Peacemaker was a "bust" by that logic, didn't hurt him.
Sorry no idea what that is.
Peacemaker was a "bust" by that logic, didn't hurt him.
Why not?In the opening night premiere of Endgame, I had someone sitting right next to me who was watching/using their phone for a significant chunk of the film. It's like, why are you even here?![]()
I'm sorry for your wife's struggles. In a movie theater, however, the glowing phone screen is a significant and intrusive distraction to nearby patrons.Why not?
That's how my wife is. She struggles with significant ADHD and will be doing something on her phone during a movie or show.
There is always a danger in assuming someone's motivation.
I'm sorry for your wife's struggles. In a movie theater, however, the glowing phone screen is a significant and intrusive distraction to nearby patrons.
I once had a guy in a theater talking on his cell phone during the film. I turned and looked at him like, "Are you an actual, clinical sociopath?"
We sit in the back far away from people.I'm sorry for your wife's struggles. In a movie theater, however, the glowing phone screen is a significant and intrusive distraction to nearby patrons.
That's my question. Why do people care so much about the business success or failure with a film? I don't believe the idea that "well, I want it to do well/not do well because I want more/less." Why is that a big deal? Did you like the film or not?Again. The whole pre-ticket sales deciding a movie's fate annoys the hell out of me. How can you judge a movie that hasn't come out yet because of it's pre-ticket sales? Why is this now a factor?
That's a considerate compromise. Kudos to you and your wife.We sit in the back far away from people.
I don't believe the idea that "well, I want it to do well/not do well because I want more/less." Why is that a big deal? Did you like the film or not?
Would not the logical course be to appreciate having what we enjoy, rather than wishing for what might not be?It's like having a show you love getting canceled because not enough people watched it. You HOPE more are on your side to keep what you love going. It can be applied to movies as well. Comics. Restaurants. Sure, life goes on, yadda yadda, but it's human nature to want more of what we enjoy.
Would not the logical course be to appreciate having what we enjoy, rather than wishing for what might not be?
I am forever hopeful that Trek fans might recognize the value in usefulness of one over the other, rather than saying it's emotion; deal with it.We're talking about emotion, not logic. Sometimes they don't see eye to eye.
I am forever hopeful that Trek fans might recognize the value in usefulness of one over the other, rather than saying it's emotion; deal with it.
Star Trek shows us the value of emotions, too.
And a balanced approach in the use of both, closer to classic Stoicism, or more modern DBT approach.Star Trek shows us the value of emotions, too.
This is why people drink.And a balanced approach in the use of both, closer to classic Stoicism, or more modern DBT approach.
But, this is just appealing to the emotional side and it's...confusing.
True, but that's too easy.This is why people drink.
Sorry no idea what that is.
Think about how insane making this movie at its budget was to begin with. This is a relatively unknown character without a huge following. Why not do a low budget Marvel movie direct to D+? Disney has a budgeting problem. At least they were smart enough to not throw lots of cash at the first Antman movie.
What movie and character are you even talking about here?
This movie wasn't the first Captain Marvel movie and the last one made over a billion dollars on a 150m budget, so an extra 70m wasn't exactly 'insanity' territory.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.