• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Controversial Star Wars Opinion Thread

Grey Jedi as a modern concept is stupid. You're either Light or Dark, you can't be both, there is no middle ground.
We'll have to agree to disagree.

Now the original idea of a Grey Jedi, where the term meant a Jedi not following the Jedi Council, that's fine.
It goes beyond that.

But obviously, you prefer the polar extremes of the franchise.

The tao of Star Wars is that these things are ideally in balance. The mystical side is certainly no less important.
I guess we'll have to disagree on that aspect.

There's already too much mysticism, not enough logic/science.
 
I'm tired of Jedi vs Sith.

I'd rather see a future Star Wars Universe where the Grey Jedi finally take over & dominate the discussion and not make it so polarizing as the dogmatic Jedi or the power hungry Authoritarian Sith.

It's time to let the Old Jedi & Sith concepts stay buried now that the "New Republic" era is over and "The First Order" is done.

Moving forward in time, Force users are more independent and not limited by Light Saber color, or affiliation to the Light/Dark side.
I've got to disagree the getting rid of the whole light side/dark side element, would be to massive of a shift in how the Force works.
People can be more nuanced, complex, use both sides powers.

More of a world of Marvel like X-men Mutants & people with Super Powers.

Less Good vs Evil Force Factions.

Create a more dynamic multi-faction Star Wars Universe that is more nuanced.

More science, less mysticism.

More logic, less mumbo jumbo.
The mysticism and mumbo jumbo are a big part of what make Star Wars unique, and getting rid of them would turn it into just another generic space franchise.
 
The Force was far more mystical in the original trilogy. Adding things like midichlorians was something I hated.. Who can we blame for that?
 
For the concepts in the Force, we still need to see what was going on with Baylon Skol and is orange lightsaber in Ahsoka. They were not Sith, and he had trained Shin to be something more than a Jedi. What that turns into might shift things a little. You also have Grogu and Sabine who will have Mandalorian training in their Force usage.
 
The Force was far more mystical in the original trilogy. Adding things like midichlorians was something I hated.. Who can we blame for that?
George Lucas.

Midi-chlorians were first conceived by George Lucas as early as 1977. In this time the first Expanded Universe products were being created, including the ongoing Marvel Star Wars series and Alan Dean Foster's novel Splinter of the Mind's Eye. Lucas sat down with a member of his staff, Carol Titelman, to dictate a number of guidelines for these works, explaining various concepts of his universe. Among them were an explanation of midi-chlorians, which Force-sensitive beings were said to have more of in their cells.[36] However, Lucas did not feel he had the time to introduce the concept of midi-chlorians. The idea would not appear in any Star Wars product for twenty-two years; Lucas chose 1999's Star Wars: Episode I The Phantom Menace as the opportunity to first mention the midi-chlorians, explaining why some were sensitive to the Force while others were not, an issue that he had left unresolved since the original film Star Wars. Lucas incorporated the explanation of midi-chlorians into the film as part of Anakin Skywalker's journey towards understanding the Force.[37] That Lucas had planned the midi-chlorians as far back as 1977 was hinted at on the DVD commentary of The Phantom Menace, but the details would not be fully revealed for another eight years, coming to light in the 2007 book The Making of Star Wars: The Definitive Story Behind the Original Film, the hardcover edition of which had, among its appendices, Lucas' notes for the Expanded Universe authors. Despite this, however, Lucas implied that the precepts of being a Jedi could be practiced by "anyone" when discussing the story treatment for Star Wars: Episode VI Return of the Jedi in 1981 (then-titled Revenge of the Jedi), and in particular the backstory for Anakin (who had been revealed to be Darth Vader), comparing it to yoga or karate.[38] In addition, JW Rinzler also indicated in another interview that George Lucas added the midi-chlorian concept to his statements after the fact in the Making of Star Wars hardcover edition

Controversy

Midi-chlorians have had some negative reception among fans; some see them as adding hard science to the alleged "mysteriousness" or spirituality of the Force and dislike what they see as a new concept. Others, however, believe that having a physical aspect to a mystical Force calls upon real-world religious traditions, feeling that the mythic qualities of the Force have been strengthened by midi-chlorians.

A misconception exists that rather than being indicators, midi-chlorians actually are the Force or create it; there is no canonical basis for this belief.[44][45][46] Steve Perry, who used midi-chlorians in his novel Death Star, opined that they were "less than inspired."[47] George Lucas, on the other hand, considers the two aspects of the Force separately, treating the midi-chlorians as the practical, biological side, distinct from the spiritual and metaphysical side of the Force.[37]
 
George Lucas.



