Thanks! It's always nice to be here!First,good to see you takingpart in this discussion, Lynx.
And for whatever everoyone has to be paired off, I don't think so. But I think that Seven should be paired off well, to prevent her from baing paired off badly.
One charatcer i don't think have to be paired (although I sometimes pair her up with Tom Paris, in some AU stories of mine) is Kes. Not only it is not nessesary, I like to make her a Jedi - like (or even directly a Jedi, if it is a Star Wars crossover) and so "romantic attachments" may be dangerous to her. Especially since she is at risk of falling to the Dark Side, unfortunately.
Antoher charatcer I dom;t like pairing up is Tuvok, since he's married. And Neelix... he may be paired, but it is not nessesary.

I can agree on Seven, the question is only who she should be paired off with. Maybe someone outside the Voyager crew?
Kes kan be used in many ways. But I'm not so sure that she should be an action character, I see her more as a " problem solver" than someone waving swords and fighting. Some of her limited powers could be used in some situations.
As for Tuvok, I agree.
As for Neelix, for a while I really wanted to pair him off with Samantha Wildman. But recently when I was discussing that in a thread here on the Voyager forum, some people started to question that and comment about how unfair it would be to Greskrendtregk, her Ktarian husband.
So I started to feel sorry for Greskrendtregk and decided to skip that idea.
I think that Neelix should stick to his Talaxian family but leave this horrible asteroid on which he was stranded and take his family and settle somewhere near Federation psace where he can have contact with his friends from Voyager and do something useful at the same time.
Sorry, but I have to disagree here.In my opinion, a character with no viable avenue of development, it's better to give them a meaningful death than a meaningless life.
In a story I wrote a couple decades ago (the last half of which is now lost with the site it was on), I had a difficult love triangle: the female protagonist chose one guy over another, but the other was a genuinely good person whom I liked. Since I had not created a suitable alternative love interest for him, and didn't want him just hovering there through the years, pining for the girl he had lost... I killed him off. His death was a final, shattering message about the horrors of war. Instead of a life that was counterproductive to the narrative, he had a productive death.
Given that Harry and Chakotay had very limited value to the overarching Voyager narrative, giving either one a heroic and emotionally gut-wrenching death might have been a good thing.
I just hate when favorite characters are killed off. There have been too much of that in Star Trek for me in recent years, I can't even read a Star trek book anymore without stumbling over the elimination of one of my favorites.
AsI just stated in a discussion with another person on another site, I'm very careful when it comes to kill off characters in stories I write.
I often think: "Can I use this character in a future story?"
In fact, one of the supporting characters in some of my stories are based on a person who died two years ago but I still haven't decide what to do with him. It's like I don't have the nerves or courage to kill off that character.
I guess that the current trend in Star Trek to kill of characters and destroy important planets and such has made me more careful when it comes to do the same things.
As it is, I'm actually trying to restore great characters which have been destroyed or killed off (Kes, Gowron, Garak and even Lt. Carey and Henry Starling) nowadays.
And I can't imagine a good Voyager story without Chakotay and Kim. They are good characters and deserves better than being killed off. Fortunately they weren't but other characters have been very ill-treated by thoughtless producers, writers and authors of books.
Depends on your perspective. I consider the whole "holograms are sentient" idea to be questionable at best anyway. But TNG walked with it (Moriarty), DS9 jogged (Vic), and VOY ran full tilt, far and fast.
I can agree here.Sometimes I find the whole concept a bit "over the top" because it's the risk that sentient holograms become something like Superman after The Doctor got the emitter in the otherwise great episode Future's End.
Since Endgame was such a mess, we have to stick to the Voyager Relaunch books here in which they were.It only works if we actually see them reunited at the end.
The same here. I found Chakotay/Janeway one of the most logical pairings in Star Trek.I shipped those two ever since "Resolutions". Kind of like I shipped Caspian/Susan after seeing "Prince Caspian". Still do, in both cases.
Not to mention that Chakotay/Seven annoyed me. It was just a way from those in charge to show the "finger" to the fans.
He was right!Tim Russ ended that early on. He told the showrunners "I don’t cheat on my wife, and neither does Tuvok."
Here I have to disagree.He was. He was the only VOY character who got a satisfying ending within the series. At least three other VOY characters never got one at all, 23 years after the series ended.
I never watched that horrible episode Homestead and i guess I never will. But I read about it and still think that it was horrible to dump Neelix three episodes from the end of the series and place him on some horrible asteroid in the middle of nowhere. He should have followed the rest of the Voyager crew to earth and done something meaningful there.