• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Paramount apparently still doesn't get it...

Best to not even compare or analyze these new CBSALLACCESS+ Trek to the phenomenal stuff done from TOS to TNG. Trek was running out of ideas since VOY, and the franchise declined from there; while JJTrek gave it a jump to the heart by the time the 3rd one came around the franchise seem to return back to the bottom. It was no question CBSAA+ Trek was creatively bankrupt from the start distancing themselves away from what was tried and true to more of the Star Wars clichés serializing Star Trek.

I came to terms with these things during PICARD season 1, they're lazy, overblown galaxy threatening plots drenched with nostalgia bait. It's creative bankruptcy at it's heights, but I'm okay with that and now with PICARD, and I'll never watch the other CBS+Trek shows, I'm just watching those shiny little lights* and don't even care or invest in those ridiculous plots because it's not coming from something new and fresh. It's borrowing heavily from a point in time of Star Trek when they did it a lot better.

*Visual Effects
Did they change the name again?
 
I’m not saying it’s not clear. I’m saying it doesn’t make sense. If you have to go to that much effort, why not just build a new ship?

It’s a paper-thin line intended to handwave away why the Enterprise looks so different.
I don’t know. The shape and size is still close enough that I could buy it’s most of the same skeleton, spaceframe and components/structures under the skin, just with enough “peripherals” changes — surface plates and mounted components, internal interface systems and decor — to visibly change the ship’s look and performance, while still being less of a use of resources than constructing an entirely new ship would be. (It’s harder to buy when changing the Titan from Luna- to Constitution III-class, where it looks like half the skeleton itself must have been changed and the rest rearranged, but then I’m no Starfleet engineer.)
 
I don’t know. The shape and size is still close enough that I could buy it’s most of the same skeleton, spaceframe and components/structures under the skin, just with enough “peripherals” changes — surface plates and mounted components, internal interface systems and decor — to visibly change the ship’s look and performance, while still being less of a use of resources than constructing an entirely new ship would be. (It’s harder to buy when changing the Titan from Luna- to Constitution III-class, where it looks like half the skeleton itself must have been changed and the rest rearranged, but then I’m no Starfleet engineer.)
Is Robin Curtis a plausible refit of Kirsty Alley, though?
 
Is Robin Curtis a plausible refit of Kirsty Alley, though?

Yeah, but that’s an actor recast; it’s understood not to be a change “in-universe”. Whereas the Enterprise refit is called out in dialogue as a change that “really happened”, so they’re not pretending that it always looked that way.
 
(And if back in high school I wrote a short piece of fanfiction about how there was a terrible accident on board the Enterprise on the way home from the Mutara sector, and McCoy had to pretty much rebuild Saavik’s face resulting in a completely new look, we can just ignore that now in tolerant silence, I hope.)
 
Is Robin Curtis a plausible refit of Kirsty Alley, though?

No. They are clearly two different people who happen to have the same name and are female Vulcans. Other than that, there isn’t much similarity between the portrayal of Alley’s Saavik and Curtis’s Saavik.
 
No. They are clearly two different people who happen to have the same name and are female Vulcans. Other than that, there isn’t much similarity between the portrayal of Alley’s Saavik and Curtis’s Saavik.
So, "Saavik" on Vulcan is like Mary in the USA (who also happens to be a Lt. in Starfleet...hanging out on the Genesis Mission...<Small Universe Syndrome.>
 
The refit is am OK explanation. It is not a perfect one. The uniforms, design language, equipment changes, and the like are not explained. Spicks ceremony not well explained.

It is just close enough.
 
The refit in TMP explains why the Enterprise looks different but it doesn’t explain why the rest of the Federation looks completely different than in TOS.
Aside from architecture being different in San Francisco than on Starbase 11–rather like how Paris today looks rather different from, I don’t know, Caumsett State Park today—how so? Starfleet changed its uniforms across the board, as they are wont to do every thirty minutes or so, and space station architecture in Trek was largely established in TMP. K-7 is rounder like the TOS Enterprise is, but for all we know it got “angularfied” later in much the same way that the Enterprise did; its hub-and-surrounding-disks structure certainly matches the basic shape of most of the stations we see in the movies and later series.
 
The refit is am OK explanation. It is not a perfect one. The uniforms, design language, equipment changes, and the like are not explained. Spicks ceremony not well explained.

It is just close enough.
“They love to change things…”. Done!
 
The Enterprise has well known transformational abilities.
lW508Cg.jpg

apADkTC.jpg
 
Last edited:
Best to not even compare or analyze these new CBSALLACCESS+ Trek to the phenomenal stuff done from TOS to TNG. Trek was running out of ideas since VOY, and the franchise declined from there; while JJTrek gave it a jump to the heart by the time the 3rd one came around the franchise seem to return back to the bottom. It was no question CBSAA+ Trek was creatively bankrupt from the start distancing themselves away from what was tried and true to more of the Star Wars clichés serializing Star Trek.

I came to terms with these things during PICARD season 1, they're lazy, overblown galaxy threatening plots drenched with nostalgia bait. It's creative bankruptcy at it's heights, but I'm okay with that and now with PICARD, and I'll never watch the other CBS+Trek shows, I'm just watching those shiny little lights* and don't even care or invest in those ridiculous plots because it's not coming from something new and fresh. It's borrowing heavily from a point in time of Star Trek when they did it a lot better.

*Visual Effects

There is no such thing as CBS+ or CBSAA+. CBS All-Access changed its name to Paramount+. That is all.

Yeah, but that’s an actor recast; it’s understood not to be a change “in-universe”. Whereas the Enterprise refit is called out in dialogue as a change that “really happened”, so they’re not pretending that it always looked that way.

The Enterprise has well know transformational abilities.
lW508Cg.jpg

apADkTC.jpg

Amazing how people demand that spin-offs of a television series produced almost sixty years, ten U.S. presidents, and twelve British prime ministers ago display a level of visual continuity that that almost-old-enough-to-collect-Social-Security television series did not itself display.

Yeah, but that’s an actor recast; it’s understood not to be a change “in-universe”.
So sometimes the audience is just supposed to suspend disbelief and accept that things look different to them but not in-universe.

Hm.

Hmm.

Hmm.
 
Amazing how people demand that spin-offs of a television series produced almost sixty years, ten U.S. presidents, and twelve British prime ministers ago display a level of visual continuity that that almost-old-enough-to-collect-Social-Security television series did not itself display.
I don't think that's quite a Mandela effect but maybe rose tinted glasses of some kind in remembering just how well things stuck together? Or that these changes did not warrant any commentary. Which is closer to what I think because it's a dramatic presentation. Or did people think there was a transporter inside the turbolift as in "The Menagerie" when Spock is rolling Pike off screen and the shot moves to Kirk watching Pike walking away with Vina on the viewscreen. Quite the fast movements by Spock!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top