• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Feminists upset over "Fat Princess" video game

To my extraordinary shock, Kotaku actually said something insightful on the subject.

So what's the alternative for the princess? Should she not be fat, because thin girls are cute and funny while fat ones are not? Would it have been better to make her a typical, idealized female? Or must we be so sensitive that we are no longer allowed to rescue the princess, as we have done in our fairy tales for centuries, at all?
Ultimately, though, wouldn't removing the fat girl, or the issue of obesity, from the game because they bring too many issues into play be precisely the wrong message to send to women?

This is proof that people over there only read headlines and not the actual blog stories. Which is fine, because I hardly ever read their stories either... but I'm not paid to be a "responsible journalist" (game journalism, HAH!).

At FeministGamers, the writer basically suggested that the "flag" could be a chest and that the defending team could have filled the chest with rocks or whatever to make the chest heavier.

While I don't necessarily agree with their premise, I find the misogyny surrounding the story and the authors fairly disappointing. But then again, the fact that "fag" and "nigger" are basically common epithets in the gaming community... I probably shouldn't be surprised.
 
Pro or con, I can't believe anyone is just plain STUPID enough to create a game like this.

I'd say a few execs missed a few meetings, especially at the conceptual and naming levels.

--Ted

Not a gamer, eh? While the game's title is questionable, the game itself looks fun as hell.

You can bet no one would have a problem if this was "Fat Prince".

TWICE as many people would be upset because it would still piss off BOTH genders.

--Ted
 
They could call this game "Mr Coaster is a fat old bastard" and I wouldn't give a crap in the least. Everybody's so easily offended by everything. I probably wouldn't have given this game a second thought before, but now I'm going to play it incessantly and talk about how silly fat princesses are.
 
While I don't necessarily agree with their premise, I find the misogyny surrounding the story and the authors fairly disappointing. But then again, the fact that "fag" and "nigger" are basically common epithets in the gaming community... I probably shouldn't be surprised.

That's a ridiculously huge leap of logic there. And since it was in fact the Feminist Gamer article that brought up the point about "cuteness" in the first place (and of course in reality making the game about a generic chest makes the game, well, generic) and the fact that the thing I linked to on Kotaku was actually written by a female and the artist who did all the concept work on the game is a female I really have no idea where you pulled out the accusation of misogyny from. Or maybe you need to actually read the articles before you accuse the people who wrote them of not reading the source material :p

The point on Kotaku is totally and completely valid. There has never been any outcry about a game where you rescue a a princess that conforms to society's idea of beauty. Peach, Zelda, etc etc etc. But all of a sudden the princess in question is overweight and it's misogyny? Please. Games should not have to be afraid of having characters in them that are not the ideal vision of beauty constructed by our scoiety and that's what the outcry is about... not that she's a princess but that she's an overweight princess. To make your accusation even more unfounded, in the game you can customize your player character to be either male or female.

Also part of the gaming mechanic is that if you don't feed her on a regular basis, she becomes thin and vunerable to being taken again. Generally chests don't get lighter if you stop putting things in them.
 
Pro or con, I can't believe anyone is just plain STUPID enough to create a game like this.

I'd say a few execs missed a few meetings, especially at the conceptual and naming levels.

--Ted

There are many interesting PSN titles presently available and in development. So far as I'm aware, only Fat Princess has its own thread here. I'd say the name has worked out well for them.

Pretty much, whatever you say about the name, it definitely stands out, and as far as the concept goes, it's pretty unique. Additionally, from what I hear it's a pretty solid game as well.

Is there anything "wrong" with the concept? That's subjective, but then you have to consider most games have you blowing people away half the time.

EDIT: I did want to point out how the game can be sexist though...other media (like movies) is consumed by all types of people, but video games are PRIMARILY played by young males. Coincidentally enough, overweight women go though the hardest part of their lives when they are exposed daily to...young males.

In other words, I give it good odds that this game will mostly be played by young males who often make fun of young women in the real world.

If adults played this game I wouldn't have much problem with it. Adults are adults. They can keep their private lives to themselves and their mouths shut at work. It's teenagers,however, that are going to go to school the next day and call someone a 'fat cow' to their face, so it does seem wrong to make a game like this that's aimed at that age-range of people.

It's kind of like selling booze to 9-year olds. It's not that booze is wrong, but I feel this is a very wrong medium to be exploring this.

The age of the average male gamer these days is 33 years old. Fat Princess will also most likely carry with it an "M" rating, for Mature, which is the videogame equivalent of a "R" rating. Videogames aren't just for kids anymore, and the industry has been reflecting this.

Videogames as a medium also have as much right as film and literature to explore whatever topics the creators desire in whatever fashion the creators desire as long as they don't violate any laws.
 
While I don't necessarily agree with their premise, I find the misogyny surrounding the story and the authors fairly disappointing. But then again, the fact that "fag" and "nigger" are basically common epithets in the gaming community... I probably shouldn't be surprised.

