debunked a long time ago. Women have exactly the same response to arousing visual imagery. The Hite Report for example would say they are merely unaware of it on a conscious level, and that this is because women learn to routinely ignore sexual responses from an early age, and very often will misunderstand the signs (as female arousal is not so very obvious). In any case, the fact remains, if you show a man and a woman the same arousing visual material, their responses will correspond pretty exactly. The same thing with women not being able to enjoy quickies, due to delayed arousal and all that, load of bollocks....
 
Last edited:
Women do it less because they are motivated/aroused by touch more than imagery...

This has been debunked a long time ago. Women have exactly the same response to arousing visual imagery. The Hite Report for example would say they are merely unaware of it on a conscious level, and that this is because women learn to routinely ignore sexual responses from an early age, and very often will misuderstand the signs (as female arousal is not so very obvious, it's easy to do). In any case, the fact remains, if you show a man and a woman the same arousing visual material, their responses will correspond pretty exactly. The same thing about women not being able to enjoy quickies, due to delayed arousal and all that, load of bollocks....
I can confirm via a female friend of mine. The subject came up some time and she herself refuses to believe that men somehow are hornier the women, seeing as she herself claims she think a whole lot about sex and the such. As for the quickies bit, the poor gal actually has some issues with finishin quicker then most guys she's with and then more often then not becomes quite bored with the whole thing :lol: I myself think that the guys must be doing it wrong if she gets bored, but oh well.
 
It's why women are ashamed to admit that they look at porn. They are not supposed to even though they would get the same reaction as men.
 
With that I gotta add, the aformentioned friend watches porn. She prefers the kind actually made for women though, but she watches it. Yes she is several parts of awesome.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top