Not until this season.which I think is liked much more overall.
Not until this season.which I think is liked much more overall.
I think that is due to Patrick Stewart not doing any more than 3 seasons.Jonathan Frakes says it "sucks" and "don't hold your breath" for anything else in the 32nd century. Link.
Star Trek Picard is about to end on the grand total of 30.
At the beginning of production, but he's said recently he would like to do more stories.I think that is due to Patrick Stewart not doing any more than 3 seasons.
More than the 3 seasons of Picard? Or something else? Are you saying that Stewart wants to do a 4th season, but they cancelled it anyway?At the beginning of production, but he's said recently he would like to do more stories.
No, they're looking at other show possibilities and Stewart is open to returning.More than the 3 seasons of Picard? Or something else? Are you saying that Stewart wants to do a 4th season, but they cancelled it anyway?
No he wants to do things post-Picard.More than the 3 seasons of Picard? Or something else? Are you saying that Stewart wants to do a 4th season, but they cancelled it anyway?
I'm really beginning to wonder now, between Frake's words here and Calypso, if the 32nd century seasons are going to be retconned into being an alternate timeline rather than let Trek connect the dots all the way up to the Burn. If Trek doesn't keep 32nd century Trek alive in screens in the future, it's going to be less relevant as time goes on and future writers might not want to be tied down to Discovery's later season canon.Jonathan Frakes says it "sucks" and "don't hold your breath" for anything else in the 32nd century. Link.
Why? That's a long ass time to explore.all the way up to the Burn.
Well, since he's an android, maybe they'll turn off his timer and have him show up on the final of Discovery.No he wants to do things post-Picard.
It wouldn't be a retcon.I'm really beginning to wonder now, between Frake's words here and Calypso, if the 32nd century seasons are going to be retconned into being an alternate timeline rather than let Trek connect the dots all the way up to the Burn. If Trek doesn't keep 32nd century Trek alive in screens in the future, it's going to be less relevant as time goes on and future writers might not want to be tied down to Discovery's later season canon.
Discovery was a prequel, any changes made to the timeline in that show already happened from the perspective of TOS onward.Using Star Trek's own rules for Time Travel, we've been in an alternate timeline since Burnham's mother first used the Red Angel suit to save her life in the deserts of Vulcan.
No he wants to do things post-Picard.
I definitely think someone is eventually gonna do a show that messes with Disco 32nd canon.I'm really beginning to wonder now, between Frake's words here and Calypso, if the 32nd century seasons are going to be retconned into being an alternate timeline rather than let Trek connect the dots all the way up to the Burn. If Trek doesn't keep 32nd century Trek alive in screens in the future, it's going to be less relevant as time goes on and future writers might not want to be tied down to Discovery's later season canon.
Well, let's see. Picard's already ending. Lower Decks is cheaper to make. So that leaves Prodigy, Discovery, and SNW. Prodigy and SNW will have two seasons, DSC will have five. If you have to cut one more out, which one do you cut? The ones that just started or the one that's been on for years and more-or-less ran its course? You cut the one that ran its course.Well there was clearly a problem with the show otherwise it would not be on the chopping block.
For visuals maybe, they care about the actual lore. Several things invented by Picard made it into Discovery.It's not like CBS is all that concerned with inter-show continuity as it is.
For visuals maybe, they care about the actual lore. Several things invented by Picard made it into Discovery.
According to the novel writers Paramount cares that the books don't violate canon, so why would they care about that and not the shows themselves?CBS themselves do not care about 'lore.' Anything that crosses over between shows is the product of the writers and showrunners, not CBS.
According to the novel writers Paramount cares that the books don't violate canon, so why would they care about that and not the shows themselves?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.