Yes, of course it was. I usually refer to Kevin J. Anderson as KJA because it's easier than typing his name out all the time. People usually know who I'm talking about.A certain author of Star Wars books used the same term. I wonder who used it first.
Edit: the internet says it was the dynamic duo.
Well, it didn't help when KJA started calling us "Talifans" for not liking the nuDune books. Insulting the people you're hoping will help put food on your table by buying your books is never a smart idea.
Oh, please. It didn't matter to him if the critical review or post came from someone who was polite about it or basically said, "this is a piece of shit." He used that term for all of us.Having personally met KJA, I find it doubtful that he would've made such a comment without cause or provocation.
^ To clarify, I wasn't condoning his comments, merely stating my opinion that I don't think he would have engaged in toxic behavior unprovoked.
Provoked or otherwise, however, I do agree that comments like that are unproductive and only feed into the fractured nature of the Dune fandom and fandom toxicity in general.
So you're still excusing him? I could see him getting pissed at specific people; I know of a couple who have been incredibly rude to him, one crossing the line in so many ways by posting online attacks against KJA's wife. That's not okay. She didn't write the books, and I've never heard that she engaged in blanket insults of people who don't like his books.To clarify, I wasn't condoning his comments, merely stating my opinion that I don't think he would have engaged in toxic behavior unprovoked.
Yep.Provoked or not if you start to call your customers/readers names you will lose in public opinion.
Provoked or not if you start to call your customers/readers names you will lose in public opinion.
So you're still excusing him?
Not that I know of, but his pal Karen Traviss used the term for her own detractors.Did he use "Talifans" to describe people who didn't like his Star Wars books?
I have never heard of her. What does she write?Not that I know of, but his pal Karen Traviss used the term for her own detractors.
Depends greatly on the person and the book.I take it people don't care for her Star Wars books any more than they do his?
From what I've heard over the years, I think it mostly had something to do with her novels having some weird axe to grind about how she thought Jedi were dumb and Space-Viking-Spartans-Mando were the best thing ever, and their dad could totally beat up the Jedi's dad. That's about the tone I get from what little I've read, anyway.EDIT: It's okay; I just looked her up on Amazon. I take it people don't care for her Star Wars books any more than they do his?
She should take a leaf from Diane Duane, who wrote about the Romulan culture in her Rihannsu novels many years before TNG and the other modern shows made them into militaristic Vulcans with all-identical hairstyles, goofy foreheads, and an incredibly bad fashion sense.I also read that she got really really pissed when they brought the Mandalorians onto Clone Wars, and they were totally different from the versions she wrote in her books.
Fans and authors could learn from this. I never understood only wanting one interpretation of a fictional work. Diane's Romulans sounds interesting and appealing to me as a TOS Romulan fan. But TNG was fine too, as aliens go on that series.Yet Duane never stomped around, calling people names if they didn't like her novels.
I have never heard of her. What does she write?
EDIT: It's okay; I just looked her up on Amazon. I take it people don't care for her Star Wars books any more than they do his?
It's safe to say that most authors that write for existing franchises know the score, know they're playing with someone else's toys and have no ownership of what they invent.Fans and authors could learn from this. I never understood only wanting one interpretation of a fictional work. Diane's Romulans sounds interesting and appealing to me as a TOS Romulan fan. But TNG was fine too, as aliens go on that series.
As for Dune, the original was fine for me. Any further novels felt after the fact.
What I don't forgive is KJA/BH's attempts to de-canonize FH's work. Writing a scene in Paul of Dune that dismisses Dune as nothing more than in-universe political/religious propaganda Irulan wrote at Paul's orders and that only the KJA/BH version (ie. the Houses trilogy) is correct is a slap in the face to the older fans and spitting on Frank Herbert himself. You cannot convince me that anything they wrote was part of The Holy Notes That Frank Left. Trying to erase some of the established facts about the main characters and changing the basics about the Bene Gesserit are NOT okay with quite a few fans. And then going on to insult said fans when we made our views known... and KJA wonders why some the fans dislike him so much?It's safe to say that most authors that write for existing franchises know the score, know they're playing with someone else's toys and have no ownership of what they invent.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.