That's a ridiculously huge leap of logic there. And since it was in fact the Feminist Gamer article that brought up the point about "cuteness" in the first place (and of course in reality making the game about a generic chest makes the game, well, generic) and the fact that the thing I linked to on Kotaku was actually written by a female and the artist who did all the concept work on the game is a female I really have no idea where you pulled out the accusation of misogyny from. Or maybe you need to actually read the articles before you accuse the people who wrote them of not reading the source material :p

The point on Kotaku is totally and completely valid. There has never been any outcry about a game where you rescue a a princess that conforms to society's idea of beauty. Peach, Zelda, etc etc etc. But all of a sudden the princess in question is overweight and it's misogyny? Please. Games should not have to be afraid of having characters in them that are not the ideal vision of beauty constructed by our scoiety and that's what the outcry is about... not that she's a princess but that she's an overweight princess. To make your accusation even more unfounded, in the game you can customize your player character to be either male or female.

Also part of the gaming mechanic is that if you don't feed her on a regular basis, she becomes thin and vunerable to being taken again. Generally chests don't get lighter if you stop putting things in them.

I wasn't talking about Kotaku, I was talking about the commenters.
FeministGamers had to shut down comments because of trolls, from what I understand.

Look at the shit N'Gai Croal got when he said "black people didn't work on [Resident Evil 5]" (it was funny to see Capcom point out that there are black people who work there). He basically got called, to censor myself, an oversensitive black man by the throbbing gaming masses.

Like I said, I'm not arguing the point because - first of all, I don't really care either way. But as the writer at FeministGamers says, "We're gamers too". And people seem to lose sight of that when they resort to delightfully witty comments as "stupid fat bitch".

God, I remember at 1up when Jane Pinckard called out Guitar Hero 3 for tarting up the female characters. Then people called her various names because she talked about using the trance vibrator from Rez as a masturabation tool, suggesting that she was being hypocritical for exploiting herself while calling out the Neversoft guys for exploiting the female body for their game.

It's just kind of depressing to see, is all. But again, this is the Internet and I'm not all that surprised.
 
Fatties need to get a life and STFU. It is their fault that they are fatties in the first place. They just want others to feel guilty about it.
 
I wasn't talking about Kotaku, I was talking about the commenters.
FeministGamers had to shut down comments because of trolls, from what I understand.

My mistake then. So I'll simply say that those comments aren't representative of any sort of normative behavior of the gaming population... as you say, it's the internet and some people just enjoy being loudmouth trolls and the sane people tend to make up the silent majority.
 
Probably. I mean, message board denizens are always a small, non-representative sample when it comes to the real world population. But the level of discourse is, in general, framed within that white straight male demographic.

I find it sad that message boards have to ban certain words because people can't stop themselves from using them. And even when the boards do, they go out of their way to type out "f49" to avoid the censor.
 
I think these so called feminists should actually look for a more worthwhile cause to fight for - there are still many injustices against women that are far far worse than this game.
 
Pro or con, I can't believe anyone is just plain STUPID enough to create a game like this.

I'd say a few execs missed a few meetings, especially at the conceptual and naming levels.

--Ted

Not a gamer, eh? While the game's title is questionable, the game itself looks fun as hell.

You can bet no one would have a problem if this was "Fat Prince".

TWICE as many people would be upset because it would still piss off BOTH genders.

--Ted

I don't see anyone getting pissed off except the feminists in the original article and a few people who are WAY too sensitive, all of whom really need to pull the trees out of their asses.

As a member of the beer-belly community, my self-esteem won't be irreparably damaged if someone calls me fat.
 
This is actually false. 40% of gamers are female and 20% of gamers are teenage boys.

This is true, the average age of gamers increases every year and the percentage of women playing games has grown a great deal in the last few years thanks mainly to Nintendo and the growing popularity of casual gaming and games on mobile phones.

Here's a source on the numbers. 65% of US households play games, the average age of a gamer is 35 and women over 18 represent 33% of gamers with males under 17 representing 18%.

So the "games are for kids" argument really doesn't fly. The assumption that only teenage boys play games is in many ways more representative of a stereotype then Fat Princess is... I don't think there's a stereotype that obese women like to be used as flags in CTF which is basically all the game is.


Hmmm, I wonder where exactly these supposed female gamers are.

Because I don't think I've even seen a female pick up a videogame controller let alone have the distinction of being a "gamer".

Are they counting solitaire or something?

On the flip side, nearly all of my male friends have a video game system of some type.
 
I think these so called feminists should actually look for a more worthwhile cause to fight for - there are still many injustices against women that are far far worse than this game.
Most of us are. We can't do it twenty-four hours a day, though, and in our down time, some of us like to play video games. Some of us like to blog. Some of us do both. And some of us, when we are checking out upcoming video games and see something stupid like this, blog about it. And then we go to bed, and wake up the next day and go back to tackling the important shit again.

You act as if a human being can only ever do one thing ever.
 
Hmmm, I wonder where exactly these supposed female gamers are.

Because I don't think I've even seen a female pick up a videogame controller let alone have the distinction of being a "gamer".
That might say more about you than it does about women gamers. :p
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top