• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Strange New Worlds 2x05 - "Charades"

Place your vote! Now!


  • Total voters
    217
Nearly every Trek series has been male dominated. Is it that bad we're getting female driven ones now? And boy do people like to throw around that w-word a lot. Bring me more Trek like the stuff we got this past week it's what I enjoy.
Funny side-note: I remember Rick Berman stating in an interview they HAD to make all the 90s casts (TNG, DS9, VOY) at LEAST 2/3 male 1/3 female, otherwise the studio was afraid that they were labelled as "women shows" by advertisers and program managers (and that they stuck exactly to that quota, to get as many women main characters as possible).

And now I think of PIC and SNW as "traditional" shows because both have a white, male lead character.

It's very possible to dislike or disagree with the premise of a film or episode yet to find the execution of that premise to be excellent. I didn't really agree with the premise of PIC S3 ("Let's get the band back together"), but I thought it was very well-executed.
I don't know, I didn't find the execution of this particular episode more than average. For a comedy I didn't laugh once, it was mostly medium cringe, not even super cringe, but sometimes unplanned.

However I just love these characters, in their costumes, on these sets, talking about their character drama or weird techno-bubble science. It just gives me a fuzzy warm feeling.

Also I absolutely adore how much of a friggin' dork Pike is - standing in the background giddily presenting his Vulcan cooking attempt:guffaw:

No wonder every woman in "the cage" was lusting after him - I always find him (Jeffrey Hunter) rather dry and boring. But with the new backstory - a hunk of a man that can also cook - I just get it.
I watched the first few scenes with Chapel and Spock from TOS again. It actually fits :shrug:

LwB4G15.png

Their very first scene together. She holds his hands, tells him she loves him. He doesn't resist, doesn't withdraw his hands, doesn't tell her to not touch him. Instead, he gets to a point where he has to tell himself to stay in control.

yi8h54E.png

Chapel jokingly asks him this, to explain why she knows it's Korby's voice. Could easily be irony now, since she knows Spock was engaged. He doesn't say yes or no, just has a surprised face reaction.

y45GWut.png

Note Spock's face as Chapel is about to meet her lover...

eoIHgfX.png

...he does not seem neutral about it.

So there's no obvious reason to assume Spock didn't have any interest in Chapel at all in TOS. Nothing is contradicted, instead it adds to canon, enhances it. Just like Disco showed why Sarek was so opposed to Spock refusing the VSA admission he had saved for him at Burnham's expense.
Damn. Thanks for making me feel really fucking old. I remember nurse Chapel always as relatively old - a mature woman with grey hair. Because I was a teenager when I watched TOS reruns. Now she looks absolutely prime:guffaw:
Honestly, the mistake is that the writers keep trying to make real history and current events match STAR TREK history and current events.

STARGATE SG-1, ATLANTIS, and UNIVERSE never had a real sitting current U.S. President or VP named. Neither did SEVEN DAYS. FARSCAPE didn't have NASA... they had IASA.

And were any of these shows lesser for it? No. In fact, by avoiding stepping on that kind of minefield altogether, the writers were not shackled by histories not quite matching up and were able to tell their stories without having to try to correct errors from a production made almost 60 years ago while that production was telling a story about something they thought could happen fairly far into the future. (The 90s were a quarter of a century in the future when season 1 TOS was made. Same reasoning when DS9's "PAST TENSE" two-parter was made... that was almost 30 years into the future when that was made.)

It would be so much easier on the writers AND the audience if it's just accepted that STAR TREK is an alternate future. It doesn't take away the message that humans can achieve that goal of being better than what we currently are. In fact, I'd say doing this would make it easier to achieve because we wouldn't be comparing histories and saying, "Oh, they got to this point already? We're decades behind from what STAR TREK history says." It puts a timestamp on things and adds a kind of pressure.

By not putting that timestamp, we can focus on the end result instead of the details on getting there.

"Focus on the goal, not the task."
Tanis, "COLD FIRE"
STAR TREK: VOYAGER
I think the difference was that all Farscape, Stargate, Trek and others still were supposed to take place in "our" universe - just the television-brands version of it (with Oceanic Airlines and Red Apple cigarettes).

They weren't really supposed to be alternate dimensions - whenever these shows visited one, they would look obviously different than "our" world, not just "movie different".

PIC season 2 really is the first time Trek does seem set in a parallel universe - but IMO SNW already walked back on that again to realign with "our" world.
 
I think the difference was that all Farscape, Stargate, Trek and others still were supposed to take place in "our" universe - just the television-brands version of it (with Oceanic Airlines and Red Apple cigarettes).

They weren't really supposed to be alternate dimensions - whenever these shows visited one, they would look obviously different than "our" world, not just "movie different".

PIC season 2 really is the first time Trek does seem set in a parallel universe - but IMO SNW already walked back on that again to realign with "our" world.

But that's my point... it doesn't need to align with our world to tell the stories. We can still get the messages and what the story is going for without the need to make it match so much with real life.
 
