• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

News Season 2 will be the last (show cancelled)

What about it makes it conclusively "bad writing?" Just because you don't like it doesn't make something inherently bad. It just means you didn't like it.

What was the purpose of writing a character that puked glitter. Glitter that looks exactly like the stuff we make for parties etc. It wasn't funny. Why did they write it in? What message was it meant to convey? If it was humor it failed.
 
Last edited:
What was the purpose of writing a character that puked glitter. Glitter that looks exactly like the stuff we make for parties etc. It wasn't funny. Why did they write it in? What message was it meant to convey? If it was humor it failed.
It was literally so they could depict a character drunk and puking without actually having to show puke and getting a higher rating than they want for the show.

Yes it was silly. It probably set up future stories where they could convey severe sickness or somesuch. But I would not even remember it now if not for this thread.
 
What was the purpose of writing a character that puked glitter. Glitter that looks exactly like the stuff we make for parties etc. It wasn't funny. Why did they write it in? What message was it meant to convey? If it was humor it failed.
What do you mean, what was the purpose? It was meant to be humorous, of course. Doesn’t mean you or anyone has to find it particularly funny, but that is obviously why they included the gag. And I’m sorry, but why would we expect it to convey any sort of “message”? What a weird and arbitrary bar to set. It absolutely doesn’t need to go any deeper than both conveying that Darem is an alien with a body that functions differently, and to make the viewer chuckle. Explaining a joke rarely makes it any funnier, but the humor of it lies in the fact that it subverts the expectation of a character’s vomit looking gross. And what was the “message” that Kirk getting buried under a pile of Tribbles was meant to convey? Or Worf smashing Geordi’s lute, Kirk saying “A little too much LDS” or Odo moving the bowl instead of the whisk in order to whip a soufflé? Sometimes a gag is just a gag. And an alien character vomiting a reflective substance is not as universe-breaking as some people want to make it out to be.
 
I have no outrageous opinions towards glitter
Futurama-Fry.jpg
 
I'm kind of surprised at the backlash the glitter vomit has gotten. When I first saw it, I just shrugged it off as some sort of silly alien thang, which Star Trek has shown dozens of in any given series, and moved on from there. I then come online and see it's the one thing everyone's complaining about with everyone contorting themselves into fits saying "well, this episode is told from SAM's perspective, maybe the glitter vomit is just artistic license or something." I actually cheered later when we saw the glitter vomit in the "real world" so to speak, because now the haters would have to accept it really is some alien thing. But apparently, people just can't accept this for some reason. Maybe if Terry Matalas had included glitter vomit in Picard S3 the majority of those currently complaining would suddenly consider it the most brilliant thing EVER!?
Even Frakes didn't seem to like it.
All Frakes said was that it "seemed absurd." Given the context of his comments, I did not get the impression he meant that as a negative. But hey, if it gives you comfort to think one of the Statesmen of the Trek franchise agrees with you, I obviously won't be able to convince you otherwise here.
 
Everyone hated Raffi in the first two seasons of Picard until old Tezza came along with season 3 and regressed the character and suddenly everyone wants her in a new show. So if he had done glitter vomit people would probably have had no issues.
 
What was the purpose of writing a character that puked glitter. Glitter that looks exactly like the stuff we make for parties etc. It wasn't funny. Why did they write it in? What message was it meant to convey? If it was humor it failed.
Remember how Star Trek has these things called aliens from strange new worlds? It’s showing what would be a normal occurrence, but inverting it or changing the detail so it’s not wholly mundane. It’s a grace note amongst the symphony for color and tone, not the aria itself.
 
Remember how Star Trek has these things called aliens from strange new worlds? It’s showing what would be a normal occurrence, but inverting it or changing the detail so it’s not wholly mundane. It’s a grace note amongst the symphony for color and tone, not the aria itself.

The glitter was dumb. It just wasnt hitting the funny at all.
I'm kind of surprised at the backlash the glitter vomit has gotten. When I first saw it, I just shrugged it off as some sort of silly alien thang, which Star Trek has shown dozens of in any given series, and moved on from there. I then come online and see it's the one thing everyone's complaining about with everyone contorting themselves into fits saying "well, this episode is told from SAM's perspective, maybe the glitter vomit is just artistic license or something." I actually cheered later when we saw the glitter vomit in the "real world" so to speak, because now the haters would have to accept it really is some alien thing. But apparently, people just can't accept this for some reason. Maybe if Terry Matalas had included glitter vomit in Picard S3 the majority of those currently complaining would suddenly consider it the most brilliant thing EVER!?

All Frakes said was that it "seemed absurd." Given the context of his comments, I did not get the impression he meant that as a negative. But hey, .
if it gives you comfort to think one of the Statesmen of the Trek franchise agrees with you, I obviously won't be able to convince you otherwise here.

Absurd wasnt a ringing endorsement of it. They did the glitter joke twice it wasnt funny either time. I think I can deduce what it was all about.
 
The glitter was dumb. It just wasnt hitting the funny at all.



Absurd wasnt a ringing endorsement of it. They did the glitter joke twice it wasnt funny either time. I think I can deduce what it was all about.
Maybe not for you, but some seem just fine with it.

Again, none of this is bad writing just because it didn’t work specifically for you and you alone.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top