• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers The Flash (2023) -Review and Discussion Thread

Rating?

  • A*

    Votes: 1 1.9%
  • A

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • A-

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • B+

    Votes: 4 7.7%
  • B

    Votes: 13 25.0%
  • B-

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • C+

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • C

    Votes: 3 5.8%
  • C-

    Votes: 3 5.8%
  • D

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • F

    Votes: 2 3.8%

  • Total voters
    52
I'd argue that Bale came the closest to capturing the essence of the character, at least in Begins. Affleck captured the essence of Frank Miller's Batman relatively well, though that is far from my preferred take on the character. Pattinson has made a good start and I'm looking forward to seeing what he does next with the role. Given Gunn's choice of source material to adapt I am not optimistic that he will develop a definitive take on the Darknight Detective. For me, the animated series remains the quintessential and definitive take on Batman.
 
Yeah, I've seen some people morally tut-tutting the "baby shower" sequence, but I thought it was hilarious and clever, the single best setpiece in the film. It's supposed to be a little shocking and outrageous (putting a bunch of infants in over-the-top mortal jeopardy), but it worked for me in the black-humor spirit intended. As for the effects, the fact that they are less than photorealistic works in the scene's favor, since if it were too believable it would become genuinely horrifying instead of cartoonishly excessive.
I'm surprised people had a problem with that scene I loved it. It was fun, and a nice way to show us how the movie was going to handle Barry's powers, and introduce them for who might be new to the character.
I wasn't that bothered by the effects not being absolutely perfect, even movies with the biggest budgets occaisionally have cartoonish effects in some scene, and as long as they're good enough to get their point across, I'm fine with it.
 
I wasn't that bothered by the effects not being absolutely perfect, even movies with the biggest budgets occaisionally have cartoonish effects in some scene, and as long as they're good enough to get their point across, I'm fine with it.

Right. It seems weird to insist on photorealism when these characters are literal cartoons in their original medium.
 
Agreed, but there has definitely been some pearl-clutching about it. For example, Anthony Desiato, on his Digging for Kryptonite video podcast, was just all appalled and offended, especially by the baby that ended up in the microwave. :shrug:

A podcast -- that explains it. People don't do video podcasts to offer rational, measured views, they do them to generate hits and headlines by manufacturing gratuitous controversies and pretending to be appalled and offended by things. It's not critical discourse, just performative outrage.
 
Eh, Digging for Kryptonite isn't actually like that. It's typically an even-toned, affectionate examination and discussion of Superman's history and lore. I think Desiato -- normally a very mild-mannered guy -- was genuinely offended by The Flash's "baby shower."
 
I'm surprised people had a problem with that scene I loved it. It was fun, and a nice way to show us how the movie was going to handle Barry's powers

Accurate assessment. In every DCEU appearance, Barry was presented as inventive, and heroic as any other JL member. The baby scene was an example of that, even though Barry initially complained about the kind of jobs assigned to him as opposed to a Batman-type mission.

I wasn't that bothered by the effects not being absolutely perfect, even movies with the biggest budgets occaisionally have cartoonish effects in some scene, and as long as they're good enough to get their point across, I'm fine with it.[/QUOTE]

This is where I disagree, since the point of the baby CGI was to look like human babies, not video-gamey approximations of them, which is was the way the babies appeared in this film.
 
Eh, Digging for Kryptonite isn't actually like that. It's typically an even-toned, affectionate examination and discussion of Superman's history and lore. I think Desiato -- normally a very mild-mannered guy -- was genuinely offended by The Flash's "baby shower."

Well, that's just weird. It's not in bad taste if the babies survive the danger. Heroes rescuing babies from danger has been a perennial movie/TV/comics trope for generations, with the runaway stroller heading for traffic probably being the most common variation. And that's a lot scarier than this, because that's something that could really happen, while this is an obviously fanciful, cartoonish exaggeration of danger. (Realistically, if the building's structural supports had given way like that, the entire thing would've pancaked down and the fate of everyone inside would've been far more gruesome.)

I can see how the baby in the microwave could've reminded people of a potential source of fear, but the microwave was unplugged and the baby was only shut in it for a few seconds of real time, so it's not like there was really anything to worry about there.
 
Fun movie but too much CGI.

Clooney should have shaved his beard.

Bummed that we won't be getting more Keaton projects. He was the main draw for me.

Loved Calle's Supergirl.
 
I am still making my way through this thread...less than 2/3 of the way, and have a few things to respond to.

