The tao of Star Wars is that these things are ideally in balance. The mystical side is certainly no less important.More science, less mysticism.
More logic, less mumbo jumbo.
The tao of Star Wars is that these things are ideally in balance. The mystical side is certainly no less important.More science, less mysticism.
More logic, less mumbo jumbo.
We'll have to agree to disagree.Grey Jedi as a modern concept is stupid. You're either Light or Dark, you can't be both, there is no middle ground.
It goes beyond that.Now the original idea of a Grey Jedi, where the term meant a Jedi not following the Jedi Council, that's fine.
I guess we'll have to disagree on that aspect.The tao of Star Wars is that these things are ideally in balance. The mystical side is certainly no less important.
The execution of the concept in TROS was so poorly handled that a sizable number of people deny it's even a thing in-universe.
They're the same thing. Palpatine's return in TROS was "the clone emperor nonsense of the EU".
I've got to disagree the getting rid of the whole light side/dark side element, would be to massive of a shift in how the Force works.I'm tired of Jedi vs Sith.
I'd rather see a future Star Wars Universe where the Grey Jedi finally take over & dominate the discussion and not make it so polarizing as the dogmatic Jedi or the power hungry Authoritarian Sith.
It's time to let the Old Jedi & Sith concepts stay buried now that the "New Republic" era is over and "The First Order" is done.
Moving forward in time, Force users are more independent and not limited by Light Saber color, or affiliation to the Light/Dark side.
The mysticism and mumbo jumbo are a big part of what make Star Wars unique, and getting rid of them would turn it into just another generic space franchise.People can be more nuanced, complex, use both sides powers.
More of a world of Marvel like X-men Mutants & people with Super Powers.
Less Good vs Evil Force Factions.
Create a more dynamic multi-faction Star Wars Universe that is more nuanced.
More science, less mysticism.
More logic, less mumbo jumbo.
Did you dislike the "Midichlorians" explanation?More blood tests in Star Wars, damnit!
I'm indifferent to it. The whole thing feels needlessly complicated, like how in X-Men they have classes of powers for different characters. It's a statistics measuring contest by another name.Did you dislike the "Midichlorians" explanation?
I thought you like "Mysitcal Mumbo Jumbo"?The whole virgin birth thing with conception by the midiclorians annoys me more.
It depends on the mystical elements and how it is used in a story.I thought you like "Mysitcal Mumbo Jumbo"?
Doesn't that pretty much fall in line with that?
George Lucas.The Force was far more mystical in the original trilogy. Adding things like midichlorians was something I hated.. Who can we blame for that?
Midi-chlorians were first conceived by George Lucas as early as 1977. In this time the first Expanded Universe products were being created, including the ongoing Marvel Star Wars series and Alan Dean Foster's novel Splinter of the Mind's Eye. Lucas sat down with a member of his staff, Carol Titelman, to dictate a number of guidelines for these works, explaining various concepts of his universe. Among them were an explanation of midi-chlorians, which Force-sensitive beings were said to have more of in their cells.[36] However, Lucas did not feel he had the time to introduce the concept of midi-chlorians. The idea would not appear in any Star Wars product for twenty-two years; Lucas chose 1999's Star Wars: Episode I The Phantom Menace as the opportunity to first mention the midi-chlorians, explaining why some were sensitive to the Force while others were not, an issue that he had left unresolved since the original film Star Wars. Lucas incorporated the explanation of midi-chlorians into the film as part of Anakin Skywalker's journey towards understanding the Force.[37] That Lucas had planned the midi-chlorians as far back as 1977 was hinted at on the DVD commentary of The Phantom Menace, but the details would not be fully revealed for another eight years, coming to light in the 2007 book The Making of Star Wars: The Definitive Story Behind the Original Film, the hardcover edition of which had, among its appendices, Lucas' notes for the Expanded Universe authors. Despite this, however, Lucas implied that the precepts of being a Jedi could be practiced by "anyone" when discussing the story treatment for Star Wars: Episode VI Return of the Jedi in 1981 (then-titled Revenge of the Jedi), and in particular the backstory for Anakin (who had been revealed to be Darth Vader), comparing it to yoga or karate.[38] In addition, JW Rinzler also indicated in another interview that George Lucas added the midi-chlorian concept to his statements after the fact in the Making of Star Wars hardcover edition
Controversy
Midi-chlorians have had some negative reception among fans; some see them as adding hard science to the alleged "mysteriousness" or spirituality of the Force and dislike what they see as a new concept. Others, however, believe that having a physical aspect to a mystical Force calls upon real-world religious traditions, feeling that the mythic qualities of the Force have been strengthened by midi-chlorians.
A misconception exists that rather than being indicators, midi-chlorians actually are the Force or create it; there is no canonical basis for this belief.[44][45][46] Steve Perry, who used midi-chlorians in his novel Death Star, opined that they were "less than inspired."[47] George Lucas, on the other hand, considers the two aspects of the Force separately, treating the midi-chlorians as the practical, biological side, distinct from the spiritual and metaphysical side of the Force.[37]
George Lucas.
![]()
Midi-chlorian/Legends
Midi-chlorians were intelligent microscopic life-forms that lived symbiotically inside the cells of all living things. When present in sufficient numbers, they could allow their host to detect the pervasive energy field known as the Force. Midi-chlorian counts were linked to potential in the...starwars.fandom.com
Fair enough, but it was part of his "Original Concept" since the beginnings of Star Wars.So it's his fault. I don't like the concept sorry, I mean SW is his baby but that part of it I do not like, I would have preferred it left mysterious
Moving forward in time, Force users are more independent and not limited by Light Saber color, or affiliation to the Light/Dark side.
People can be more nuanced, complex, use both sides powers.
More of a world of Marvel like X-men Mutants & people with Super Powers.
Less Good vs Evil Force Factions.
More science, less mysticism.
More logic, less mumbo jumbo.
Grey Jedi as a modern concept is stupid. You're either Light or Dark, you can't be both, there is no middle ground.
And what are you going to do, now that the Jedi & Sith storylines have been played out and both factions are more or less gone?George Lucas has always said the Force believers / practitioners were not like superheroes--the latter often simply having power and no substance behind their lives and actions, or a larger part in the destiny of themselves and all others.The entire original point of Star Wars was rooted in a conflict between two religious factions who were the movers and shakers of an entire galaxy, whether the atheistic Empire (or occasional dullards such as Han Solo) acknowledged it or not. Star Wars is about spiritually-aligned / guided destiny, not random, secular conflicts. Without the Force, its will and practitioners, there's no point to the concept.
Guess we'll find out if/when the Rey movies happen.Moving forward in time, what is your solution?
Nope. Palpatine isn't even mentioned until episode 9.Don't you mean happen off screen between 6 and 7?
What difference does it make what movie it's in, if the objective is to make narrative sense?
I wasn't talking about the subjective feeling of entertainment, I was talking about the plot. It's the same plot device as in the comics.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.