Sturgeon's Law. One out of three might be what we deserve.Saavik? Wonderful in TWOK. Her other two appearances...meh. So I wouldn't call her "developed"

Anyhow, she's more proactive than some, and got more screen time than many of her peers.
Sturgeon's Law. One out of three might be what we deserve.Saavik? Wonderful in TWOK. Her other two appearances...meh. So I wouldn't call her "developed"
She was in three films and not in every second. So I'm thinking more than a few on the list got more screentime.Sturgeon's Law. One out of three might be what we deserve.
Anyhow, she's more proactive than some, and got more screen time than many of her peers.
But not in TWOK.She was in three films and not in every second. So I'm thinking more than a few on the list got more screentime.
TWOK is one film with a runtime of 113 minutesBut not in TWOK.
How much screen time and how many lines does Savik get? She is not a major character even in that one.TWOK is one film with a runtime of 113 minutes
Negative. She's no Arlene Galway.Would you believe Yeoman Smith, from "Where No Man Has Gone Before"?
I can definitely get behind this.The U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701, of course. She has deck by deck plans, technical specifications and manuals, explanations for what every button on every station on her bridge does.
And Kirk loves her.
No one else is as well developed as that.
If there is still any doubt Nana needed to write this book, ...The U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701, of course. She has deck by deck plans, technical specifications and manuals, explanations for what every button on every station on her bridge does.
And Kirk loves her.
No one else is as well developed as that.
That's sarcasm, yeah?I'm a little surprised Dr. Crusher hasn't got even one vote.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.