But before that, real quick, wanted to share my own exerience/thoughts. I went with my youngest daughter yesterday at noon. There was like 2 other people in the theater with us.

It was.... decent. Certainly not the greatest Superhero film ever, as Zaslav wanted us to believe (mainly because they couldn't do a tax writeoff like Batgirl, and box office would be the only way to recover financially here)..

My 12 year old daughter felt it was all over the place, and i agree.

Nerdrotic was way more negative than me, but he brought up a few points I strongly agree with, and surprised i didn't see yet in this thread.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

These include (in no particular order):

- The CGI, especially for Nic Cage, looking like Mummy 2: Scorpion King for a long time ago
- Keaton, at least with his scenes saying "THE THING"... it felt like to me as well, like someone had trapped him in an elevator and begged him to say the Batman lines. Normally, i would like those things (like Cyborg's "Booyah" in Whedon League didn't feel QUITE as forced), but yeah, that was totally phoned in.... with a telegraph machine!


Also What i would call soft-Retcon -- details that kinda sorta contradicted what came before (some he covered, some i noticed on my own):

- Iris now actually knew Barry from before, rather than him just seeing her in JL (Snyder extensions)

- Barry was a CSI intern freshmen year (JL made it seem like his full time CSI gig was new, and/or came out of the blue)

- Flash having a superhero name known to the public (negating him learning it in Crisis)

- SO they could spring for cheap CGI, but not a 3 minute scene with Grant Gustin... instead they waste the end credit with a dumb scene with Aquaman (which surely cost more, as Jason Mamoa is a big star now, certainly compared to Grant Gustin)

-speaking of CGI.... while creative in some ways, not sure about those different colored "worlds" with filmstrips representing different realities worked for me or not. It was a lot, so i couldn't really focus, and not sure if that was creative or sloppy.

I am also surprised no one mentioned how Barry is now 1/2 Latino / Nora is a Latina now. I don't have a problem with it, and it was a nice addition for me. But it also seemed to ignore this Barry being Jewish (unless that was just a Whedon joke... though it felt like it came from Ezra Miller).Not a big deal, but just something i noticed that no one else did. (And again I am surprised because surely there was one crazy bigot in the internet who would have made it a big deal, and then thousands of protesters magnifying that to show that so many "fans" are racist)

Also, i didn't see mentioned... but some of the music reminded me of the TV Flash theme, which i thought was interested. Wondering if that was intentional??

Speaking of music, in additon to the Danny lfman theme... we have Wonder Woman's now classic theme. I really hope they carry that over to the new DCOU. That should be as iconic for Wonder Woman as the John Williams theme is for Superman.

For me, it was a B... fun, but not great. My and my daughter had more fun with Shazam 2 and even Black Adam.

i know that technically Aquaman 2 is the end of the DCFU... but i am guessing they are waiting to see how it does before they decide to keep Momoa as Aquaman or shift him to Lobo. I say that because Awuaman was, what, the DCFU's only BILLION dollar movie? And if it can keep most of that... i don't see why they wouldn't want him to make more (or at least lead into the new DCOU... they would retcon after they make the decision).

I have a few replies i want to do from the first 10 pages of comments, but maybe i will wait until someone else posts?
 
Last edited:
SO they could spring for cheap CGI, but not a 3 minute scene with Grant Gustin... instead they waste the end credit with a dumb scene with Aquaman (which surely cost more, as Jason Mamoa is a big star now, certainly compared to Grant Gustin)

The CW/DC productions are not canon in the DCEU. That Miller stunt cameo from a few years back was just that. In no screening of The Flash i've attended, did I see CW/DC characters or events in that "multiverse / timestream" sequence, or any spoken reference to them.

Gods I hate that guy.

Nerdrotic? If you're talking about him, he's a fucking racist, along with his ass-kissing buddies at Geeks and Gamers, The Quartering, The Critical Drinker, Ryan Kinel, Heels vs Babyface, Doomcock, et al. Their driving force in life is to:
  • A) prove how they lack any understanding of the creative process every time they open their maws.
  • B) upload neverending rants about black people, "raceswapping", how "great" 80s movies were (headlined by their white male icons), women having no place in front of or behind the camera because they either do not place men on a pedestal, or its "woke".
  • C) sell themselves as being champions of "respecting source material", yet spit venom at the MCU for any exploration of race issues (dating back to 1969 in the CA comics) and Wilson becoming the new Captain America in the comics long ago.
 
