If it walks like a holodeck and quacks like a holodeck...It functions like the holodeck. It's canon to TOS unless one wants to pick and choose.

If it walks like a holodeck and quacks like a holodeck...It functions like the holodeck. It's canon to TOS unless one wants to pick and choose.
Well, I was mainly joking on that point. I don't take canon that seriously to begin with. I'm in it to be entertained.
I can see the Environmental Belts ending up being established that they had a very limited lifespan due to their high power requirements.
Perhaps it was found that they tend to burnout faster in harsher environments and so their use became very limited and the standard spacesuit lasted much longer in a wider variety of environments.
Also, from what we've seen, it appears that Star Fleet preferred that their starship crews mostly avoid actually landing on and exploring planets that weren't Class M.
![]()
They're Redshirts. If there's an exploding rock, they'll find it.Perhaps the belts caught fire - dangerous to redshirts and dry planets.
I dont really see a problem with that. I'm not dragging it out of Doctor Who or anything, it's all still Star Trek.Again, you're pulling examples of a tech established in other shows as brand new. The "limit" will be different for each fan. So there will never be a hard fast line that can't be crossed. For me the limit is what is shown in TOS/TAS. SNW for the most part is using modern takes on that. They've struck the right balance so far.
How dare you nitpick! You must enjoy it without question.I enjoy nitpicking star trek canon especially visual and tech canon. Star wars has done a far superior job with their vusual and tech canon.
Come to think of it Data and Geordi built temporal environmental arm bands in tng. Maybe they got the idea from the environmental belts.
Again, they're extreme examples. As "but what about?" examples tend to be in most arguments.I dont really see a problem with that. I'm not dragging it out of Doctor Who or anything, it's all still Star Trek.
I dont really see a problem with that. I'm not dragging it out of Doctor Who or anything, it's all still Star Trek.
As other people have mentioned, it doesn't stop other species from having it years before the Federation. But since there's no hard fast line, I guess that puts a line under the topic.
How dare you nitpick! You must enjoy it without question.![]()
How dare you nitpick! You must enjoy it without question.![]()
Agreed. If it's nitpicking from enjoyment, then ok, I get that. But, we haven't even seen the episode and "it's non canon!" arguments are on the table because of no context clips from a trailer.No one ever said enjoy it without question. I said give it a chance and see what they are actually going to do before jumping to conclusions.
A holographic humanoid isn't that extreme, i'm pretty sure we're going to see one in SNW. Nor is storing a small piece of federation equipment in a transporter buffer. I mean, M'Benga did it to his daughter, it can't be that extreme.Again, they're extreme examples. As "but what about?" examples tend to be in most arguments.
A new fan would find it challenging, for sure. I think the visual canon argument opens up a can of worms thats too often opened for any rational discussion, but I agree with a lot of what you said.Lol. I really enjoy nitpicking. I examine all the details. I really think SNW could have done a better job with tech and visusl canon. I would not think a new fan of star trek would go from SNW to TOS and think "Wow these shows flow so well together TOS definitely feels like a sequel to SNW."
They could have updated the tos enterprise interiors by keeping them the same size and even overall look but given the walls the porcelain shine, updated the winky blinkies to be actual screen savers (like they did on the enterprise in a mirror darkly), kept the cage uniforms and jackets(those aged well) and kept the bridge abd quarters the same size. They could have also update computer graphics. With those changes everything would have been shiny and sparkly and look more updated and at the same time be much closer to canon.
We've seen holo-humanoids in TOS already (That Which Survives). Scotty stored himself and one other person in a transporter buffer in the 23rd Century. So SNW wouldn't be doing anything "extreme" there. TOS also has high functioning androids. But you're reaching for 24th Century plus tech in your examples. it what I presume is an attempt at "gotcha!"A holographic humanoid isn't that extreme, i'm pretty sure we're going to see one in SNW. Nor is storing a small piece of federation equipment in a transporter buffer. I mean, M'Benga did it to his daughter, it can't be that extreme.
If it's extreme by what Trek traditionalists would consider TOS standards, then fair enough. I wouldn't say its that extreme for SNW. It's not long after the Red Angel suit, after all.
Nah, no "gotcha". I'm not sure what there is worth getting a "gotcha" over.We've seen holo-humanoids in TOS already (That Which Survives). Scotty stored himself and one other person in a holo buffer in the 23rd Century. So SNW wouldn't be doing anything "extreme" there. TOS also has high functioning androids. But you're reaching for 24th Century plus tech in your examples. it what I presume is an attempt at "gotcha!"
Scotty stored himself and one other person in a holo buffer in the 23rd Century.
Yeah had holo on the mind.You mean transporter?
I'm hoping for tons of fun
This is clear and blatant trolling and I will notify the mod over you.I'd suggest that people wait and see
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.