• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

The strangest thing about Picard…

What's there to dial in? Commit or don't. It really doesn't take this long to decide to produce a series or not.
Plans change, and studios are finding there just isn't the money in streaming that they thought there was. Studios looked at Netflix, said "I want a piece of that," and invested a ton in snake oil for no return. Setting money on fire would have a better return.

Personally, I've felt that the streaming model is a poor fit for Star Trek, but the television models don't really make sense anymore.
 
Plans change, and studios are finding there just isn't the money in streaming that they thought there was. Studios looked at Netflix, said "I want a piece of that," and invested a ton in snake oil for no return. Setting money on fire would have a better return.

Personally, I've felt that the streaming model is a poor fit for Star Trek, but the television models don't really make sense anymore.
Plans change, very true, good point. There's money in streaming, but there's a lot of competition, and these streamers tend to overspend. Why not just commit to one series and do 20 episodes a year? I feel like trying to do half a dozen shows at once is what's costing Paramount money.
 
Plans change, and studios are finding there just isn't the money in streaming that they thought there was. Studios looked at Netflix, said "I want a piece of that," and invested a ton in snake oil for no return. Setting money on fire would have a better return.

Personally, I've felt that the streaming model is a poor fit for Star Trek, but the television models don't really make sense anymore.
Correct. There is a huge challenge to trying to find the money, and take Netflix's piece of the pie. The result is a largely diluted streaming market that results in fewer views, less money, but also that the broadcast model has shifted.

I don't see the old broadcast model returning. One, it's costing a lot more for episodes the be produced, and adding on more episodes means more money. Two, a lot of actors are moving from project to project, rather than keeping to one show.

The other side that I truly think is the huge fear of missing out, so studios keep pumping in money hunting for the goose that lays the golden eggs.
 
I don't see the old broadcast model returning. One, it's costing a lot more for episodes the be produced, and adding on more episodes means more money.
It's because they want it to look like the movies but in the TV format. They spend far too much money.
Two, a lot of actors are moving from project to project, rather than keeping to one show.
They can't pay the bills with 10-episode seasons.
The other side that I truly think is the huge fear of missing out, so studios keep pumping in money hunting for the goose that lays the golden eggs.
True.
 
I mean, I don't know. I don't live that life.

I just don't see longer seasons coming back, at least as harsh and as grueling as the 90s were.
I didn't say they will, I'm just noting that working on multiple productions as an actor is necessary when the season is only 10 episodes. It's not fulltime like a 20+ episode season is.
 
I didn't say they will, I'm just noting that working on multiple productions as an actor is necessary when the season is only 10 episodes. It's not fulltime like a 20+ episode season is.
From what I've gathered that's what actors want to in order to have variety of roles to play, rather than stuck in one. I don't think that's a bad thing.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top