• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship Platform Lifespans

There was one from a parallel universe where everything was tiny at the beginning of the last season Lower Decks. I would’ve forgotten it if I hadn’t double-checked.

Ah. I was referring to the use of the studio model or CGI model during the Berman era.
 
i believe there's a WWII minelayer that drachinifel or ryan szymanski (curator of battleship new jersey) did a tour of, that got coverted to being a personal yacht at some point after the war, that they were in the process of reconverting to her wartime config.

it actually seems to be pretty common in museum ships to "backdate" them, or rather, pick a point in their history to represent, unless they went straight from commission to museum status. if they had a short active span, then they went into mothballs, a good chunk of their equipment getting taken to use on fresh ships. and if they had a long service life, they had a lot of changes, and not all of them uniform...

it's not too unreasonable to think that the STIV Saratoga got refit into a similar configuration as the later one, then later decommissioned and a fresh ship in the same class and configuration built...

Many warbirds were converted into VIP transports. Who doesn't want to b in a plush A-26 or B-23 doing 300 kts while your competitor is riding a DC-3?

If I'd been around then, a surplused PT boat with three Allisons would have been awful tempting.
 
Doesn't count, since we only saw part of what looked like an engineering hull. That's not enough proof to say that it was a full Constitution II class.

Same time, we never see another ship with that particular hull anywhere else in the franchise, that I’m aware of.
 
Same time, we never see another ship with that particular hull anywhere else in the franchise, that I’m aware of.

Correct; there has never been another canonical design which has a Constitution II secondary hull.
 
The JTVFX fan video on the Battle of Wolf 359 has a recreation of that scene of the Enterprise going through the debris. Interestingly, while this version has a modified Constitution II present at the battle they have that specific hull as a Federation II-class hull (TMP refit of a Federation-class dreadnaught).
 
The JTVFX fan video on the Battle of Wolf 359 has a recreation of that scene of the Enterprise going through the debris. Interestingly, while this version has a modified Constitution II present at the battle they have that specific hull as a Federation II-class hull (TMP refit of a Federation-class dreadnaught).

That is their personal interpretation, though there is no on screen evidence to support.

Is there any on screen evidence that the Federation II exists?
 
Well, hero ships are always weirdly distributed compared to guest ships that don't have the same narrative obligation to be distinctive. We didn't see a second Sovereign-class ship until 2022. We've only ever seen three Intrepid-classes, and one of those was only allowed for logistical reasons since DS9 needed a guest ship with more rooms than could be reasonably redressed from the Defiant.
Yeah, I think the Defiant and Galaxy are the most seen hero ship classes. More Galaxies than Defiants.
 
That is their personal interpretation, though there is no on screen evidence to support.

Is there any on screen evidence that the Federation II exists?

Not a TMP refit version of it, no. The only time the Franz Joseph version appeared on screen was the outline of it on a display in TWOK, and those little models in Guinan's bar in PIC. And a dreadnought with the name USS Entente NCC-2120 (taken from FJ's manual) was heard in radio chatter in TMP, but it wasn't seen on screen so it could have looked different from the FJ version.

The ironic thing is that they could probably design a TMP version of the dreadnought and wouldn't get in trouble with FJ's estate, because although it would be the same configuration, it wouldn't be the same design.
 
Well, we did see an FJ Dreadnought model in Picard, and Entente’s registry in TMP.

I am willing to entertain a notion that Entente perhaps was at Wolf 359….but Stargazer with four nacelles was its better.

Excelsior gets the latest tech, and Hathaway gets simpler, proven tech.

A Federation II could have separated its saucer and escaped—presumed destroyed.

The saucer has its own nacelle after all….making it a destroyer equivalent on its own.

I might have had the secondary hull ram the cube on autopilot.
 
Yeah, I think the Defiant and Galaxy are the most seen hero ship classes. More Galaxies than Defiants.

They used the Galaxy class CGI model in the DS9 Dominion War fleet scenes because the Enterprise-D had already been destroyed and they had the Sovereign class Ent-E, so the audience would not have been confused and thinking they were seeing the Ent-D. If the Ent-D had not been destroyed in Generations, I doubt the DS9 VFX people would have used the Galaxy model.
 
They used the Galaxy class CGI model in the DS9 Dominion War fleet scenes because the Enterprise-D had already been destroyed and they had the Sovereign class Ent-E, so the audience would not have been confused and thinking they were seeing the Ent-D. If the Ent-D had not been destroyed in Generations, I doubt the DS9 VFX people would have used the Galaxy model.

They did use a Galaxy-class model in “The Jem’Hadar”. A few months before it was destroyed in Generations.
 
