Oh, that brings up another one -- how are those two flaps supposed to not rip right off at the speeds K.I.T.T. was going in SPM? Molecularly-bonded flaps, too? Come on.
The general fans understanding wasn't as good as those who worked in the industry.
Most fans weren't thinking about things like AeroDynamics back in 1980's for cars.
KITT lost the Molecular Bonded Shell by the time he gained SPM.Oh, that brings up another one -- how are those two flaps supposed to not rip right off at the speeds K.I.T.T. was going in SPM? Molecularly-bonded flaps, too? Come on.
Same tech that keeps the nacelles attached to the pylons of the TOS Enterprise.Oh, that brings up another one -- how are those two flaps supposed to not rip right off at the speeds K.I.T.T. was going in SPM? Molecularly-bonded flaps, too? Come on.
Same tech that keeps the nacelles attached to the pylons of the TOS Enterprise.![]()
I'm talking about average fans understandings, not Car Fans.TV fans? Maybe not. Car fans? Hell, yeah, they were. Of course people who like fast-moving vehicles care about aerodynamics. I went looking for Popular Mechanics articles from the period, picking 1985 at random, and got this on my first try:
I know it's not, that's me being idiosyncratic and just doing it because I can.![]()
Popular Mechanics
Popular Mechanics inspires, instructs and influences readers to help them master the modern world. Whether it’s practical DIY home-improvement tips, gadgets and digital technology, information on the newest cars or the latest breakthroughs in science -- PM is the ultimate guide to our high-tech...books.google.com
Also, the word "aerodynamics" is not capitalized. It's not a brand name.
Plot Armor!Same tech that keeps the nacelles attached to the pylons of the TOS Enterprise.![]()
By the Power of Plot Armor.Well, the nerd in me knows that's not even the same thing. ;-)
I'm talking about average fans understandings, not Car Fans.
That's the point, the needs of the show, trumped Reality & IRL Physics / AeroDynamics.Barris surely knew it had terrible aerodynamics, but that didn't matter, because of course its superspeed was faked.
This is the main reason why every KR reboot is doomed.Many modern fans are trying to find a better balance between Realism & Story Telling with their shows while still being fanciful enough with what is portrayed on screen.
Blending Realism in as close as possible. The more Realistic, the better.
Honestly, if they try to adapt a few features from other Super Car shows and not to try going too insane on CGI heavy features like they did with KR 2008, it would've been better.This is the main reason why every KR reboot is doomed.
That's the point, the needs of the show, trumped Reality & IRL Physics / AeroDynamics.
Many modern fans are trying to find a better balance between Realism & Story Telling with their shows while still being fanciful enough with what is portrayed on screen.
Blending Realism in as close as possible. The more Realistic, the better.
Yes, the Technical People & Car Enthusiasts would understand, no problem with that statement.Yes, that's my point. Saying it was done because aerodynamic science was less understood in the 1980s is ridiculously ignorant, condescending, and insulting.
The average fan base who was targeted to watch Knight Rider wouldn't be part of that group.We understood the science perfectly well back then, thank you very much, but Knight Rider was not a show that cared in the slightest about science.
But you're a rare breed, the Venn Diagram between Trekkies & Knight Rider Fans during the time that it aired couldn't have been that big.Stop insulting your elders. Plenty of us in my generation valued realism in science fiction, which is why we were so drawn to Star Trek as the one SF show of the era that made any effort at it at all.
Of course not, it was a action show with fantastical elements for a very young & casual audience.But nobody who wanted realism would look to Knight Rider for it.
I guess you can say that about all the "Super Vehicle" shows of the era, they were fun Action Romps for a very casual audience.Stop talking as if it's the template by which the entire era should be judged. It was at the low end of the intelligence spectrum by design.
But you're a rare breed, the Venn Diagram between Trekkies & Knight Rider Fans during the time that it aired couldn't have been that big.
It kind of was, it set a trend with "Super Vehicle" shows of that era that many copied.That's my point. You keep generalizing about the entire audience as if Knight Rider were the standard for all shows.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.