Given that this series hadn't been filmed yet in 1966, I don't think there would be a way for Uhura to act that way in TOS. And TOS wasn't exactly a continuity poster child to begin with. For that, I'm grateful that they were interested in story first.
I get that, and I'm not complaining; I love this show for what it is, and naming Uhura in my previous post was a bad example, but...
And they always will, the needs of the story trumps the needs of slavish devotion to continuity every time. Thankfully
...I just wonder who some of the references that sort-of-but-don't-quite tie in to TOS are for? Why does M'Benga need to be M'Benga? Why are Uhura and Chapel on the ship at this point when their characters don't need to be Uhura and Chapel? None of those things are at all necessary - so far - to Telling a Good Story. It reminds me of the 1996 Doctor Who TV Movie's unnecessary "kisses to the past", or in this case, the future, that didn't quite line up anyway, but I'm eager to see what they do with the characters.
I'm all for Story First before slavish devotion to continuity, but what I'm seeing is a fair amount of slapdash devotion to continuity.