• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The General Knight Rider thread.

Oh, that brings up another one -- how are those two flaps supposed to not rip right off at the speeds K.I.T.T. was going in SPM? Molecularly-bonded flaps, too? Come on.
 
The general fans understanding wasn't as good as those who worked in the industry.

Most fans weren't thinking about things like AeroDynamics back in 1980's for cars.

TV fans? Maybe not. Car fans? Hell, yeah, they were. Of course people who like fast-moving vehicles care about aerodynamics. I went looking for Popular Mechanics articles from the period, picking 1985 at random, and got this on my first try:


Also, the word "aerodynamics" is not capitalized. It's not a brand name.
 
TV fans? Maybe not. Car fans? Hell, yeah, they were. Of course people who like fast-moving vehicles care about aerodynamics. I went looking for Popular Mechanics articles from the period, picking 1985 at random, and got this on my first try:
I'm talking about average fans understandings, not Car Fans.
We all know the average Auto Enthusiast would know this.

The average fan now-a-days are more informed on the basics than before.


Also, the word "aerodynamics" is not capitalized. It's not a brand name.
I know it's not, that's me being idiosyncratic and just doing it because I can.
I know the capitalization rules, I just stopped caring to follow them when I think certain words need extra emphasis.

Same tech that keeps the nacelles attached to the pylons of the TOS Enterprise. ;)
Plot Armor!

Well, the nerd in me knows that's not even the same thing. ;-)
By the Power of Plot Armor.
Good Structural Engineering be damned.
 
I'm talking about average fans understandings, not Car Fans.

Dude... It's Knight Rider. It's a show about a cool car. Obviously there's a lot of overlap in the Venn diagram.

You're also forgetting that Super Pursuit Mode had to be built by auto customizer George Barris. If you're claiming that one of the most famous auto customizers in the world didn't understand auto aerodynamics, you really need to rethink your assumptions from the ground up. Barris surely knew it had terrible aerodynamics, but that didn't matter, because of course its superspeed was faked.
 
Barris surely knew it had terrible aerodynamics, but that didn't matter, because of course its superspeed was faked.
That's the point, the needs of the show, trumped Reality & IRL Physics / AeroDynamics.

They did what was good for the "Rule of Cool" Trope instead of what was Realistic/Believable.

That's fine for entertaining kids & those who don't know any better, but don't expect that to go without critique once the fans grow up and see reality for what it is and how their 'Cool In-Show Ideas' never could've been realistic in any sense.

Just like AIRWOLF never could've gone Super-Sonic, that was just a conceit of the show for the "Rule of Cool".

Many modern fans are trying to find a better balance between Realism & Story Telling with their shows while still being fanciful enough with what is portrayed on screen.
Blending Realism in as close as possible. The more Realistic, the better.
 
Many modern fans are trying to find a better balance between Realism & Story Telling with their shows while still being fanciful enough with what is portrayed on screen.
Blending Realism in as close as possible. The more Realistic, the better.
This is the main reason why every KR reboot is doomed.
 
This is the main reason why every KR reboot is doomed.
Honestly, if they try to adapt a few features from other Super Car shows and not to try going too insane on CGI heavy features like they did with KR 2008, it would've been better.

VIPER had a few good ideas that can be borrowed like the deployable weapons pod on the port & starboard sides below the door, have a deployable drone for scouting (that's the easy part given modern day drone tech).

The Armor can use a little revising.

The Pop-Up lights can be replaced with Pop-Up Weapons Station.

There are so many cool "Car Gadgets" from either James Bond or any number of Super Car TV/Shows to borrow that you can outfit the car reasonably from the get go.
 
That's the point, the needs of the show, trumped Reality & IRL Physics / AeroDynamics.

Yes, that's my point. Saying it was done because aerodynamic science was less understood in the 1980s is ridiculously ignorant, condescending, and insulting. We understood the science perfectly well back then, thank you very much, but Knight Rider was not a show that cared in the slightest about science.


Many modern fans are trying to find a better balance between Realism & Story Telling with their shows while still being fanciful enough with what is portrayed on screen.
Blending Realism in as close as possible. The more Realistic, the better.

Stop insulting your elders. Plenty of us in my generation valued realism in science fiction, which is why we were so drawn to Star Trek as the one SF show of the era that made any effort at it at all. But nobody who wanted realism would look to Knight Rider for it. Stop talking as if it's the template by which the entire era should be judged. It was at the low end of the intelligence spectrum by design.
 
Yes, that's my point. Saying it was done because aerodynamic science was less understood in the 1980s is ridiculously ignorant, condescending, and insulting.
Yes, the Technical People & Car Enthusiasts would understand, no problem with that statement.

We understood the science perfectly well back then, thank you very much, but Knight Rider was not a show that cared in the slightest about science.
The average fan base who was targeted to watch Knight Rider wouldn't be part of that group.
Especially the younger audience who followed it, which I was a part of.
The science behind how all the things worked wasn't even remotely considered at that time.
The only thing that mattered was the cool on screen action & story.

Stop insulting your elders. Plenty of us in my generation valued realism in science fiction, which is why we were so drawn to Star Trek as the one SF show of the era that made any effort at it at all.
But you're a rare breed, the Venn Diagram between Trekkies & Knight Rider Fans during the time that it aired couldn't have been that big.

But nobody who wanted realism would look to Knight Rider for it.
Of course not, it was a action show with fantastical elements for a very young & casual audience.
It worked, it has its cult following because of it.

Stop talking as if it's the template by which the entire era should be judged. It was at the low end of the intelligence spectrum by design.
I guess you can say that about all the "Super Vehicle" shows of the era, they were fun Action Romps for a very casual audience.
 
That's my point. You keep generalizing about the entire audience as if Knight Rider were the standard for all shows.
It kind of was, it set a trend with "Super Vehicle" shows of that era that many copied.

Look at Air Wolf, Blue Thunder Movie/TV, Street Hawk, VIPER, Thunder in Paradise.
All the major "Super Vehicle" Shows/Movie had a similar formula and had various levels of success because of it.

e.g. Street Hawk having a Motorcycle capable of Top Speeds of 300 mph was fantastical for that era (1985).
The Fastest Production Motorcycle of that time had Top Speeds of (151-158 mph)
The Current Fastest Production Motorcycle has a Top Speed of (205 mph).

A Custom Land Speed Record for Motorcycles can get up to the 300+ mph range, but that's far more recent and usually one off custom vehicles.

The Casual Audience would find that to be very cool and Street Hawk to be awesome.
To any Motor Cycle enthusiast, they would be scoffing at the 300 mph top speed since it couldn't have been done at the time.
 
Last edited:
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top