• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Starship Platform Lifespans

The thing is, most uses of the Reliant, Excelsior and Oberth models were originally envisioned as other, newer vessels in TNG:

USS Tsiolkovsky: Was meant to be a brand-new science vessel commissioned the same year as the Enterprise-D.

USS Fearless: Was meant to be the first appearance of Andrew Probert's Ambassador class.

USS Lantree: Was meant to be a newer very small supply ship with a crew of only 26 people.

USS Brattain: Was meant to be a newer small science vessel built in the 2330s with a crew of only 35 people.

USS Bozeman: Was meant to be a TOS Constitution class starship (not technically a 'newer' vessel, but a new model would have had to have been built for it.)

USS Raman: Was meant to be a new science vessel contemporary to the Enterprise-D (no model was ever built for it, but the Encyclopedia makes it an Oberth.)

USS Pegasus: Was supposed to be a newer ship commissioned only five years before the Enterprise-D.


So they weren't good at being upgraded so much as they were just the go-to models because the producers were too cheap to build new ones.
yes but I am speaking more theoretically in terms some sort of in-series rationale. If we go to real reasons, there will always be budget and design language reasons (some folks really loved Carrozzeria Bertone, in the 80s. Ent-D's chairs came right out of a Lancia Stratos. I digress.)

I used to find it annoying that they did reuse those models so much, especially Oberth, a ship I just find silly and ugly, but now I enjoy the idiosyncrasy of this massive star-fleet that makes many new ship designs will still leaving old ones in service and even building new copies of the old designs alongside the new ones.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top