I know that guys like Justman and Solow have said the network was worried about it.
It was all overly cautious execs worried about ad money. People were (and always have been) more likely to call in complaints. very few people would bother to call in their "likes." Companies were very reluctant to sponsor Nat King Cole's show because of feared reactions in the southern states, but not ONLY the southern states.
 
Also I absolutely adore how much of a friggin' dork Pike is - standing in the background giddily presenting his Vulcan cooking attempt
He's had two episodes this season (this one and the trial one) where he was the absolute MVP just standing the background and reacting!

Damn. Thanks for making me feel really fucking old. I remember nurse Chapel always as relatively old - a mature woman with grey hair. Because I was a teenager when I watched TOS reruns. Now she looks absolutely prime
Apropos of not much, I just discovered that Eddie Murphy was 23-24 when he made Beverly Hills Cop. Even younger in Trading Places and 48 hrs. Blew my mind.

Majel was ~34 in season 2 of TOS. Jess Bush is 31 right now.

Paul Wesley just turned FORTY! So he's five years older than Shatner was in Corbomite Manuever! (And they're ALL way younger than I am!)
 
But that's my point... it doesn't need to align with our world to tell the stories. We can still get the messages and what the story is going for without the need to make it match so much with real life.

The worst offenders are like "Oceans 12", where Julia Roberts plays a character that is mistaken for Julia Roberts the movie star, all while a character played by George Clooney goes unnoticed. That stuff takes me out of the movie.

Media HAS to create a "parallel universe", simply to avoid it's own existence. This applies to ALL media. Differently named presidents, fake brands, companies & media ("Wormhole X-Treme!") are just part of that "game".

However these are still all supposed to play in "our" universe, no matter if it's "Emergency Room", "The crown", "Stranger Things", "Lost in Space" or "The X-Files". And IMO "Star Trek" also belongs there, too.

Whereas stuff like "Game of Thrones", "Man in the high castle" or "For all Mankind" (and PIC season 2 which I absolutely hate for that) are absolutely set in "not our" universe.

As such, Khan leaving to space in 1996 should IMO more be treated like a mistake, like when the Enterprise shot a phaser beam from it's photon torpedo launcher, or when Data mentioned his RAM size, or Khan remembering Chekhov, and not indicative of this being another universe. YMMV obviously.
 
Last edited:
He's had two episodes this season (this one and the trial one) where he was the absolute MVP just standing the background and reacting!
Also shout-out to that fairy-tale episode from season 1, where he plays an absolute cowardly wimp as a background character.

I know going back to a straight, white male leading guy is a bit of a step backwards. But I love how Pike is the absolute positive counter example to toxic masculinity and cringe "tough guys". And still (or because?) manly as hell. Go be proud of your cooking, Sir!
 
Last edited:
Funny side-note: I remember Rick Berman stating in an interview they HAD to make all the 90s casts (TNG, DS9, VOY) at LEAST 2/3 male 1/3 female, otherwise the studio was afraid that they were labelled as "women shows" by advertisers and program managers (and that they stuck exactly to that quota, to get as many women main characters as possible).
Imagine what would have happened if they had added a non-cis-straight character! SHEER MADNESS!
 
Pike has a lot of the qualities I love about Sisko. One of the most important is approachability. For example, you see Sisko host and cook dinner for his crew on multiple occasions. He takes them to baseball games. He finds a cargo bay for O'Brien to convert into an arboretum because he wants to make her happy, and has a heart to heart letting O'Brien know he understands that seeing someone you love being unhappy is difficult and you would do anything to make them happy. Sisko understands that a happy crew is not only a productive crew, but a crew more willing to go that extra mile for even tiny tasks.

Pike is a captain that truly understands this, and he's quickly becoming my second favorite captain.
 
As to some Southern States not airing Plato's Stepchildren, I think that's more of a Star Trek urban myth.

Yep. This is a myth that keeps growing in the retelling, to the extent that too many folks now take for granted that it actually happened.

My understanding is that, yes, there was concern that Southern stations might boycott that episode because of the Kiss. And NBC was braced for lots of angry letters and phone calls. People did indeed worry about what might happen.

But, in the end, there were no boycotts and no big controversy. As historic as that episode was, the response was actually fairly muted at the time.

This is not a very dramatic punchline, however, so, over the years, the fact that NBC was nervous about the Kiss morphed into the myth of widespread boycotts, probably because that makes a better story. As is often the case, a kernel of truth got widely exaggerated over the years.
 
I watched this one the other night and I thought it was pretty good. Excellent performances by the cast. Honestly, the actress who plays T'Pring is absolutely amazing at playing a Vulcan. She somehow has charm, wit, humor, etc all while under the "mask" of the supresed Vulcan. I loved the non-corporeal species the encountered...they were funny and interesting all at once.

Jess Bush is also absolutely amazing in this show.

Here's the catch, though. I don't care about Spock and Chapel as a couple, and I really am starting to get nervous that, only 15 episodes in to the series, we have a whole bunch of T'Pring / Spock / Chapel focus. It just seems weird. I LIKE them in a bubble, but I think this is a well that can't be gone too as often as they are if they want to keep the series fresh and interesting for me. And I get a little tired of "Loss of Control Spock" to be honest.

7/10 Good stuff, nothing shattering though.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top