This is one of a few reasons why I don't think he's dead.Random thought - if Shaw can be saved by using sevens nanoprobes that would be a pretty ironic twist considering his backstory.
This is one of a few reasons why I don't think he's dead.Random thought - if Shaw can be saved by using sevens nanoprobes that would be a pretty ironic twist considering his backstory.
Don't worry, they won't.She's died twice already, three if you count off-screen shenanigans in BoBW. Maybe they'll finally explain how that works.
Plot device to put Geordi's daughters in jeopardy.Really think the under-25 bit is just a twist on the ubiquitous "bratty-kids-save-the-world" trope.
PICARD: Lutan, we can provide you with records of her death and how Doctor Crusher brought her back.Usually wide open eyes like Shaw’s mean the character is dead.
I hope they get them back, I really loved Geordi and his daughters.Plot device to put Geordi's daughters in jeopardy.
I'm not as down on Seasons 1 and 2 (particularly 2) as much as other people. The foundation of everything is that Patrick Stewart didn't want to do a TNG reunion show, particularly for Season 1. We got Season 3 as is because, it being the last ride, he relented.Yeah...but Akiva Goldsman was the main showrunner. Matalas departed early to work on season 3. He had nothing to do with the season finale.
Really think the under-25 bit is just a twist on the ubiquitous "bratty-kids-save-the-world" trope.
I'm ready for Starfleet: Assisted Living.It's that one guy's campaign against the Starfleet Academy show!
Makes sense. We did see a transfer of her consciousness in Season 2. Guess we just have to assume such things have happened before... off screen.For myself, the Borg Queen is software and what we see, the female form, is the hardware holding that software. If one queen dies, the software is transmitted to a new form and, viola, a new queen.
But that being said, the contrast between 1/2 and 3 is the difference between getting two randos doing Star Trek and an actual Trek guy.
Like who the fuck is Michael Chabon? He wrote some fucking book? Who gives a fuck. Sure he's a Trek fan... a casual Trek fan. The JJ Abrams kind that is a little embarrassed by Trek being Trek which is why Season 1 is so differentff. His involvement in Season 1 really seems like he opted to do the show to slap a line on his resume to try and move up in Hollywood.
Akiva Goldsman is actually the real deal as a writer for Hollywood with a lot of great work under him, and unlike Chabon, put a lot more "Trek" in Season 2. Not at all surprising really, because his prior work showed him as someone who does study and utilize the "lore" of the worlds he's writing in (Transformers, Dark Tower, Batman). But he apparently got overwhelmed in Season 2 with Trek lore, which is when Matalas was brought in. Again, a non-Trek guy got lost.
Finally for S3, they bring on a Trek guy in Matalas, who righted the ship, because he - and by his own mouth David Blass - get Trek. All Trek is a period piece about the future, with rules, a history and design language. If you aren't willing to follow that, why do Trek? Everytime some Jabroni tries, it blows up in their face.
Hopefully Paramount learned its lesson. The Berman era happened because Rick Berman, for all his faults, assembled a team that stuck together for 18 years and produced 4 shows and 5 movies (if you count TUC). That created a consistency that has only been matched in the history of film by Marvel in the MCU, and more recently in Star Wars in the Rogue One-Mandalorian era (largely again,because of two people; Dave Filoni and Jon Favreau). That's YEARS after the Berman era.
Trek is finally on good footing with Strange New Worlds, Prodigy, LD and Picard Season 3. Discovery Season 3 and 4 were vast improvements and I have high hopes for 5, but Discovery's Season 1 and 2 production issues and changes in direction make it a damaged show in an enduring sense. Hopefully, Paramount knows that if they want to do Trek well, they need Trek people working on Trek, and cultivating the next creative talent who will stick with the franchise for years.We can call it the MCU/Star Wars model, but really, it's the Rick Berman model. And it works.
I agree. Poor Geordi.Geordi had a hard time getting parts from Autozone
More like a "Administrative AI" that controls every single Drone / Computer in the network.it’s clear the Borg Queen is more so a transitive consciousness able to be passed from host to host
I don't think the Borg Queen is even that.For myself, the Borg Queen is software and what we see, the female form, is the hardware holding that software. If one queen dies, the software is transmitted to a new form and, viola, a new queen.
Or the whole Spock not really being dead thing. As many have said already, nobody ever really dies in Star Trek. Nobody really important anyway. Until they serve a larger plot, that is.True. And one could say that it would ruin the emotional impact of the Seven/Shaw scene, but since they keep resurrecting Data, they obviously don't think it's all that bad.
I'm betting it'll be an hour tops.I'm hoping it's either double length or at least 1.5 times normal length.
Why? Because I want Trek to being neck deep in Trek? If I want to watch people cavorting around present day Los Angeles, there's fifteen different police procedurals for me to choose from.Oh how I wish this board had a dislike button
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.