Rules - A Short Guide To Posting on the BBS | The Trek BBSI disagree but whatever.
Rules - A Short Guide To Posting on the BBS | The Trek BBSI disagree but whatever.
How about instead of a Titan series...Shaw (along with Seven and his crew) get given a new ship for helping with whatever is happening in Picard.
The new ship: The USS Enterprise G.
It's mentioned in the logs that the Enterprise F is retiring soon.
I think they wanted to honour the F by including it in the show, but they want to make their own design for a new main Enterprise for a show.
Oh please. You want to talk about a Star Trek time period that's been done to death? Comparatively to the 23rd Century era, which has 117 live action episodes, (127 if you include the produced but unaired SNW season 2 episodes), and six feature films, the 24th century era has 556 live action episodes (after Picard season 3 finishes) and four feature films.
If there's any era in Star Trek thats been done to death doesn't need to be revisited, it's the 24th+ century era.
The 24th+ century though is kind've seen as the "present" of Star Trek and there are people who would rather see what happens next in the early 25th century than go back to the past in the Star Trek narrative. Because the 24th century was so developed people may also more invested in that time period and the species that have had a major role (Cardassians, Ferengi, Klingons, etc...). This is just my opinion, but I'd be interested in an episode covering what happened to Cardassia after the Dominion war. This has not been mentioned in over 20 years and is more interesting to me, because of how central they were to the story of the Alpha Quadrant in the 24th century, than random adventures with characters that were introduced in the 60s and takes place 100 years in the "past"
It's only seen as the "present" by people who can't stop beating a dead horse.
It's not the present. It's part of the Star Trek universe.
And it's past time to leave it alone.
Disagree. The 25th century hasn't been explored.
It seems like there's an obvious way to give DS9 fans a new series that tells the tale of what happens next in the 25th century, without just making it another exploration-based show. Put it on a space station near the centre of events that interest multiple empires (but no wormholes this time). Seven can be the Commander Sisko character.
That just makes it even more crucial that this exists, and it runs simultaneously for at least five years.They're already doing a Babylon 5 reboot
did they ever get that off the ground? the reboot?They're already doing a Babylon 5 reboot
I actually have no idea. I was moreso making a joke. I think it's back in development hell.did they ever get that off the ground? the reboot?
That just makes it even more crucial that this exists, and it runs simultaneously for at least five years.
This time they should call it Deep Space Ten, so it's twice as good as Babylon 5.That just makes it even more crucial that this exists, and it runs simultaneously for at least five years.
I'm not over Deep Space Nine either, so I can relate.Do you really want to put with JMS's bitching for another five years though? That guy still isn't over Deep Space Nine
That's how you get a Babylon 15.This time they should call it Deep Space Ten, so it's twice as good as Babylon 5.
I think if a 25th century spin off does happen, it will be about Seven and she won't be in Starfleet
Why are people so obsessed with making a Seven of Nine Trek series?Put it on a space station near the centre of events that interest multiple empires (but no wormholes this time). Seven can be the Commander Sisko character.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.