Pretty much a ridiculously overpowered character TBH.
Although, of course, the MCU version need not have the same powers (ask Ms. Marvel or the Eternals).
Pretty much a ridiculously overpowered character TBH.
We really don't know much about the MCU's '60s, so they could easily have been around then, and they just haven't come up yet.
Yeah, but his Human Torch wasn't part of the MCU, and Mount was Black Bolt in Multiverse of Madness.Chris Evans as Human Torch didn’t impact Captain America.
Oh yeah, he's a great actor and I'm sure if Marvel does cast him, he'll be good, he's just not an actor that immediately jumps to mind for Mr. Fantastic.Well, I've seen Pascal in The Mandalorian and Wonder Woman 1984, and he played two extremely different characters in those, so I'm sure he can play other types of character as well. The people who cast movies are professionals who know their job far better than we do, and who actually test the actors for the roles they're up for rather than just relying on their memory of different roles. I'm sure they have good reason for their choices. It's not like they're just pulling names out of a hat.
The second story arc/collection of the first New Avengers series deals with him a lot, the arc is even named after him.Well, his powers seem basic, but if his personality is interesting, it can work
Any specific comics I should check out?
Oh yeah, he's a great actor and I'm sure if Marvel does cast him, he'll be good, he's just not an actor that immediately jumps to mind for Mr. Fantastic.
Of course, but that doesn't mean we can't share our first thoughts and opinions on the choices they might be making. And like @Tosk said in the post above mine, they're not infallible and have from time to time made bad choices.Which is why professional casting directors are better at their jobs than the rest of us. They can see potentials we don't.
And like @Tosk said in the post above mine, they're not infallible and have from time to time made bad choices.
In which case, I would respectfully submit James Bond/Sean Connery and the various successors, some more successful than others, but still recast
I agree with you about Keaton and that’s why one can’t simply assume the casting people are always right.
If he ended up being cast, would that be the first instance of them reusing an actor who had already played a different role?Latest rumor is Mads Mikkelsen is one the actors the studio talked to for Doctor Doom.
Gemma Chan.If he ended up being cast, would that be the first instance of them reusing an actor who had already played a different role?
Gemma Chan.
As great as Connery had been in the Bond role, Broccoli, et al., felt Bond could be recast, and was not risking the perception of--in the case of Boseman's Black Panther--disrespect of one who--for some--became a the embodiment of black aspiration contrasted against generational adversity. Far different case than a spy role being recast time and again.
Most certainly in the case of Keaton, who remains the worst, wrongheaded act of superhero casting in movie history.
I have a bigger problem with his Bruce Wayne,Imo Connery isn't the best Bond
You don't like Keaton as Batman?
I have a bigger problem with his Bruce Wayne,
Keaton's Bruce Wayne was not to my liking. At times it seemed he was playing Clark Kent.Pourquoi?
Keaton's Bruce Wayne was not to my liking. At times it seemed he was playing Clark Kent.
Imo Connery isn't the best Bond
You don't like Keaton as Batman?
I'd even go so far as to say "at least" 15 years older. The 60s had a different view when it came to older men marrying younger women. Even the family friendly Dick Van Dyke show had an episode where we learned that Laura was underage when they were married and falsified her birth certificate. There was never a ethical question about the decision.
Latest rumor is Mads Mikkelsen is one the actors the studio talked to for Doctor Doom.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.