Last edited:
The CW/DC productions are not canon in the DCEU. That Miller stunt cameo from a few years back was just that. In no screening of The Flash i've attended, did I see CW/DC characters or events in that "multiverse / timestream" sequence, or any spoken reference to them.



Nerdrotic? Igf you're talking about him, he's a fucking racist, along with his ass-kissing buddies at Geeks and Gamers, The Quartering, The Critical Drinker, Ryan Kinel, Heels vs Babyface, Doomcock, et al. Their driving force in life is to:
  • A) prove how they lack any understanding of the creative process every time they open their maws.
  • B) upload neverending rants about black people, "raceswapping", how "great" 80s movies were (headlined by their white male icons), women having no place in front of or behind the camera because they either do not place men on a pedestal, or its "woke".
  • C) sell themselves as being champions of "respecting source material", yet spit venom at the MCU for any exploration of race issues (dating back to 1969 in the CA comics) and Wilson becoming the new Captain America in the comics long ago.
Whats Igf? as for 'the fandom menace' they are a lot of cunts and they need to be deplatformed.
 
This is part of what bothers me. Gunn likes to tout himself as a storyteller first and foremost, but it seems as though the integrity of this story and these characters didn't matter to him, because he perceived them as conflicting with his own future plans. It strikes me as a very callous and self-serving attitude to take, and very disrespectful toward this film's creators, the affected characters and actors, and the audience.
But i wonder how much of it was really Gunn, and how much was dictated by Zaslav, who gave Gunn the parameters to work within.
Zaslav was also the one saying this is the greatest Superhero movie of all time, and that this, Shazam 2 and Black Adam were getting enhancements to make them even better.

Some of what Gunn says i think is just trying to please the boss. Some stuff, like how WB was indeed giving just about anyone a license to do something DC related (and giving us the separated mess rather than a cohesive universe like the MCU).

The Flash (2023)

The DCEU continues and ends simultaneously, with far too many numbskulled BTS decisions, altering the outcome of this film.
Yeah, there was just so much that derailed this film... including the multitude of directors that came and went, and Covid, not to mention some of the more "obvious" problems
GREAT: Seeing the proper/prime JL members in action for the last time, and Affleck's all too brief scenes as the perfect Bruce Wayne with his flawless perspective on why no one should manipulate time.

The Wonder Woman theme is always welcome.
I hope they keep this theme....it just feels as much a classic as the John WIlliams Superman theme.
Sasha Calle's Supergirl was wonderful, despite the character having to be thrust into action before she was ready. Still, her performance justifies the original plan to give her a solo film, and makes the decision to cancel that film a major regret, but in the grand scheme of things...SEE NOTES.

Cavil's Superman in news coverage and in the time stream as Clark and Superman.

GOOD:

Ezra Miller's double duty was handled well enough; Prime Barry needing to school his younger self illustrates just how much he's matured since his first, full-on appearance in the DCEU.

Barry's relationship with his mother hit all of the emotional points, with the final grocery store scene being highly effective. Of course, if he had only listened to Bruce, he would have spared himself the painful lesson that you cannot change time and its natural, propulsory framework, which is fate.
Yeah, I felt they did a decent job selling the family love, so it actually mattered to the viewer
So, he believes Bruce is his best friend? We realize he sees Bruce as a mentor, but they have come a long way for Barry to see Bruce in that way.

Well, don't forget, Barry really doesn't have any friends, so at least from Barry;s perspective, that seems true about Bruce. (I think he's too nervous around Diana and too intimidated by Arthur, and they seem to be ignoring Ray FIsher; also Bruce was the one who invited Barry to join)
Only a few things I'd classify as bad, starting with the "wall of noise" that stood in for a score; there was nothing appealing, or memorable about that generic "big movie action score" at all, and is arguably the weakest DCEU score to date.

CG across the board: I was under the impression the glaringly poor CG characters, vehicles, explosions and the stream of time events would have been corrected before this final cut, but sadly, it was not to be the case. While I certainly appreciated seeing the one and only Cavill Superman in news footage, it was so clearly a CG figure that it almost took me out of the film.

The use of Chicago's "25 or 6 to 4" to pump up the elderly Wayne's kitchen fight was flat-out ridiculous, especially if one knows what the song means, and why its not just some accent to a scene.

The rather significant problem with the Clooney cameo is that Barry--having learned a painful lesson about altering timelines--is now obligated to correct it again, unless the story is saying he really did not return to his reality. If he leaves things "as is", it flushes the entire point of his journey into the past, as he would accept altering the life and history of a free individual. If ever there was cause for a Flash sequel (that will never be produced) it is the altered Wayne business.

