I think it was said elsewhere that he's not a fan of multi-Doctor stories.It’s not a slight of anyone, he’s just expressing a personal opinion.
This is where I am, I dipped with Matt Smith around his second series and Capaldi had some brilliant stuff but it was just too uneven, so I never even watched Whittaker.I only watched the 1st and last eps of Whittaker's first year and wasn't so keen on the show anymore. But, Tenant is my second fav Doc (after Pertwee) and I think the RTD years were pretty well done, so, I'm planning to watch this whole 3-ep "mini season" they've cooked up. Then I'll give the next guy a chance and we'll see...
Or a TARDIS.Carl, the mysterious time traveller in S3 of DISCO, could surely require little hand waving to be retconned into a renegade Time Lord, if anyone were so inclined!
While the actual Star Trek crossover is unlikely, I do hope we get the "Trek Lite" version of the episode RTD discussed in The Writer's Tale. Basically, the Doctor arrives on a starship which is very obviously "similar but legally distinct from" a Starfleet ship. But I guess even that might these days be considered too similar to The Orville.Maybe we'll get that Star Trek crossover RTD wanted during the run of Enterprise.
I'm kidding, probably even less likely now than it was back then.
Well, we did get that, albeit as a side piece, in "A Christmas Carol."While the actual Star Trek crossover is unlikely, I do hope we get the "Trek Lite" version of the episode RTD discussed in The Writer's Tale. Basically, the Doctor arrives on a starship which is very obviously "similar but legally distinct from" a Starfleet ship. But I guess even that might these days be considered too similar to The Orville.
While the actual Star Trek crossover is unlikely, I do hope we get the "Trek Lite" version of the episode RTD discussed in The Writer's Tale. Basically, the Doctor arrives on a starship which is very obviously "similar but legally distinct from" a Starfleet ship. But I guess even that might these days be considered too similar to The Orville.
Yeah, same here. I would one solid exception for Trek and the comic crossover they did, but only because it's in the past and all. Beyond that, I would argue Blake's Seven is also a good fit. But aside Blake's Seven and Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, I wouldn't mesh it with much else either.I think Who is a terrible fit for other franchises. With the possible exception of Hitchikers Guide.
With the Disney+ thing, Baby Yoda's more likely to get a TARDIS trip than any Trek character.Maybe we'll get that Star Trek crossover RTD wanted during the run of Enterprise.
I'm kidding, probably even less likely now than it was back then.
With the Disney+ thing, Baby Yoda's more likely to get a TARDIS trip than any Trek character.
I know BF have the rights to produce Blakes 7 stuff but does anyone know if they have the full rights?
They show very little understanding of the show, its setting, its characters, basic science...
As I understand it, they can only use elements of the first three seasons of B7, so there are definite limits. That said, Paul Darrow was allowed to write a post-Gauda Prime trilogy of novels, but based on the first one, the only one I've been able to bring myself to read, BF could always just claim that they're not really B7 novels. They show very little understanding of the show, its setting, its characters, basic science...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.