Minutia. Meaningless minutiae.
First, it's the Flagship of the Federation and commonly used to host various dignitaries. Pikes quarters make perfect sense, especially when you consider the ship having a crew only in the 200s.As for the ship it was not necessary to make Pikes Quarters as large as Ten forward
If you're referring to the "turbolift funhouse "that was only seen in a Short Trek, I would imagine that was simply a reuse of a digital asset. It hasn't been seen since and it's best ignored.or a turbo interior the size of the Enterprise D
By the next iteration, the fans from 2000s will be the longtime fans.There is no way that will happen.. Especially with long time fans. We will all be dead within the next 20-30 years. I know I won't be waxing nostalgia at 80 years old about the kurtzman era. Plus the new shows don't even get three seasons worth of episodes. Which means they will never have the impact the other shows had. SNW will have only two lousy seasons worth of episodes......with half of those being comedy bits....![]()
Doesn't matter if it's not a competition. I'm just saying Stars wars has been tighter and more consistent. As for Spock and relationshipsYes. That's their job. Roddenberry did it with TMP, Meyer did it with TWOK and TUC, and so on.
Who cares? It's not a competition. Star Wars is deeply entrenched fantasy storytelling using science fiction stylings and veneer. It's not Star Trek and isn't trying to be. The competition game is pointless.
This. The changes have always been there. Just now they're treated as signs of ill will be the producers.
So no relationship what do ever?
Which is why Spock was insulted as a sensible chuckle moment at the end of episodes?
Nope. Not at all. If it was I wouldn't be watching it at this point. It's very TOS.See I think SNW feels a lot like TNG
By the next iteration, the fans from 2000s will be the longtime fans.
Since we're going "anecdotal" When I'm 80 (in 14 years) I'm sure I'll still like SNW.
Not sure why that means no chapel relationship. Assumptions abound.Doesn't matter if it's not a competition. I'm just saying Stars wars has been tighter and more consistent. As for Spock and relationships
I never said he never had any. He denied himself one with Leila I think 6 years before THIS SIDE OF PARADISE. Then of course he had one with her when the spores influenced him. Then there was Zarabeth of course and again he was influenced by the time travel and reverted back to his ancestors more violent and hedonistic behaviors...![]()
Star Wars...consistent?Not sure why that means no chapel relationship. Assumptions abound.
Star Wars is only consistent on aesthetics and even the The Phantom Menace looked nothing like a Star Wars movie. Rogue One upended lore for poor characters. ROTS ruined Obi-Wan Kenobi.
It's not the most consistent unless the shallow look of things is all that matters.
Empire Strikes Back: Luke and Leia kiss twice.Star Wars...consistent?in the Obi-Wan Kenobi series we find out Obi-Wan saved 8-year-old Leia Organa. and they spent a couple weeks together.
Amazing that she doesn't mention that in her personal message to him which R2-D2 plays in the original 1977 Star Wars film.
Yep very consistent.. oh wait...
But all the switches are in the right place.Empire Strikes Back: Luke and Leia kiss twice.
Return of the Jedi: Leia has "always known" her and Luke were siblings. She also remembers her mom.
First, it's the Flagship of the Federation and commonly used to host various dignitaries.
Rots did not ruin OBI Wan Kenobi...Not sure why that means no chapel relationship. Assumptions abound.
Star Wars is only consistent on aesthetics and even the The Phantom Menace looked nothing like a Star Wars movie. Rogue One upended lore for poor characters. ROTS ruined Obi-Wan Kenobi.
It's not the most consistent unless the shallow look of things is all that matters.
It could be the flag ship under Pike's command and not under Kirk's.I don't recall TOS ever establishing that the NCC-1701 was the Federation flagship. That was first mentioned about the Enterprise-D in TNG. Which is another concept they took from that show rather than being consistent with TOS.
Phantom Menace looked incredibly Star Wars. Rogue One barely had any returning characters in for them to have their lore upended. Revenge of the Sith was a great movie for Obi-Wan Kenobi.Star Wars is only consistent on aesthetics and even the The Phantom Menace looked nothing like a Star Wars movie. Rogue One upended lore for poor characters. ROTS ruined Obi-Wan Kenobi.
It's not the most consistent unless the shallow look of things is all that matters.
Nothing fits in The Phantom Menace to the rest of the aesthetic. It sticks out like a sore thumb and you can't convince me otherwise.Rots did not ruin OBI Wan Kenobi.......ROTS is actually my favorite Star Wars film. The aesthetics from the prequels are right on when with the previous films. I dont see what they got wrong.
In tpm its 20 years before. We have to remember we are dealing with Naboo and Courscant and the Senate. Not the rebels or the Empire. Tattooine was well done and spot on as well.
Oh I loved Rogue one as well.![]()
Not that they ever use the terminology for flag ship right.It could be the flag ship under Pike's command and not under Kirk's.
Star Wars...consistent?in the Obi-Wan Kenobi series we find out Obi-Wan saved 8-year-old Leia Organa. and they spent a couple weeks together.
Amazing that she doesn't mention that in her personal message to him which R2-D2 plays in the original 1977 Star Wars film.
Yep very consistent.. oh wait...
Doesn't really matter if TOS said it or not. SNW said it's the Flagship, so it's the Flagship. Considering the reverence towards the NX-01, I'm perfectly fine with The Enterprise always being the Flagship, if there's one currently in service. It retroactively pays respect to the NX-01, and I think that's great.I don't recall TOS ever establishing that the NCC-1701 was the Federation flagship. That was first mentioned about the Enterprise-D in TNG. Which is another concept they took from that show rather than being consistent with TOS.
Starfleet is weird like that.Not that they ever use the terminology for flag ship right.
They were on a break!!!!!Spock cheating on his betrothed
I think it was also seen in S2, E1 of DSCFirst, it's the Flagship of the Federation and commonly used to host various dignitaries. Pikes quarters make perfect sense, especially when you consider the ship having a crew only in the 200s.
If you're referring to the "turbolift funhouse "that was only seen in a Short Trek, I would imagine that was simply a reuse of a digital asset. It hasn't been seen since and it's best ignored.
He was having an emotional affair with Chapel long before the break...They were on a break!!!!!
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.