• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Starship Design in Star Trek: Picard

Since there is an Elios XII, it's probably a fair bet there are at least 11 other Elios's flying around out there. Also naming the class ship (in this case) Elios or Elios I would make sense. In all other scenarios that have occurred in the past, I find it to be kind of lazy and contrived. Looking at you, Centaur class, despite how much I love the design.
Elios XII: The Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Unsinkable!
 
"Kurtzman-Beyer" drive??? :rofl:

The lengths we fans will go to try to shoehorn explanatory rationale into the canon for completely irrational decisions made by the show runners...
I just figured there was a period in the early to mid 23rd century where they dicked around with rectangular nacelles. Then, for whatever reason, they went back to round.

It was a design fad.
 
Yeah I'm more laughing at the name. If anything, Fuller's name should have been thrown in there somewhere. He's the one that painted everyone into a corner with that square-nacelle foolishness in the first place...
Yeah, the square nacelles are definitely the biggest flaw of the Disco Ships. Especially since they look so good with round nacelles!
CSNMEgd.jpeg
MQnRI13.jpeg
MU8iv1C.jpeg
 
I don't have it on hand but in a Star Trek Online Starships Collection magazine, the strange nacelles of the Age of the Discovery were explained due to Starfleet trying a brand-new warp drive instead of the "Cochrane-Archer" drive, the "Kurztman-Beyer" drive. During the Klingon War, Starfleet was decimated. Finally, in 2259, a shipyard with many such ships was abandoned due to a stellar event, prompting Starfleet to abandon the Beyer drive in favor of the Cochrane drive, ergo focusing on round nacelles again.
It was Eaves/Bayer, not Kurtzman/Bayer. At least in the actual Lore blogs on the STO website.


Maybe something changed when they did the lore for the Eaglemoss booklets, I don't own any of them.

"Kurtzman-Beyer" drive??? :rofl:

The lengths we fans will go to try to shoehorn explanatory rationale into the canon for completely irrational decisions made by the show runners...
We who read the novels are no stranger to this. They loved to do it there too
 
Last edited:
It was Eaves/Bayer, not Kurtzman/Bayer. At least in the actual Lore blogs on the STO website.

This reminds me of the Interstellar Mechanics article Thomas Marrone tweeted in August about the different generations of warp drive. I'm quite happy to imagine there's generations of warp drive this article didn't cover, especially if they only saw limited release or weren't considered successful. Eaves/Bayer would fit right in between the Archer and Marvick drives since there's a good century of development between them.

Similarly, I'm quite happy to believe that there's a generation between the Liner Intermix Shaft of TMP and the Brahms engine of TNG, given that we glimpse something that's visually somewhere between the two aboard the Hathaway in "Peak Performance".
 
Oh, there’s no doubt that they added the WFG to make it look more like the NX-01. That’s the first thing I noticed. But the nacelles, escape pods, windows, etc. seem to indicate a newer design.
Drexler and some of his colleagues have retconned that the impulse defection crystals on earlier designs were actually warp field governors, so I guess those are no longer really a mid-22nd century design cue.

The only one I remember is that Eaves rationalized to himself that all the ships had weird engines because they were all involved in spore drive tests, but I don't know if that was something he deduced himself or actually something under consideration by the writers during Discovery's hectic pre-production phase.
The rationalization makes sense, the art department undoubtedly believed that any "spore drive" mechanism would be housed in the nacelles, so if there were any notes from higher up in the production that it might be something under consideration for fleet wide deployment, I can see designing all of the nacelles with that in mind.

Still wondering what that 25% note actually meant and why the difference was required.
It was probably an art direction* that was misconstrued as a legal requirement.

* = someone said to Eaves something along the lines of, "we want you to design it largely the same, with a few differences, but not too different. You know, about 25% different..."
 
* = someone said to Eaves something along the lines of, "we want you to design it largely the same, with a few differences, but not too different. You know, about 25% different..."
Well it wasn't just someone told him verbally, someone also wrote it on one of his concept art pieces that's been posted online, I'm guessing the art director or whoever Eaves' boss would be.

Drexler and some of his colleagues have retconned that the impulse defection crystals on earlier designs
I mean, hard to retcon something that wasn't canon in the first place :p Impulse Deflection crystal came from.. Scott's guide I think?

Warp Governor I don't believe it was ever labelled or mentioned in the show either?

It's just some behind the scenes tech stuff they created for the ship for the writers to use if they wanted to.

So really what I'm saying is completely pointless.
 
Last edited:
Impulse Deflection crystal came from.. Scott's guide I think?
Older, and closer to the source. It first appeared in the TMP blueprints by David Kimble (1980), based off the construction blueprints of the original filming miniature, and tied directly into the official merchandising campaign for TMP. It had Roddenberry's and Probert's approval and blessings. I don't think the callout has ever been seen on screen, so not fully canon. There is one possibility that it was mentioned during the pre-launch scene in TMP while they were in drydock. They were calling out parts of the ship that are specifically labeled in those blueprints. I just can't find any transcripts showing it right now to see if it was mentioned. That would be the only canonical observance that I could cite. It is not shown on Scotty's blueprints in TUC. That only said "Impulse Propulsion System".

It was always an "impulse deflection crystal" until ENT came along and retconned it into something else, probably because it was an interesting-looking greeble, but placed on the model in such a way that it couldn't have possibly had anything to do with the NX's impulse engines, so they called it something else.
 
In TWOK, right after the Enterprise destroys the Reliant’s crystal, there is this bit of dialog:

JOACHIM: They've damaged the photon-control and the warp drive. We must withdraw.

So based on that one bit of canon info, the crystal had nothing to do with the impulse engines, despite it being right above them.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top