• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What would you change about 'Star Trek: Generations' if you could?

I have sometimes thought about a significant role for Nimoy in Generations. Not more dialogue in the prologue; anyone could have spoken the Spock lines, and Jimmy Doohan did. Instead, I've pondered a story that used Spock in the 24th-century, not the 23rd. Something that built off the Romulans early in the film -- which is a completely throwaway element -- which then causes Spock to become involved, either of his own volition or because Picard needs him. But then the film would start developing in very different directions, and some elements (Picard's grief, Data's emotion chip) would have to be diminished to make room for more Spock.
if you replace the Klingons, with the Romulans Spock would be brought in a diplomatic role YES!
 
Couldn't have been as bad as what we got.

GEN always struck me as overblown and glorified fanfic to get the two crews together.

Most crossovers feel at least a little contrived and generally also otherwise lacking.

if you replace the Klingons, with the Romulans Spock would be brought in a diplomatic role YES!

To me it's kind of interesting that Generations is, admits it is, epilogue to Kirk and the original series, having just Kirk makes sense with that, with TUC being a strong farewell but still wanting to do a crossover it makes sense to me to, if you do want to/have to do a crossover, bring back pretty much only one of the previous cast (rather than try to give new endings to Kirk and Spock or more).
 
What would I change? The lighting scheme on the Enterprise-D. They darkened and blackened so much out because they didn't have enough faith in the sets being able to hold up on the Big Screen.

I saw some TNG episodes in the theater in the early-2010s, when they remastered TNG and played two episodes from each season on the Big Screen. The Enterprise-D sets looked fine.
I really don't believe that was the case. The lighting scheme was designed specifically for the stunts and destruction we would see later on the bridge. I think the coordinators required more room or action space for men and women to leap off consoles as the sparks and fog machines do their thing.
 
Originally, the transition to the 24th century was supposed to begin with seeing the Romulan attack on the observatory. The POV for the battle was supposed to be from two low-level Starfleet crewmembers, and the Enterprise-D coming to the rescue at the last possible moment.

But Braga and Moore were concerned with doing something "different" and wanted the transition not to be something that was expected. According to the commentary track, someone suggested that the flash from Kirk disappearing from the Enterprise-B to the 24th century should be something odd, like Captain Picard pushing an egg across the floor of Ten Forward with his nose. Why would he be doing that? They didn't know, but it was a suggestion for them to build around.
Maybe cleaning his saddle again, in anticipation of shore leave when the Enterprise is diverted.
 
I think my biggest change would be to make Picard's and Kirk's fantasies a lot more appealing, tempting (including making the fantasy wife maybe Beverly or otherwise more compelling and developed, not make the family quite so Victorian-y), and not have echo-Guinan so involved in more explaining the Nexus and helping Picard including meeting Kirk, have Picard learn more about but reject the fantasy and get to know about and meet Kirk on his own.
This is my big problem with the movie too, but I kind of have a polar opposite approach for how it should be looked at
Here's the main problem with the film. It is blatantly obvious that Kirk's fantasy is to command a ship again. Not to be retired. Which was what he was doing before. So why is Kirk's Nexus fantasy having him be retired? And while Picard's fantasy of having a family is debatable, why was he able to escape its allure so easily, despite everything that Guinan said? Or Kirk too, for that matter?
The whole Nexus thing is utterly misrepresented from what they were depicting imho. They claim it's some ultimate fantasy fulfillment, from which no one would ever want to leave, when clearly all it did was take its occupants' current thoughts and extrapolate from them.

They kill off Picard's family earlier, just so they can make him preoccupied with his family's future, & create a reason for that fantasy. It's not his ultimate fulfillment, which we already know to be captaining a starship. It's what was on his mind at the time. The same is true of Kirk. When he went in, he was feeling put out to pasture, a relic. So, he is literally jumping a horse in a pasture, & realizing it doesn't fulfill him anymore. He was most preoccupied with going & being home, so he could tell his woman he was unsatisfied, & needed to go back to Starfleet where he IS fulfilled, & somehow, he's been stuck in a loop of getting that moment... for ages now.

The Nexus isn't an Eden of fantasy fulfillment. It's a mind-reading "Groundhog Day" hellscape, that is probably some telepathic entity's way of keeping its occupants in some form of frozen perpetual contentment, based solely on a cursory scanning of their initial thoughts, likely so it can derive some kind of benefit from that contentment it has rendered in them.

Now consider both Guinan & Soren, who'd been recently ripped from the Nexus, after only a short time of getting caught in it, on an evac from their world, which had been decimated by Borg. Those 2 had lost everything & everyone, like very recently, & the Nexus read them pining for it, in their current thoughts, & gave it to them. OF COURSE they didn't want to leave.

So there's really nothing wrong with the depiction of the Nexus. It's a perfectly sound Star Trek concept. They just misrepresented it entirely. Its nature needed to be made much clearer to the viewer imho. That & it needed to clean up the timey wimey stuff too
 
How long had the El-Aurians been traveling? They were being carried in Federation ships of some kind, and yet it would be nearly 80 years before the Federation encountered the Borg. Did they travel for 100 years before the Federation gave them aid? 1000 years? Had the destruction just occurred not long before the movie and this was the early contact with that species?
 
Well, Guinan herself had been ON Earth in the 19th century. So some level of covert interaction had been going on for a long time. I'd imagine they're near enough to not require numerous years to reach Earth. She's also claimed to not have been on her world when the Borg devastated it, nor would I imagine any of the 415 El-Aurian refugees were either, which is how they're survived. It does seem as though they were on route away from the Borg attack crisis. I always assumed this is how Soren lost his family, & Guinan probably had similar befall her.

The ships were actually El-Aurian ships. So, it's possible they were journeying for any length of time, before getting caught up in the Nexus, & while their ships began to break apart, they benefitted from its effects, a lot of whom probably still missing the lost loved ones, & experiencing fantasies of them
 
How long had the El-Aurians been traveling? They were being carried in Federation ships of some kind, and yet it would be nearly 80 years before the Federation encountered the Borg. Did they travel for 100 years before the Federation gave them aid? 1000 years? Had the destruction just occurred not long before the movie and this was the early contact with that species?
I think you've officially thought about this more than the screenwriters.
 
Have the Talosians send a telepathic message to Admiral Kirk showing him Captain Pike and Vina enjoying a sunny picnic in a desert oasis. Adding their observation that, "All treks start from the same place. And each begins with a single thought. Each thought filtered by perception. Space is larger than the mind. But the mind can connect you with all points in space...and beyond. Like Captain Pike, Admiral Kirk, your trek has no ending. Your story endures. Even when it is time for you to rest..."
 
Don't kill Kirk. Don't destroy the Enterprise-D.

Change is never a good thing.

It can be a good thing, it just depends.

As for the movie, after rewatching VI, VII felt like a step down and a mishmash... and to think the movie series never recovered until the 21st century...
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top