Except when it would.Since there's only 18 billion iterations of these characters across mounds of media, it doesn't hurt to sometimes be authentic to the comics.
But enough about superhero movies. What about "Chasing Squirrels?"

Except when it would.Since there's only 18 billion iterations of these characters across mounds of media, it doesn't hurt to sometimes be authentic to the comics.
I think a lot of it has to do with Christopher Reeve's life after playing the character.
He became as beloved a 'character' as the DC character he played.
The John Williams theme is forever tied to his portrayal and folks will always remember him fondly when hearing that theme.
Exactly, at this stage it’s as associated with the character as the James Bond theme is with 007. It withstands reboots.
Your feelings are valid, but in this particular case, that's not sufficient enough to convince most folks that what you prescribe from an creative artist's POV, is going to change their minds.
This is a very good comparison. James Bond films have their own soundtracks, but variations of the main theme remain. Another iconic example is the Mission: Impossible theme or even the original Star Trek theme. People hear the music and immediately associate with something specific.
"Superman had no choice but to kill Zod" is an argument I'm sympathetic to, but what really matters in comparing portrayals is that Snyder had an absolute free choice in deciding what story to tell.
This is counterfactual. Again, nothing between the Ruby-Spears animated Superman in 1988 and the Smallville episode Rosetta in 2003 reused the Williams theme.
I noticed a lot of times, now they just use the logo for the studio producing the movies and not the parent company, the MCU movies and Star Wars movies only show the Marvel Studios and Lucasfilm logos, but not the Disney one, even though most people know Disney owns them.Over 26 million views on DC's YouTube channel. And only two million of those was me.
Anyway, while rewatching just now, I realized the WB logo wasn't in the teaser.
I don't think it's any kind of judgement on the quality of the other themes so much as it's about the fact that a lot of people Williams' theme has come to represent Superman more than any other. It's the one piece of music you can use that will instantly bring Superman to mind for the majority of people, the only other one that might come close at this point is Save Me from Smallville.But that's why it seems strange to me to reuse the Reeve theme for Brandon Routh's Superman or David Corenswet's. I'm used to different Supermen having their own themes -- Bud Collyer had his, George Reeves had his, Dean Cain had his, the DCAU Superman had his, Henry Cavill had his, Tyler Hoechlin had his (two different ones, in fact, though Superman & Lois's theme was far less memorable than his motif in Supergirl), etc. The only other Superman leitmotif that's been used for two different incarnations -- indeed, two entirely different characters -- is the theme that Kevin Kiner wrote in 1988 for the young Clark Kent version of Superboy and revived recently in Titans for the Conner Kent Superboy.
See, that's why my perception is different. I remember the Williams theme fondly, of course, but it's far from the only Superman theme I remember fondly. I like most of them. I like that they're different explorations of the same basic heroic march style that Sammy Timberg started us off with. To me, there isn't just one Superman theme -- Superman themes are an entire genre unto themselves. And thus, I welcome new contributions to the genre.
Dark for the sake of dark, ignoring how it is supposed to represent the character.
:
Also the 2017 version of Justice League, briefly.And only Smallville, Superman Returns, and the Flash movie have really done it since then, until now.
That's not accurate. It also shows up in Justice League, Shazam!, Black Adam, and League of Super-Pets.And only Smallville, Superman Returns, and the Flash movie have really done it since then, until now.
As with Trek, the difference is that in both cases...
That’s wildly optimistic to the point of unrealistic. Zod was an extremist before Kal was even born. The first thing we see Zod do in MOS is kill a member of his planet’s government and stage a coup d’etat. A coup that ends with him murdering Kal’s father, Jor-El. Zod carves a killing spree across two planets, before Superman stops him.Exactly, there was a moment the first time I watched MoS when there was a pause in the fight between Zod and Kal. I fully expected Kal-El to convince Zod that his plan was flawed and for the climax of the movie to be the two of theme working together to repair the damage/save Earth. The movie could have ended with Zod setting out for a new world to settle and an uneasy truce between Kal and the other Kryptonians.
Well, technically he didn't kill Batman.M.A.C.O. said:He killed baby Kal, Kara and Keaton Batman with no hesitation and no sympathy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.