You are overthinking this... i think this was just a joke. Y'know, the kind you might see in a Whedon movie that you would hate. Kinda like that lasso of truth gag, which totally reminded me of that scene in the Whedon Justice League. Surprised you didn't put this in the "bad"
Some audience members theorized that Clooney was inserted just to hammer home the idea that the Prime DC universe was ending, and/or explained why Affleck's Batman was supposedly cut from the forthcoming Aquaman 2. Who knows at this point.

Keaton quoting lines from the '89 film--was cringeworthy, which the film did not need, considering the gravity of Barry's situation. Thankfully, there's no chance of Keaton returning to the DCEU.

NOTES:

As noted above, Sasha Calle's Supergirl may not get her solo film, but I'm fine with the decision, only because her Supergirl's death--along with her world--was necessary to finally hammer Bruce's words into his head regarding creating more damage, and not accepting the scars that one endures and how they shape a person throughout life.

The alternate earth--with its elderly Batman is not necessarily the one from Burton's awful film, but if it is, then its fate closes a rather permanent lid on the entire, misguided Burton/Schumacher Bat-series.

The multiverse "globe" scene was never the major factor some early screening reviewers suggested it would be. On first viewing, I missed the West Batman, but caught him in this latest screening....if only the CG was not so video-gamey.

I would have preferred to see a Kirk Allyn Superman, and if the producers had to use Reeves, they should have created a color version, instead of using the B&W era as the basis of the CG element, since it suggests the Reeves world is in B&W.

From what I gathered, the CW/Berlanti universe was kicked to the curb, as I did not see any of the main characters or events from that set of series in the film.
Iknow you were totally fine with this... but that was such a missed "freebie" that could have boosted things. When the Flash TV first started, they announced things that got fans riled up (in a good way), which helped propel the show to be the CW's #1 show for a while. And while i was bitter about Ezra Miller being cast, and tossed aside his "MULTIVERSE!" plea, i don't think i was alone when i got super excited when he showed up. Doing a mirror image of that would have created some positive buzz...instead of reminding us what a mess the division of Film and TV was
GRADE(S):

A: For everything in the "GREAT" category.

B: For the "GOOD" elements.

B average for me... the negatives help sabotage the "great"

Strawman argument since the cast and crew have already been paid. (Minus any actors who were looking for Points.) Or do you think the people who made 'Batgirl' got no money for it?

As been said, there are residuals But also just as important as money, is the buzz... so for the director of Batgirl.... many of us saw the work on Ms. Marvel, and certainly made me excited for any future projects. The theatrical release would have helped boost that reputation and give more opportunities.

With Ezra Miller... many of us are conflicted, and they didn't want a good performance by Ezra Miller to cover the crimes of Ezra Miller.

That’s a lot higher than I thought you would give it.

I still find it baffling that they cut Grant Gustin but they kept Zoom. I don’t get the logic behind that
The Ezra Miller version is the favorite for @TREK_GOD_1

I don't understand cutting Grant either.... it was foolish... they could have had them meet with minimal effects, but a whole lot of positive impact.
I wasn’t that impressed with Supergirl. I just didn’t think there was much to her. She was simply there for a plot device.
I don’t know what I was expecting but I was expecting something more with her.

Calle was great, but she was served very poorly by the film (especially in its final Gunn-approved form).
I agree too... a whole lot of stuff didn't make sense... like at what age was she imprisoned? For how long? And how did she know English so well?

I know that the movie industry looks down of TV. Like it’s beneath them or something. It’s just that they insisted that Ezra appear in Crisis. I just thought it would make sense to do vice Versa, considering he got the name “the Flash” from Grant. He never had a superhero name in Justice League.
If it was just movie characters, I would have preferred Routh, Bale or the Twilight guy. It would have been more impactful if it was them and not just poor cgi versions of them.
Yeah, it really makes no sense in ignoring him... though i wonder how it would have fit in.... also, that brings up... would

No Blue Beetle?

This would have been a perfect opportunity for synergy.

I was wrong, but I thought that George Lopez was going to be Ted Kord.
I think they are stratgically making it vague. So if Blue Beetle fails, it goes away with the DCFU. If it is a surprise hit, then he gets to be part of the DCOU. We will know between about Mid-September and Oct 1

"I want these pictures of Supergirl to show our kids."

