• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Lower Decks 3x01 - "Grounded"

Rate the episode...


  • Total voters
    119
I see. So I was supposed to find Bateson's use funny, and not at all out of place, because humor. Gotcha.
No. My comment about everyone being a commando was meant as humor, i.e not to be taken as support of the decision in episode. A joke, perhaps, or tongue in cheek commentary.
 
but this is pretty much in the concept of Lower Decks, where the main characters are supposed to be in the dark about the important stuff.

Oh I completely agree and I'm conflicted about it, because part of the running gag, as you say, is that they're supposed to be in the dark. On occasion though they did manage to write these characters into bigger missions like Tendi being mistakenly taken along on a Romulan infiltration mission or the part that Rutherford played in the same episode with his glitching cyborg attachment. Then there's the times when they're lampooning around whilst we're seeing the otherside of the story play out with the bridge crew at the same time so we as viewers get a rounded view of what's going on.

I think they ended season 2 on a cliffhanger, making some pretty big statements, we've waited a year for this, the trailers implied a big rescue (yeah I know...trailers...) and then they handwave it all away with some really dense exposition in the last two minutes of the episode. I thought the episode was fun, it's not that I didn't enjoy what there was, I just don't think it serviced what they set up as well as it could have done.
 
I think I've decided the issue I have with Lower Decks humor...how despite loving the show, I don't really think it's very funny.

The problem is - at least for me - bust-a-gut humor comes from something unexpected and absurd happening. While I won't call the show completely predictable by any means, there's generally speaking very little absurdist humor involved. Indeed, I think humor based upon Trek deep cuts/references is about as far away from absurdism as you can get.

The show hits the spot in terms of humor sometimes (the dolphins from last season were awesome!) but it's just more cute/charming than hilarious. Of course, most stuff intended as comedy isn't particularly funny, so this isn't the biggest slight.
 
I think I've decided the issue I have with Lower Decks humor...how despite loving the show, I don't really think it's very funny.

The problem is - at least for me - bust-a-gut humor comes from something unexpected and absurd happening. While I won't call the show completely predictable by any means, there's generally speaking very little absurdist humor involved. Indeed, I think humor based upon Trek deep cuts/references is about as far away from absurdism as you can get.

The show hits the spot in terms of humor sometimes (the dolphins from last season were awesome!) but it's just more cute/charming than hilarious. Of course, most stuff intended as comedy isn't particularly funny, so this isn't the biggest slight.

I laugh a lot more at wit and sarcasm than I do at absurd or referential humor, so yeah, I get some of this. I think a big reason it works for me on LDS because the pacing. A lot of times, referential humor feels like there's a pause, waiting for the audience to laugh at something that's not particularly funny, but LDS moves so fast that the nod never has time to thud - by the time I've registered whatever they're referencing and gone, "aw, neat!", we're on our way to the next thing.
 
Last edited:
I think I've decided the issue I have with Lower Decks humor...how despite loving the show, I don't really think it's very funny.

The problem is - at least for me - bust-a-gut humor comes from something unexpected and absurd happening. While I won't call the show completely predictable by any means, there's generally speaking very little absurdist humor involved. Indeed, I think humor based upon Trek deep cuts/references is about as far away from absurdism as you can get.

The show hits the spot in terms of humor sometimes (the dolphins from last season were awesome!) but it's just more cute/charming than hilarious. Of course, most stuff intended as comedy isn't particularly funny, so this isn't the biggest slight.

Unlike The Orville (even the toned-down humor of the 3rd season), I find myself not laughing out loud at LDS's humor. Mostly because I find most of it forced. I actually think there's a good animated show here, but it gets buried with the idea that "WE MUST BE FUNNY BY HAVING LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS CHARACTERS DOING LOUD AND OBNOXIOUS THINGS!!!"
 
The show hits the spot in terms of humor sometimes (the dolphins from last season were awesome!) but it's just more cute/charming than hilarious.

Definitely agree. More charming than hilarious, which I think is a good place to be for what is essentially a workplace sitcom that has to walk a fairly fine line of not being so zany it questions what we know about the ST universe.

A comedy in the Shakespearean sense, I'd say. It has a lighter tone that allows in things that are funny, like so much of life, but not spectacularly comedic. Certainly very clever, though --- as I said, they really walk the line well.

The condensed format, and the pacing that comes with it, means there's not a lot of time to waste. I think that's what makes it so effective. I recall talk about Star Wars, where people said the limitations of the original trilogy are actually what prompted some creativity and kept it from feeling bloated --- unlike some later entries (but that's neither here nor there --- just a comparison!).
 
Definitely agree. More charming than hilarious, which I think is a good place to be for what is essentially a workplace sitcom that has to walk a fairly fine line of not being so zany it questions what we know about the ST universe.

A comedy in the Shakespearean sense, I'd say. It has a lighter tone that allows in things that are funny, like so much of life, but not spectacularly comedic. Certainly very clever, though --- as I said, they really walk the line well.

The condensed format, and the pacing that comes with it, means there's not a lot of time to waste. I think that's what makes it so effective. I recall talk about Star Wars, where people said the limitations of the original trilogy are actually what prompted some creativity and kept it from feeling bloated --- unlike some later entries (but that's neither here nor there --- just a comparison!).

Yeah, I suppose I could say that even though it doesn't make me laugh very often, I'm never put into the situation where there's something which is supposed to be funny which I just find awkward and weird. I suppose the fast pacing means that any "unfunny jokes" just breeze by too fast to even consider.
 
Oh I completely agree and I'm conflicted about it, because part of the running gag, as you say, is that they're supposed to be in the dark. On occasion though they did manage to write these characters into bigger missions like Tendi being mistakenly taken along on a Romulan infiltration mission or the part that Rutherford played in the same episode with his glitching cyborg attachment. Then there's the times when they're lampooning around whilst we're seeing the otherside of the story play out with the bridge crew at the same time so we as viewers get a rounded view of what's going on.

I think they ended season 2 on a cliffhanger, making some pretty big statements, we've waited a year for this, the trailers implied a big rescue (yeah I know...trailers...) and then they handwave it all away with some really dense exposition in the last two minutes of the episode. I thought the episode was fun, it's not that I didn't enjoy what there was, I just don't think it serviced what they set up as well as it could have done.

This the issue I had with the episode as well. I get why it's happening, that it's a running joke, that it's expected that "lower decks" types wouldn't know what's going on amongst the command staff – but it really deflates the drama, especially given how emotionally involved Mariner was for most of the episode. And yes, I also know that the point of Lower Decks isn't satisfying drama, but still.

Still... it was okay. Not bad, not great. I'm loving the way they integrate 3D graphics into the art style though.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top