• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

NCC -1701 (TOS).....

Ah but they did, there have been at least 9 different versions of the Tardis, each with different proportions, roof shape, and paint colors. The current Tardis is as different from the 1963 version (or even a real police box) as the SNW Enterprise is from the original. But to the average viewer "It's the same picture".

The differences in the Tardis exterior over time have been so incredibly minimal that no one would ever say, ‘That’s not what the Tardis is supposed to look like!’ That’s obviously not true for the Discoprise, despite what you quoted above. A more apt comparison to the Tardis would be the Cage version of the Enterprise as opposed to the regular series TOS Enterprise.

But I will agree that the average viewer doesn’t give a crap what the ship looks like.
 
Last edited:
The differences in the Tardis exterior over time have been so incredibly minimal that no one would ever say, ‘That’s not what the Tardis is supposed to look like!’ That’s obviously not true for the Discoprise, despite what you quoted above. A more apt comparison to the Tardis would be the Cage version of the Enterprise as opposed to the regular series TOS Enterprise.

But I will agree that the average viewer doesn’t give a crap what the ship looks like.

still sure about "minimal"?

7c10MrQ_d.webp
 
it’s a different color, a different size, and none of the elements or detailing is interchangeable. All things you can say when comparing the TOS Enterprise with SNW, but not the Pilot and series versions.

They look close enough to me. YMMV.
 
It is. And really I felt that start with TMP. The TMP refit felt like a much different ship and was treated as a much different ship and did not have the same general feel to it as the TOS Enterprise. It made TOS stand out quite oddly. The uniform change was another, with the more muted tones harkening back to the Cage than anything in TOS.

With the movement towards the Excelsior, then the Galaxy Class, and then the NX-01 the lineage feels very different.

TOS may be the icon for pop culture but that doesn't mean it fits with everything that came after it.

It fits with everything that came after just fine. It's before where the problem lies.....:guffaw:
 
You still need to produce a show for a 21st century audience. There are expectations for things set in the future to look futuristic. Which I think SNW has done a wonderful job at conveying. The ship, both inside and out, shows it's 1960's influence, without being overly retro. It looks futuristic and fantastical.

As for the TARDIS, i'd say it is a bad example because a police box is a real object. People expect a real object to look....real.

Again, updated lighting and it DOES fit in. It's a perfectly futuristic design. It didn't need to be scaled up twice as big and altered as much as it was. The original ship design should not be dismissed because of bad effects, lightning and detail that failed to show up on TOS. This clip proves it fits in just fine with most of it's original look.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Not really, no.

It always stood out. It might have been the hook for me in to DS9 but it didn't fit right. It felt quite different.

How so? It was a ship of the past so of course it would have looked a bit dated compared to DS9. If a modern 2023 Ford mustang traveled back in time to 1965 and met its 1965 counterpart they would look weird together as well. But I don't think the audience would say ....oh my god that old mustang needs to be updated to fit in with modern mustang....:guffaw:
 
How so? It was a ship of the past so of course it would have looked a bit dated compared to DS9. If a modern 2023 Ford mustang traveled back in time to 1965 and met its 1965 counterpart they would look weird together as well. But I don't think the audience would say ....oh my god that old mustang needs to be updated to fit in with modern mustang....:guffaw:
It's not a period piece. It's a future projection of current humanity. The mustang is a very poor comparison.

It's not that it looks dated. It feels completely out of step with TNG and DS9. It feels...like a stage.
 
It's not a period piece. It's a future projection of current humanity. The mustang is a very poor comparison.

It's not that it looks dated. It feels completely out of step with TNG and DS9. It feels...like a stage.

But it's not a poor comparison. TOS is the past of DS9. Again I just showed a video of the TOS Enteprise in Discovery and it fits perfectly fine. In fact it looks way more modern than the discovery itself ..(which is a design almost as old as the TOS constitution class late 70's in fact)

In real life today we don't have any spaceship that looks more modern than TOS Enteprise. Todays actual space ship designs designed by 21st century humans look like penis shaped rockets. :guffaw: (Blue Origin) A fictional ship design by a couple of FX guys in the 1960's looks way more modern for 21st century audiences then the blue origin rocket ...
 
Last edited:
ut it's not a poor comparison. TOS is the past of DS9. Again I just showed a video of the TOS Enteprise in Discovery and it fits perfectly fine. In fact it looks way more modern than the discovery itself ..(which is a design almost as old as the TOS constitution class late 70's in fact)
To you. Not to me. It stands out as a model to me.

A fictional ship design by a couple of FX guys in the 1960's looks way more modern for 21st century audiences then the blue origin rocket ...
Not really, no. The TOS Constitution looks, well, of its time. Not modern.

It looks good, it is iconic, it stands out as a part of history. But, not modern.
 
To you. Not to me. It stands out as a model to me.


Not really, no. The TOS Constitution looks, well, of its time. Not modern.

It looks good, it is iconic, it stands out as a part of history. But, not modern.

Well whatever. But hundreds of people that viewed that Discovery clip would agree with me. I get that when everyone views TOS their heads are stuck in the 1960's. Yes interiors have a lot of 1960's design traits and props. I would never ever expect those interiors to be used verbatim on a modern show. But keeping things at established scale. Like small staterooms and smaller hallways would have went a long way into keeping things from looking too far removed instead of the cavernous interiors they gave us.

Overall they could have found a happier medium.

Anyhow I need to get off the interior thing. Because except for scale I have no real issues with the interior updates.

I just feel overall the original Ent. exterior gets too easily dismissed by fans and producers in newer productions. That's all. I think they could have did a more logical update. Like that YouTube video. That's all I'm saying.
 
It fits with everything that came after just fine. It's before where the problem lies.....

Does it though? It can certainly be argued that the SNW Enterprise fits in alot better.

This clip proves it fits in just fine with most of it's original look.

Honesty? It sticks out like a sore thumb.

It didn't need to be scaled up twice as big

There are a great many who would argure that it did. Stuff just didn't fit inside the smaller scale. A scale that was never all that definitive. Bumping her up to 442m solved most of those issues.

Again I just showed a video of the TOS Enteprise in Discovery and it fits perfectly fine.

not really.

Overall they could have found a happier medium.

I'd say they did.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top