Words to that effect, in the trailer.
I interpreted that as Barry Allen's future kids (with Younger Barry thinking he and Future Barry would eventually be the same, or something like that... he seemed a lot ditzier than "our" Barry, though)
And yet we're still down from pre Covid levels. Personally I've all but stopped going to the cinema but that's because i'm sick of other people's behaviour in screenings.

Fy6ua5kX0AEwlTW
This is SUCH a classic use of this meme. Had the WB been united... they could have easily fit the TV Flash into that Justice League. I mean, that Barry started off not that much different than the Ezra Miller Version. The show could have had some high class effects thrown in from some movie shots or something. Such a waste...


That's a non sequitur, since Snyder has had nothing to do with the past eight DCEU theatrical releases (aside from what I presume is a token producer credit on Wonder Woman '84). I don't care for Snyder's films, but they make up very much the minority of the DCEU, and there are a number of other DCEU films I've quite enjoyed.

Indeed, part of what I like about the post-Snyder DCEU is that it isn't a single monolithic thing; for the past five years, each film has been allowed to be its own distinct entity, its filmmakers' idiosyncratic creation with minimal connections to any of the others beyond the shared background (although The Flash appears to be very much an exception to that, and Shazam!: Fury of the Gods was to an extent as well).
The problem is, Snyder influenced the first 3 films of the DCFU, deflating what could have been great momentum. As a progressive who believes in Critical Race Theory, you would surely agree that one can still be greatly affected by one's "ancestor", and surely that's what happened with the DCFU.


It was Snyder who cast Miller and each of the Justice Leaguers who appeared in the film, and set the general tone of their characterizations, so rightly or wrongly, Snyder will get the credit or the blame for most of the DCEU even when other directors have taken what he established and built upon them.

@Supervisor 194 has it right.

@Christopher you seem to have completely forgotten that Snuder fans helped bring us the Zack Snyder Justice League on the then HBOMAX.

Also, a lot of the hate and loss of momentum of the DCFU was due to those major missteps starting at Man of Steel, and they never recovered from.

I have been critical of much of his approach to this universe but I think he utterly nailed the casting. I think time will be kinder even to Jesse Eisenberg’s controversial Lex Luthor than critics and fans were at the time.
I very much agree on that... I mean, i do have problems with Eisenberg's Luthor, but in light of the follow 3 1/2 years of the US presidency, his Luthor seems very realistic... he was just a bit ahead of his time, and a little off ("very stable genius")

I think the success or failure of Snyder's casting depends upon if one likes his takes on the characters. I don't like the Aqua-Dude-Bro take on the King of the Seven Seas, so I don't particularly think Momoa is great casting. I don't really care for Snyder's take on any of the Justice Leaguers with a possible exception for Wonder Woman, so his casting choices fall flat for me. That being said, his choices do portray what he directed them to portray.
I can understand why you say that. But for me, who grew up with Aquaman being a joke, Momoa is the polar opposite. ANd is he's like the "bad boy"Jason in Battle of the Planets...and a real good contrast to Ezra Miller's Barry Allen, and the rest of the League.
Casting is one of the few things I think Snyder did superbly. There are other things, like basic storytelling, that I think he's dreadful at. No person is just one thing. And the DCEU is not just one thing. Snyder is merely one of the many factors that went into it. It makes no more sense to give him all the credit or blame than it would to deny his contributions entirely.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
So it's Ryan George's fault!!! Man... this is so one the nose in a lot of ways. It definitely feels like it was jinxed from the start.
 
you seem to have completely forgotten that Snuder fans helped bring us the Zack Snyder Justice League on the then HBOMAX.

Which was and remains a monumentally bitter pill to those who made Kleenex's investors a fortune crying about Snyder's vision, as no studio was going to greenlight a director's vision (pretty much adding another film's length and correcting Whedon's endless screw-ups of Snyder's intent for the film) if there was not significant audience support. Fans were fully supportive of Snyder's DCEU and wanted to see the natural continuation in his Justice League. Meanwhile, most of the other DCEU films not directly associated with Synder's narrative are not receiving support of that magnitude.


I mean, i do have problems with Eisenberg's Luthor, but in light of the follow 3 1/2 years of the US presidency, his Luthor seems very realistic... he was just a bit ahead of his time, and a little off ("very stable genius")

Eisenberg's Luthor was the perfect one of this era: a full-on representation of certain real world tech bros executives, who (through their inventions or products) plot the fate of all others with no regard for personal autonomy, usually militant atheists, and have the social interaction skills of a spoiled child. Eisenberg's Luthor fit this era like a glove. Perfect casting and character development.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top