• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Fandom never changes…

Or grocery store staff could just you know leave people the fuck alone but I guess we don't get to live in that world anymore
 
Or grocery store staff could just be allowed to protect their stock and property from moonbats stalking the aisles and obfuscating their faces from the security cameras, which is an instant red flag for anyone in the commercial retail industry with half a brain. :vulcan:
 
oddly enough they don't seem to give a shit about "obfuscating faces" or "protecting their stock" when they're hopping up and down screaming hysterically in apoplectic rage because someone's nose is poking out of the top of a mask :shrug:
 
I sometimes wonder if it’s because for most of us, fandom first hit us when we were something like 13 and thought this stuff really mattered. (Yes, at some level science fiction does matter, but you know what I mean.). And though we grow older after that, to a certain degree we’ve imprinted.
I think that's true for some of us to a great extent. I know that I attribute some of my detachment toward movies like Superman 1978 and big franchises like Star Wars and the revived Star Trek to having been an adult in my twenties when they were first released.
 
There is also the theory that you can "mark the baby". My parents went to see Star Wars in a drive in theater about two days before I was born. I was born about two weeks early. There are parts in the film that I can "feel" when they play (music mostly near the second half of the film). Star Wars has always been a part of my life.
 
There is also the theory that you can "mark the baby". My parents went to see Star Wars in a drive in theater about two days before I was born. I was born about two weeks early. There are parts in the film that I can "feel" when they play (music mostly near the second half of the film). Star Wars has always been a part of my life.


So you're saying "The Force is strong with you" basically?
 
Well. That article has definitely put me off from seeing "Empire Strikes Back". I'll save my $2.69 for "The Gong Show" thank you very much!
The irony of all of that is I personally found ESB to be the best of the three in the OT. Best written, best acted, and really some amazing cutting-edge VFX for the time. In may ways I still find it the best overall, including being compared to the PT and ST, and I know many others out there have felt the same way over the years.

I guess some folks either don't like or understand the A/B/A model of storytelling, as the darker "B" part usually shows our heroes down and out, necessitating the third installment to allow them to bounce back and win. I mean, shit, it's even in the title, "The Empire Strikes Back", (spoiler alert right? :lol:) It's one of the oldest writing styles out there, but many felt taken aback and by surprise by that, thinking the protagonists should always win no matter what.

I dunno.... YMMV, I guess. :shrug:
 
Or grocery store staff could just be allowed to protect their stock and property from moonbats stalking the aisles and obfuscating their faces from the security cameras, which is an instant red flag for anyone in the commercial retail industry with half a brain. :vulcan:
I know I'd definitely be keeping an eye on a person if I saw them come into the store where I work dressed like that. Unless it was the weekend of Phoenix Fan Fusion (our local comic-con) or a Star Wars release day, then I might at least be a little more forgiving.
And yes there were a few times people came in in their full costumes on PFF weekends when I worked at Wal-Mart.
The irony of all of that is I personally found ESB to be the best of the three in the OT. Best written, best acted, and really some amazing cutting-edge VFX for the time. In may ways I still find it the best overall, including being compared to the PT and ST, and I know many others out there have felt the same way over the years.

I guess some folks either don't like or understand the A/B/A model of storytelling, as the darker "B" part usually shows our heroes down and out, necessitating the third installment to allow them to bounce back and win. I mean, shit, it's even in the title, "The Empire Strikes Back", (spoiler alert right? :lol:) It's one of the oldest writing styles out there, but many felt taken aback and by surprise by that, thinking the protagonists should always win no matter what.

I dunno.... YMMV, I guess. :shrug:
Isn't it pretty much standard for the middle part of any story to be the darkest part?
 
Isn't it pretty much standard for the middle part of any story to be the darkest part?
I’ve sometimes imagined what it would be like to do the opposite: a trilogy in which the first part is tragic and downbeat and ends in seeming tragedy, the second part is brighter and happier and ends on a hopeful note, and the last part utterly destroys that by going even darker than Part I and ending the trilogy with a colossal crescendo of doom.

I’m a lot of fun at parties.
 
I’ve sometimes imagined what it would be like to do the opposite: a trilogy in which the first part is tragic and downbeat and ends in seeming tragedy, the second part is brighter and happier and ends on a hopeful note, and the last part utterly destroys that by going even darker than Part I and ending the trilogy with a colossal crescendo of doom.

I’m a lot of fun at parties.
Beowulf is kind of that way.

So is "The Graduate" in some way.

There are films like that, usually structured either with a U or a inverted U style. The inverted U is closer to what you described and is considered the classic tragedy.
 
You'd think a fandom of a genre about the future wouldn't cling so desperately to the past.

OTOH a lot of people don't care about the past at all (if it's more than 15 years old, with 2 or 3 exceptions, it's irrelevant). I think not at all surprising that those who care a lot about something from long ago would not be particularly open to thinking that something released right now or within last 5 years would be as good as the best, would tend to be particularly focused on something decades old as the best in big part because of thinking styles and products got a lot worse after.

I guess some folks either don't like or understand the A/B/A model of storytelling, as the darker "B" part usually shows our heroes down and out, necessitating the third installment to allow them to bounce back and win. I mean, shit, it's even in the title, "The Empire Strikes Back", (spoiler alert right? ) It's one of the oldest writing styles out there, but many felt taken aback and by surprise by that, thinking the protagonists should always win no matter what.

A lot of fans still haven't come around to liking dark middle chapter in Lucas's other big trilogy, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, thought that was pretty much just bad wrong idea/type, liked and still like a lot Last Crusade being kind of feel-good remix/remake of the original film, and with that director Spielberg himself has tended to agree, to pretty openly distance himself from it and to say that that they and he went too far with that.
 
Almost the entire online ecosystem of Galactica TOS fandom has now almost disappeared (there are some old sites out there that are purely '90s-era), but even at their peak, they were a tiny fraction of everything dedicated to Star Trek. Still, I read some mind-blowing things on their boards. They were truly convinced that Galactica was a phenomenon comparable to Star Trek and couldn't understand why they didn't make a direct sequel to the original series.

A good article on the subject

So Spew We All: Toxic Fandom’s Beta Test in BATTLESTAR’s Fandom

Thus, Battlestar’s fandom became the blueprint for what is now called “toxic fandom.” A beta-test for what one can now readily see in the larger spheres of greater Stars: Trek and Wars.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top