So it's his fault. I don't like the concept sorry, I mean SW is his baby but that part of it I do not like, I would have preferred it left mysterious
 
So it's his fault. I don't like the concept sorry, I mean SW is his baby but that part of it I do not like, I would have preferred it left mysterious
Fair enough, but it was part of his "Original Concept" since the beginnings of Star Wars.
He just didn't have enough time to put it out into the world until "The Phantom Menace".

And I don't mind that aspect myself.

Just because you have the high Midichlorian count, doesn't mean you know how to use it w/o training a long ass time to harness it properly.
Which should be a seperate thing from the Good/Evil side.
The morality play should be a seperate thing from the "Super Power aspect & training".
Not 100% intertwined into it.
 
Moving forward in time, Force users are more independent and not limited by Light Saber color, or affiliation to the Light/Dark side.

People can be more nuanced, complex, use both sides powers.

More of a world of Marvel like X-men Mutants & people with Super Powers.

Less Good vs Evil Force Factions.

George Lucas has always said the Force believers / practitioners were not like superheroes--the latter often simply having power and no substance behind their lives and actions, or a larger part in the destiny of themselves and all others.The entire original point of Star Wars was rooted in a conflict between two religious factions who were the movers and shakers of an entire galaxy, whether the atheistic Empire (or occasional dullards such as Han Solo) acknowledged it or not. Star Wars is about spiritually-aligned / guided destiny, not random, secular conflicts. Without the Force, its will and practitioners, there's no point to the concept.

More science, less mysticism.

Then you do not have Star Wars and its clear, direct purpose in the story its telling. If Lucas wanted to shove Midichlorians into Star Wars, it would have been just as easy as the rest of Obi-Wan's dialogue to Luke (Kenobi's hut scene), but it did not exist at that time, nor was it Lucas' intention to explain the Force that way.

More logic, less mumbo jumbo.

There's soulless productions like most of the post-TOS Star Trek for that (although the "logic" of those series is questionable at best)..

Grey Jedi as a modern concept is stupid. You're either Light or Dark, you can't be both, there is no middle ground.

Agreed.
 
Last edited:
George Lucas has always said the Force believers / practitioners were not like superheroes--the latter often simply having power and no substance behind their lives and actions, or a larger part in the destiny of themselves and all others.The entire original point of Star Wars was rooted in a conflict between two religious factions who were the movers and shakers of an entire galaxy, whether the atheistic Empire (or occasional dullards such as Han Solo) acknowledged it or not. Star Wars is about spiritually-aligned / guided destiny, not random, secular conflicts. Without the Force, its will and practitioners, there's no point to the concept.
And what are you going to do, now that the Jedi & Sith storylines have been played out and both factions are more or less gone?

Moving forward in time, what is your solution?

More of the same?
 
Don't you mean happen off screen between 6 and 7?
Nope. Palpatine isn't even mentioned until episode 9.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

What difference does it make what movie it's in, if the objective is to make narrative sense?

I wasn't talking about the subjective feeling of entertainment, I was talking about the plot. It's the same plot device as in the comics.

Basically because the whole thing is a mess and it feels like "somehow Palpatine returned" was pulled out of Abrams butt at the last minute. Of course, it also does not help that it feels like Ryan Johnson went "hah, let me see how much I can undercut Abrams initial idea and torque this story in an unknown direction. I know, I'll kill Snoke!"

Hey, you want Palpatine to be the bad guy this wholr time? Fine. Tell the audience.

I liked Dark Empire. You are right, it's the same basic plot. Somehow Palpatine Returned. But that was clear if not from the first issue then definitely the second.

Even looking at it from the movie episodes, it's odd that Palpatine isn't revealed until episode 9. Palpatine is known to the audience as being the villain pulling the strings in Episodes I-III. He's not mentioned by name in IV but that was the pilot episode. We see him briefly in V but it's clear he's telling Vader what to do. In VI he's the main villain. So that's 5 out of 6 episodes he appears in and is mentioned in all 6.

Now, to skip even 1 mention of him in VII and VIII yet retroactively in I make him the main villain in those two previous episodes just feels like a misstep when looking at the entire series. Of course, that's because there was no plan when VII was made to somehow have Palpatine return.

That's what I mean. I sure you're mileage will vary.
 
There can and have been others who use the Force. Light side and Dark side are from how things are used. What goal is being served. The Dark Side, or at least the Sith tend to be seen as corruption in the Force, bringing it out of balance. The Jedi and Sith do not have monopoly on the Force, they are just the best known in the galaxy at large, and have had state sponsorship at various times since the Old Republic days.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top