How is the title, which is an accurate description of the focus of the game, derogatory?
It simply isn't. The people getting offended by it
are the prejudiced ones.
Chemahkuu said:
The root cause of many of these problems, gaming industries too concerned with money than good games.
What a tedious, old and boring argument. Of
course the gaming industry is concerned with money. It
needs money. That's how capitalism works.
It doesn't mean there isn't
plenty of room for good, innovative titles. Even Electronic Arts - gaming's great boogeyman - puts a lot of money into fresh IPs like Spore, Mirror's Edge and Dead Space.
And, a great number of the tentpole games are bloody good regardless. The three games I was psyched about 2008 for are all sequels, and all pretty destined to make shitloads of cash (GTA4, Fable 2, Fallout 3). The fact that they will each earn their publishers enough money to build a secret lava-moated evil fortress on the dark side of the moon does not detract from their quality.
Tell me, do you only ever buy independently published titles?
I mean all sexism aside it looks like a crappy game anyway.
What fucking sexism? Seriously, where is it? Is Oblivion sexist because all the women in it are plain, ugly and boring conversationalists? Is Soul Calibur sexist because it's women are scantily clad, have ridiculously unrealistic busts and carry phallic weapons? Does that go for Lara Croft aswell?
Is the gaming industry one big chauvinistic conspiracy or do some people need to lighten the fuck up?