• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 3x03 - "Shuttle to Kenfori"

Hit it!


  • Total voters
    130
I mean that Scotty was older than many of the other characters on TOS. He wasn't young like Chekov, Sulu, and heck even older than Kirk (I believe).

So, Scotty is 38 at this point in SNW and would be in his 40s during TOS going by the info you quoted. And that fits with what I'm saying. He's no spring chicken just learning the ropes!

My main point is that I don't buy Scotty being at this flustered, unsure of himself point right now. Sure, it's possible. I get it. It makes a nice story arc tying into how he is in TOS. But it doesn't ring true to me at least.
Depends on when he started his career. He could have joined Starfleet as a mature student, everyone does not have to attend SFA at age 18 e.g TOS McCoy
 
Depends on when he started his career. He could have joined Starfleet as a mature student, everyone does not have to attend SFA at age 18 e.g TOS McCoy
Well sure. Hence why I said, "Sure, it's possible." But it still doesn't ring true to me. YMMV.

It makes a neat story arc and I'm sure that's why they're doing it.
 
That's exactly what I was going to say.

It's no different than people in their 30s or 40s going to college for the first time.
Exactly, especially in a universe where beings live way pass 100 and probably retire as centenarians.
I expect people to have at least three long careers before they move to Retireville.
In the 23rd century, 100 is the new 50!
 
Last edited:
That's exactly what I was going to say.

It's no different than people in their 30s or 40s going to college for the first time.
I see it a lot in my field.

It's difficult for people to comprehend the vastness of space!
Indeed, yes, so familiar reference points are needed to keep it relatable. The immense size isn't just difficult, it's overwhelming and promotes disengagement.
 
If the UFP has a population in the trillions than losing 6 ships for an galactic organisation would not be a lot.
A lack of understanding of scale has been a general problem in the Disco verse writers room since the beginning.

So much so that they had to retcon the losses from the Klingon War in Strange New Worlds so they could given characters a proper war background.
 
Hell it was one of the Trekkiest Treks ever to Trek.
It did make me wonder how well the TOS cast would have performed if something similar had happened.

Nichelle could sing very nicely. Not quite so sure about Shatner and Nimoy, but I'm completely bereft of knowledge about the rest of the cast and their musical accomplishments or abilities.

Even Family Guy parodied Shat's singing.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

I think I get his point, though. TOS was intentionally vague, and it worked because everything from speeds to dates to distances were never specified.

The later series suffered under the weight of accumulated continuity; they couldn't help it, writers started to nail down specifics which ironically made the remaining vagueness stick out (to a certain type of fan.) It's why B&B could put the line in "Broken Bow" about "Neptune and back in six minutes" – because by that time, somebody somewhere had kept track of how fast these ships were "supposed" to be, and that line was, apparently, "accurate." And then the ship gets to Qo'nos in 4 days and the math doesn't work at all.

They would have been better off if nobody knew where Qo'nos was, or how fast warp 5 was supposed to be.
 
I think I get his point, though. TOS was intentionally vague, and it worked because everything from speeds to dates to distances were never specified.

The later series suffered under the weight of accumulated continuity; they couldn't help it, writers started to nail down specifics which ironically made the remaining vagueness stick out (to a certain type of fan.) It's why B&B could put the line in "Broken Bow" about "Neptune and back in six minutes" – because by that time, somebody somewhere had kept track of how fast these ships were "supposed" to be, and that line was, apparently, "accurate." And then the ship gets to Qo'nos in 4 days and the math doesn't work at all.

They would have been better off if nobody knew where Qo'nos was, or how fast warp 5 was supposed to be.
And the irony with that is that they did have a "why" in the series bibles that made those inconsistencies make sense.

That why just never found it's why into the actual show.
 
I think I get his point, though. TOS was intentionally vague, and it worked because everything from speeds to dates to distances were never specified.

The later series suffered under the weight of accumulated continuity; they couldn't help it, writers started to nail down specifics which ironically made the remaining vagueness stick out (to a certain type of fan.) It's why B&B could put the line in "Broken Bow" about "Neptune and back in six minutes" – because by that time, somebody somewhere had kept track of how fast these ships were "supposed" to be, and that line was, apparently, "accurate." And then the ship gets to Qo'nos in 4 days and the math doesn't work at all.

They would have been better off if nobody knew where Qo'nos was, or how fast warp 5 was supposed to be.
Indeed. And even if the writers bibles have it if it isn't in the show it doesn't help the audience members.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top