259x151x41 meters
That makes a lot more sense given the size of features like the bridge dome.
259x151x41 meters
The first two have somewhat of a resemblance to Species-8472 Ships.
The Shang II Titan's registry number has been confirmed by production sources.Which isn't canon either. The gold models aren't labelled.![]()
Yeah, but if it isn’t on screen it isn’t canon.The Shang II Titan's registry number has been confirmed by production sources.
Well, the Titan is a Connie III. It only stands to reason they would resemble each other.The greatest problem with potential spin-off Star Trek Titan is that hero ship Titan-A looks so similiar to hero ship Enterprise in SNW. We would have two shows with ship that actually has no real difference, especially when we talk about 150 years of difference. Up is Titan, down is Enterprise. Where is design imagination of producers? In 1980s they created master peace Enteprise D. Titan-A is just an small upgrade to original Constitution.
![]()
Those are the old rules. Canon is what Paramount says, and Paramount says these production source pronouncements are, in fact, canon.Yeah, but if it isn’t on screen it isn’t canon.
Which Paramount has not said have changed.Those are the old rules.
Where?and Paramount says these production source pronouncements are, in fact, canon.
Sounds like we have another BoP scaling war on our hands...lol...FX team says she was rendered at 119 meters.
FX team says she was rendered at 119 meters.
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-tos-saavik-captain-titan/Which Paramount has not said have changed.
Where?
That isn't a direct paramount source.https://screenrant.com/star-trek-tos-saavik-captain-titan/
This article refers to the "official" instagram posts by production sources. The article must have been approved by Paramount or it would have been taken down/edited until it was.
The old Star Trek.com canon page has been taken down as that policy is no longer in effect.
Again, times change.
I disagree. it clearly has less decks than the NX-01.I'm sure they did. But the design cues make it look larger than that.
Tuesday.Kind of wish those orthos didn’t have callouts. I like clean orthos.![]()
The official Length is 119.X meters, that's stated by one of the production designers on the show.Here's a set of orthos Drexler posted online. Using a 3/ airlock height for reference, shes 259x151x41 meters
![]()
Always mutable.Those are the old rules. Canon is what Paramount says, and Paramount says these production source pronouncements are, in fact, canon.
Times change.
I remember that from the DVD slip cover!But Enterprise was the only series that gave a damn about keeping sizes and look constant.
I disagree. it clearly has less decks than the NX-01.
The official Length is 119.X meters, that's stated by one of the production designers on the show.
So you need to re-adjust your LxWxH to match the stated "Official Length"
Didn't Enterprise claim the Defiant was 400ish metres long?The original Connie was 289m and refit was 305m by official paramount production sources for decades .. See how well that turned out.
Sorry.. But Enterprise was the only series that gave a damn about keeping sizes and look constant.
They never gave a length on screen, but Doug Drexler's cutaway of the Connie which was used in that episode is scaled to 400 range so the TOS set heights can fit inside.Didn't Enterprise claim the Defiant was 400ish metres long?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.