• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Trek's future according to Paramount's new owners...

Only because Usenet wasn't that populated in 1987. TNG was NOT well liked by fans; and DS9 in 1993 was worse.
On that note I stumbled across Google's usenet archive the other day while looking for old Magic: the Gathering talk, and checked out rec.arts.startrek. First post I came across from around 1990 was someone saying "people here are stuck in the past and just find anything to complain about with TNG". Made me laugh since you could swap "TNG" for "SFA", post it here, and nobody would notice it was written 36 years ago.

Archive is here if anyone wants to check it out for a laugh; you can filter by date range at the top to see posts made when TNG/DS9 launched.
 
On that note I stumbled across Google's usenet archive the other day while looking for old Magic: the Gathering talk, and checked out rec.arts.startrek. First post I came across from around 1990 was someone saying "people here are stuck in the past and just find anything to complain about with TNG". Made me laugh since you could swap "TNG" for "SFA", post it here, and nobody would notice it was written 36 years ago.

Archive is here if anyone wants to check it out for a laugh; you can filter by date range at the top to see posts made when TNG/DS9 launched.
There was also:

net.startrek (one of the earliest groups circa 1982)
alt.startrek
rec.arts.startrek.fandom
rec.arts.startrek.info

(Yes, I have an old archive of text files and I posted to all those groups for many years.)
 
Only because Usenet wasn't that populated in 1987. TNG was NOT well liked by fans; and DS9 in 1993 was worse.

Usenet at the time was awash with negativity (I know I posted a lot of it WRT TNG in 1987.) ;)

It was a different time, and even in letter columns the editors chose a equal smattering of 'Good' VS 'Bad' and only they knew which 'side' sent more letters, but they tried (most times) to print 'both sides'.

With social media and the Internet as it exists today - every idiot has an effective Bullhorn to the world. :shrug:
Negativity has always existed.

You just now have to choose to ignore it.
 
Any time you look at reviews of anything you ought to bear in mind that people who are dissatisfied with a product/service/experience/event are more likely to take the time to express themselves online.
 
Any time you look at reviews of anything you ought to bear in mind that people who are dissatisfied with a product/service/experience/event are more likely to take the time to express themselves online.
A sales training course I took last century (late 90s 😉—needed to supplement income while in grad school and part time teaching) referenced a few studies that showed, on average, people who liked an experience typically told 3 other people, while those who didn’t like an experience told 11 other people. I doubt much has changed in the interim.
 
A sales training course I took last century (late 90s 😉—needed to supplement income while in grad school and part time teaching) referenced a few studies that showed, on average, people who liked an experience typically told 3 other people, while those who didn’t like an experience told 11 other people. I doubt much has changed in the interim.
This was still taught when I did sales in the 2000s, and what is emphasized by current businesses.
 
Any time you look at reviews of anything you ought to bear in mind that people who are dissatisfied with a product/service/experience/event are more likely to take the time to express themselves online.

That's why I always look for the negative reviews for a product I intend to buy on Amazon or a service I intend to hire people for.
 
What's up with that weird photo in the article?

Looks like odd looking playing cards with the main TNG cast and then suddenly next to Picard is movie-era Kirk -- with a flipped image.
 
Laughed at Rod's "things will get better... not that they're bad!" framing, especially since his definition of "better" is having "something good to watch".

Regardless of the subjective quality of recent shows, it would be fascinating to know what the mood is behind the scenes right now - SFA doesn't seem to be going beyond two seasons, SNW is over with its truncated fifth season, and Year One doesn't seem entirely likely to get greenlit. Maybe some vague analogues with the final days of the Berman era.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top