Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?Thank you for this; I was trying to figure out when Sisko had ever been pissy at a rape victim.
Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?Thank you for this; I was trying to figure out when Sisko had ever been pissy at a rape victim.
Personally I don't think it's a competition. Other's mileage may vary.Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?
Too be clear, I'm not claiming one could decide between the two ... or should.Personally I don't think it's a competition. Other's mileage may vary.
Picard unwillingly joined a cult and then killed Sisko's wife before being rescued from the cult and deprogrammed
Basically, two people traumatized in different ways by the same event. Somehow one is more worthy of sympathy from the audience than the other?
I'm a bit baffled as to why Sisk's being accused of being "unreasonably pissy" or showing "irrational hostility" when that's the point. As the Prophets themselves say, Sisko has existed at the moment of his wife's death and hasn't been able to move past it.
This seems akin to criticizing "Measure of a Man" for spending so much time dwelling on the question of whether Data should have rights.
It's an attempt to at least frame it from Sisko's perspective, as opposed to 'Sisko hates someone because they got raped', which does not describe the situation at all.I think that's a much less apt metaphor, because cults and cult deprogramming are very real human phenomena, and literal mind control is not, so "unwillingly joined a cult" does not adequately convey the horror of Borg assimilation.
It's grossly unprofessional to speak in a gruff manner?but no right to berate Picard for something that wasn't remotely his fault. Not to mention, it's grossly unprofessional.
IIRC, Andre Bormanis let down the TNG writers by telling them the actual Apollo 13 astronauts were significantly more sedate than their movie counterparts. If professionalism were something accurately portrayed in Trek, there would be little dialogue left. A lot is exaggerated to make for dramatic and entertaining television.It's grossly unprofessional to speak in a gruff manner?
Is it logical
Right? I'm not sure what rights you are referring to. There is no hierarchy of suffering. Michael Piller wrote both episodes, and he decided that his hero needed to express his pain to the face that represented it. From Family to this episode, Picard was considered rto have been healed ( in the TV sense, of course). If Picard could take it in stride, so can the fans.Of course not, but, like I said, Sisko has every right to seek therapy for his trauma, but no right to berate Picard for something that wasn't remotely his fault. Not to mention, it's grossly unprofessional.
This is arguably one of the most facile, useless and just plain wrong opinions about this show I've ever come across.[...] If he was really feeling guilty about the dead enemy agent and the man the Klingons were going to execute anyway, his skin isn't nearly tough enough for him to be a captain during wartime.
Reading back that passage, it seems to poster is arguing that someone in uniform should have no compunction to kill.This is arguably one of the most facile, useless and just plain wrong opinions about this show I've ever come across.
Horrifying.Reading back that passage, it seems to poster is arguing that someone in uniform should have no compunction to kill.
It took me a few years but now its the best. Still, I hate Voyager. I've tried but I hate it. Its like Gilligan's Island in space. Stupid premise that a capt would strand the crew that far away for some species.I've long been interested in checking out DS9, because I've heard from a lot of smart people that it’s the best-written and most complex Trek series, as well as the most serialized, and, hey, who doesn’t love a properly serialized sci-fi war epic.
That said, from the handful of eps I’ve seen, I don’t think I fundamentally like the show very much. I don’t like the drab look of the station, and, nothing against the cast, I don’t find the characters particularly appealing, either. The Ferengi seem uniformly obnoxious by design, Odo’s smooth face is off-putting (and I like Auberjonois from Boston Legal), and the rest seem like various shades of unremarkable (except for Worf, of course, because Worf’s awesome). What’s more, I’m not hugely jazzed at the idea of a Trek series ending with its captain ascending to a kind of godhood.
Then there’s the series’ much-balleyhooed crown jewel, “In the Pale Moonlight.” I’ve seen it twice, and I think Michelle Erica Green got it right the first time around; the scenario isn't nearly as edgy as the episode seemed to think:
I must say that I think the flashback-via-diary structure for this episode was a mistake, because I had a really hard time not laughing at Avery Brooks' earnest, emotional monologues in Sisko's personal logs.[...] If he was really feeling guilty about the dead enemy agent and the man the Klingons were going to execute anyway, his skin isn't nearly tough enough for him to be a captain during wartime.
So, given the above, I was interested to come across this here series guide (in the form of a very tall image file) by one “Spectrum,” rating each episode by both quality and narrative importance. Two key observations:
- Of the episodes deemed as having Major importance, only two (“Sons and Daughters” and “His Way”) get a quality rating of less than Good. (The reviewer rates “In the Pale Moonlight” as Great; take that as one will.)
- Of the episodes rated Great, only six (“Duet,” “Necessary Evil,” “The Visitor,” “Trials and Tribble-ations,” “Far Beyond the Stars,” “It’s Only a Paper Moon”) are deemed to have no narrative importance, and only one ("The Wire") is deemed to have minor importance.
So, I wonder if a Niner skeptic like me, were I ever to really explore the show, wouldn’t be best advised to only watch the 40 or so episodes (some of them two-parters) rated as having Major importance. Maybe if I loved those episodes, I’d be inspired to go back on catch up on those I missed, but please, no suggestions to simply grit my teeth and watch them from start to finish – sorry, but that’s a no-go for now.
Any other thoughts? Is Spectrum’s list of episodes of Major importance missing any big ones? Is the guide missing any Great episodes that aren't of at least mild overall importance?
I never cared for Voyager and I'm amazed by the people who really love it.It took me a few years but now its the best. Still, I hate Voyager. I've tried but I hate it. Its like Gilligan's Island in space. Stupid premise that a capt would strand the crew that far away for some species.
It's grossly unprofessional to speak in a gruff manner?
IMHO, the whole point of that moment with Picard was to show that Sisko was a flawed human being. Someone who‘s become irrational because of the grief he’s experienced. They wanted to contrast Sisko with the “evolved” Picard and make sure that viewers understood that Sisko is a different kind of series lead.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.