Same.
Is it time to put Star Trek to rest?
- Thread starter Dar70
- Start date
The Connie III would be perfectly fine... in 2295.
The Connie III is a reworking of a fan design (Shangri-La Class) that is seemingly inspired by another fan design (Belknap Class), which is inspired by a refit of the original Enterprise.
Which is emblematic of a big problem with a lot of recent Trek and much of pop-culture these days - it's all photocopies of photocopies.
Which is emblematic of a big problem with a lot of recent Trek and much of pop-culture these days - it's all photocopies of photocopies.
Replicative fading.
Dr. Kate Pulaski let us know in 1989 the dangers of copying...
Dr. Kate Pulaski let us know in 1989 the dangers of copying...
I like the G, but I prefer the D, even though my favorite is the A.
The only ones I don't like are the F and the J.
Enough letters for you?
The only ones I don't like are the F and the J.
Enough letters for you?
Even though I want Legacy, I'll take your version of The Lost Years too!
I'd do it For All Mankind style and have every season in a different decade. Cover the whole thing, from the 2290s to the 2350s. That way, anyone who wants it closer to TUC and anyone who wants it closer to TNG can get something.
i hate this thing where a longstanding, hopeful, idea for the future and it's believers are suddenly garbage for no reason other than musk touched it. especially when many of the people saying so, at least the public-facing ones, were either avid supporters of the idea, or of musk's involvement (or in general), or both, for years.
Last edited:
Not sure those are good examples. Tom was in jail, and Wesley's fate had nothing to do with Starfleet. He was a Starfleet washout.
Dropout. Wesley dropped out. There is a difference.
They aren't exclusive. His grades were slipping and he felt lost.
I'm quite a talented surgeon. I could fix that hump.
James T. and George S. Kirk? The LaForge family? Of course what's the difference between nepotism and "my family has been in Starfleet for generations"?
What hump?
nepotism is when you are given your position or breaks because of your family's positions, usually directly by them. following family tradition and going into the same field is not automatically nepotism.
I have to agree, because logically the E should have been a Galaxy class. The E, as shown, should be regarded as an aberration.
Why?
Because she wasn't typical Starfleet. As in; not being an explorer.
Because a Galaxy class starship, is designed to go out for decades, without worrying the Admiralty back home.
Because writing scripts where the and most powerful ships in the Fleet are too easily targeted and destroyed
This shouldn't be possible. Not for 24th century technology .
The Probert C, is in this same category.
The Enterprise-C of 'Yesterday's Enterprise ', a bit more problematic. This is due to the Phaser Strip load out.
Why?
Because she wasn't typical Starfleet. As in; not being an explorer.
Because a Galaxy class starship, is designed to go out for decades, without worrying the Admiralty back home.
Because writing scripts where the and most powerful ships in the Fleet are too easily targeted and destroyed
This shouldn't be possible. Not for 24th century technology .
The Probert C, is in this same category.
The Enterprise-C of 'Yesterday's Enterprise ', a bit more problematic. This is due to the Phaser Strip load out.
Huh?
With whom are you agreeing?
The three Galaxy class starships which are confirmed destroyed were destroyed under extraordinary circumstances. The Yamato fell victim to an advanced alien computer virus. The Odyssey had another ship ram into it and the Enterprise D was destroyed because the enemy had visual access to everything the chief engineer could see. Not really anything 24th century technology could have done to prevent that.
Well, okay, Geordi probably should have replicated another Visor when he got back, but putting that aside, there was otherwise no preventable measures which could have been taken.
Similar threads
