How is it 'blatantly the only reason'I am absolutely not against representation.
I just think it's a disservice to those being represented if that's blatantly the only reason why they're there.
How is it 'blatantly the only reason'I am absolutely not against representation.
I just think it's a disservice to those being represented if that's blatantly the only reason why they're there.
Well they spent money on new filming so not a clip show really.I normally hate "clip show" episodes of shows but I liked this one because this was a nice twist on clip shows. The actual characters themselves went back in time to take part in old clips! Well not really old clips, but like stuff that happened in the past! Cool episode and I also liked how it tied into that one Short Trek that I thought was declared non-canon until now.
How is it 'blatantly the only reason'
No offense, but, did you read the whole article?That very article makes it clear that the Character of Adira was conceived as non-binary before Blu was cast.
“We kind of had this idea of who Adira would be, and then Blu came along,” Paradise says. “And we just thought, Oh, we have to, we have to now tailor this character to this person who’s just so extraordinary.”
No offense, but, did you read the whole article?
Which is why Adira was "she" for their first few episodes.
Viewers will notice that neither Adira nor Gray’s gender identity are explicitly discussed in “Forget Me Not”; characters even refer to Adira with she/her pronouns instead of they/them. That is by design.
...
Our message to [Del Barrio and Alexander] from the very beginning was, ‘We want to follow your lead with all of this.
...
For Del Barrio — who had not yet come out to their parents as non-binary when they were cast on the show — that meant allowing Adira’s comfort level with sharing their gender identity to evolve very much in parallel with how it was unfolding for them off camera.
Emphasis mine. We haven't seen any confirmation as to the creators' intentions with the characters yet. Just because they ended up being severely underutilized, it doesn't necessarily mean that nothing was planned for them to begin with and they were just shoddily added for cheap representation points. You can't take what we know about the characters now or how people have reacted to them after having seen the finished series and use those to construct retroactive arguments about how there was never any legitimate reason to create them to begin with.It felt like, once they got their magazine covers and such, they weren't really interested in doing much with either of them as characters.
It might have something to do with the fact that Angel wasn't the first officially nonbinary character in the entire Star Trek franchise. If Adira and Gray weren't created, surely Angel would've received similar media attention, regardless of whether they got a more substantial storyline or not.Like I said in another post, you contrast that with Captain Angel on SNW, who didn't get nearly the media attention but was treated more like a vital, interesting character, and it's jarring.
Blatant because from the start, that was the big emphasis in the media. I'd be more forgiving if they'd done more with the characters, but with Gray it's especially egregious. He got a body, and then traipsed off to Trill. It felt like, once they got their magazine covers and such, they weren't really interested in doing much with either of them as characters. Like I said in another post, you contrast that with Captain Angel on SNW, who didn't get nearly the media attention but was treated more like a vital, interesting character, and it's jarring.
In case you need it spelled out, they adjusted the character of Adira to be earlier in their journey than initially conceived to match the actor. Hence the bit about being open for non-binary parts before being out publicly.
My apologies if I came off insulting. Posts on a message board don't allow for nuance in tone. I never meant to impugn your reading comprehension. I genuinely thought perhaps you hadn't read the whole article.
If they meant for Adira to always be NB, then it is VERY weird that they made a whole scene to spell that out, in-character, when it makes no sense in-universe that they wouldn't have established this well ahead of time. At a minimum, the whole issue was badly handled, both onscreen and off.
A hard disagree. It was handled in the most elegant and LGBTQ-positive way possible. Stamets made a simple mistake, Adira calmly corrected him, which he accepted with a shrug, after which everyone went on about their days. Which is exactly the treatment trans people have been wishing for since forever. As we saw Adira meeting the Discovery crew, they couldn't quite have done it the same way as it was with Angel who had already arrived on the Enterprise by the time we first saw them, so we can infer that preferred pronouns were requested at some point. With Adira, it was either them stating their pronouns on screen or the crew just abruptly starting to gender them correctly without any explanation (this includes both already using they/them to a completely unknown person they have just met and starting to gender them correctly at some later point), which would've reduced the already announced first in representation to a secret conspiratory wink.If they meant for Adira to always be NB, then it is VERY weird that they made a whole scene to spell that out, in-character, when it makes no sense in-universe that they wouldn't have established this well ahead of time. At a minimum, the whole issue was badly handled, both onscreen and off.