They did use a Galaxy-class model in “The Jem’Hadar”. A few months before it was destroyed in Generations.

Yes, but they specifically mentioned in dialogue that the ship was the Odyssey. I was referring to the random Galaxies in the Dominion war fleets.
 
USS Odyssey was a Galaxy-class for the "Worf Effect" with the new Dominion. Bring the strongest known starship in the Federation and have it clobbered in a fight. Much like having the new alien or godlike being toss Worf over the railing on the Enterprise bridge to show just how strong they are.
 
USS Odyssey was a Galaxy-class for the "Worf Effect" with the new Dominion. Bring the strongest known starship in the Federation and have it clobbered in a fight. Much like having the new alien or godlike being toss Worf over the railing on the Enterprise bridge to show just how strong they are.

Basically this. It was before the E-D was destroyed so fans were seeing the Galaxy class as THE most powerful ship in Starfleet. Having one being taken out showed what a treat the Dominion was. And, let's be honest, even before the suicide run the Odyssey was getting thrashed.
 
I have to admit that one of the things that makes me a little crazy with Star Trek, particularly with the modern era, is the inconsistent depiction of how lasting and durable various Starship classes / platforms are. Now, I know a lot of this is driven by production reasons. TNG re-used various designs and classes (Miranda, Oberth, Excelsior) to take advantage of existing studio models and save on budget. Modern Trek did it because the designers wanted to put their own spin and creativity on things. But, in-universe I am not sure it makes much sense.

In modern times, naval vessels and aircraft are built to last 50 or more years. In the United States, nuclear powered aircraft carriers are designed for 50 years of service. Fourth generation aircraft, like the F-15, F-16 and F-18 have been upgraded, re-purposed, and re-imagined so that they have remained useful since the late 1970's / early 1980's when they entered operation (and you could argue the F-14 could have been similarly upgraded and re-purposed). The B-52 bomber has been in service since 1955.

So, when I see platforms like the Excelsior class and Miranda class in service for 80 years in-universe, to me that makes sense. You'd expect these platforms to be designed with refit and reuse in mind. And, much onscreen evidence points to that. Bridge modules look different, even external modifications point to ships being updated or repurposed. The Constitution-class was around for a long time, and probably could have been continuously upgraded and developed (is the Constitution the F-14 Tomcat of the Trek universe??).

But, in more modern versions of Star Trek, it looks like the generation of Starships that belonged to the same generation as the Galaxy-class (Galaxy, Nebula, Sovereign, Intrepid, etc) are all extremely short-lived. Heck, Picard S3 implies that the Galaxy-class is completely outdated by this time, only 35 years after their initial launch. For a ship that was designed for extended missions of 10-12 years, this seems pretty ridiculous. And you barely (of ever) see Nebula, Intrepid, or Sovereign classes. Just 25 years prior to PIC, the Sovereign and Intrepid classes were brand new and represented the cutting-edge of Starship tech.

Instead, we've now had an endless stream of "Enterprises" with new letters (the -E lasted a few years until Worf somehow screwed that up, the -F is some random design from a video game, and the -G is a rename of the Titan from S3). And the Titan looks like a starship designed 3 generations ago.

Anyway, sorry for the rant, but I guess I'm admittedly a bit of a starship nerd, and this kind of stuff always drives me crazy.
I'm inclined to agree with much of what you said. I recall reading in a Trek ship magazine (and elsewhere) that the Galaxy-class had an expected lifetime of a hundred years. This shouldn't be too surprising, since we have real-life examples of warships serving for decades (I think the real USS Enterprise served for more than 50 years).

Despite this, Starfleet does seem to cycle through ship classes quickly, especially in the later eras. It's a shame.
 
The Borg invasions, the Dominion War, and the Voyage of the Voyager, likely resulted in a lot of new tech for Starfleet and reasons to use said tech as rapidly as possible.
 
The Borg invasions, the Dominion War, and the Voyage of the Voyager, likely resulted in a lot of new tech for Starfleet and reasons to use said tech as rapidly as possible.

Absolutely, but why design new ships all the time? Integrate new tech in existing platforms, refitting ships that are out there or add to ships being build.
I understand the Vesta, for example. She was designed because Starfleet realized that the stress of slipstream travel was not something most current designs could handle, it needed a specific shape. Sure. But new weapons, shields, sensors, advancement in warp technology like better cores and coils, could all be installed on existing Galaxy classes or ones being build.

From a production point of view, I get it. New series, new movies, new designs. People want to see cool new starships. But in universe....
I'm still toying with the idea of a fanfic set right after Nemesis, exploring at the edge of known space with a Galaxy class starship that is updated with the latest tech. Because that just makes sense to me really.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top