That's for sure, you mixed up your units.Not sure, it may also have been a sloppy way of expressing myself. Perhaps I should have said
You aren't crossing the Atlantic at 852' of travel.I'd like transatlantic planes to be able to stay a MUCH longer distance in the air than just 852 feet.
Heck, you have lakes, ponds, & streams that are longer than that.
Hopefully we can decipher your chicken scratch into something intelligbleAnyway, I think the point, while correct, is moot. I am not writing a scientific paper here, expressed myself colloquially, and I assume people know what I meant.

It's a good first step, let's leave it at that.Which is that it may still represent an important advance, even if it isn't nearly good enough yet for use. And I'll be curious to see how quickly incremental advances will come (or not).
It still has a ways to go before it's practical.