Nhan was never chief tactical officer to begin with. Rhys had been tactical all along, and Nhan was one of many security chiefs. Folding the two positions into one was a TNG invention.This is highlighted by the fact that I didn't even know Rhys had become chief tactical officer after Nhan left.
Far From Home (Season 3x01) established that out of 136, 89 members of the crew (65.4%) decided to go to the future, including Nhan who was granted a last-minute transfer from the Enterprise, with one not surviving the trip. Your mileage may vary on whether almost two thirds is still to much or not, but it was very pointedly not everyone.it really rang false to me that all 100+ crew would do the same.
3x02, actually.Far From Home (Season 3x01)
No they where "she" the first few episodes because del Barrio hadn't come out to all their family when filming started.No offense, but, did you read the whole article?
Which is why Adira was "she" for their first few episodes.
No they where "she" the first few episodes because del Barrio hadn't come out to all their family when filming started.
The other side is that Adria is also there to play off of Culber and Stamets and create a new relationship with them. They all gravitate together as a found family, and add a new dynamic as they adopt Adria. It's sweet and fun and I thoroughly enjoyed their interactions in the opener. I don't think that relationship would be the same with any of the other bridge crew, though I'm sure they could try to adopt Detmer...A hard disagree. It was handled in the most elegant and LGBTQ-positive way possible. Stamets made a simple mistake, Adira calmly corrected him, which he accepted with a shrug, after which everyone went on about their days. Which is exactly the treatment trans people have been wishing for since forever. As we saw Adira meeting the Discovery crew, they couldn't quite have done it the same way as it was with Angel who had already arrived on the Enterprise by the time we first saw them, so we can infer that preferred pronouns were requested at some point. With Adira, it was either them stating their pronouns on screen or the crew just abruptly starting to gender them correctly without any explanation (this includes both already using they/them to a completely unknown person they have just met and starting to gender them correctly at some later point), which would've reduced the already announced first in representation to a secret conspiratory wink.
Or...maybe...by having them come in already being called by their correct pronouns,we highlight how much of a non-issue it ought to be? No one on TOS ever talked about Uhura being Black, which arguably did more for inclusivity than pointing it out nonsensically in character.A hard disagree. It was handled in the most elegant and LGBTQ-positive way possible...which would've reduced the already announced first in representation to a secret conspiratory wink.
Nhan was never chief tactical officer to begin with. Rhys had been tactical all along, and Nhan was one of many security chiefs. Folding the two positions into one was a TNG invention.
Far From Home (Season 3x01) established that out of 136, 89 members of the crew (65.4%) decided to go to the future, including Nhan who was granted a last-minute transfer from the Enterprise, with one not surviving the trip. Your mileage may vary on whether almost two thirds is still to much or not, but it was very pointedly not everyone.
The other side is that Adria is also there to play off of Culber and Stamets and create a new relationship with them. They all gravitate together as a found family, and add a new dynamic as they adopt Adria. It's sweet and fun and I thoroughly enjoyed their interactions in the opener. I don't think that relationship would be the same with any of the other bridge crew, though I'm sure they could try to adopt Detmer...
I'm not sure why that would make a difference. Can a person not play NB if they aren't NB themselves? Jessie Keitel isn't NB, but she played one on SNW.
I think it comes down to how one views Stamets. Early Stamets is a curmudgeon that is a genius. Over time, we see him moving past his work, and building on his relationship, and seeking that relationship, to the point that he is angry as hell as Burnham for risking people. He's actually moving through Erikson's developmental stages in a way I quite expect and understand.Well, that's where our experiences differ a bit. I found Stamets's fixation on "adopting" Adira so sudden and so extreme that it creeped me out. It's not as off-putting now, but oh jeez did I hate how they wrote it for the season 3 finale.
I think it comes down to how one views Stamets. Early Stamets is a curmudgeon that is a genius. Over time, we see him moving past his work, and building on his relationship, and seeking that relationship, to the point that he is angry as hell as Burnham for risking people. He's actually moving through Erikson's developmental stages in a way I quite expect and understand.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.