I love that aspect. Why not?
They got Pike and Number One right, but almost everyone else has one stripe too many?
Where the hell was Bob Fletcher!?!?![]()
Early on, I heard Number One addressed as "commander," in which two full stripes would have been correct. Afterward, I heard her addressed as "lieutenant commander" (ala Spock a couple of times during TOS), which nicely blew that idea out of the water. They really couldn't help but get Pike's right since those were the same stripes Kirk wore during TOS, and Cadet Uhura having no stripes should have been easy, IMO.They got Pike and Uhura right and M'Benga could go either way.
There may actually have been. if the costume department wasn't all that familiar with how the rank stripes were done in TOS, that would explain things. SNW may have a ton of producers, but if the costumes weren't given much more than a "yeah, that looks close enough to TOS," then only fans would have noticed anything amiss.I guess the SNW costume designer is similarily clueless about ranks. Either that or there was some massive communications breakdown between the writers and the costume department.
Everybody basically ranks up at "Their pace". Yes, there is a minimum time needed in ___ rank before you can level up to the next rank
Which is probably all the time they were given to get the job done. Close enough and move on, rather than figuring out all the little details. Which, unfortunately, fans will.SNW may have a ton of producers, but if the costumes weren't given much more than a "yeah, that looks close enough to TOS," then only fans would have noticed anything amiss.
Early on, I heard Number One addressed as "commander," in which two full stripes would have been correct. Afterward, I heard her addressed as "lieutenant commander" (ala Spock a couple of times during TOS), which nicely blew that idea out of the water. They really couldn't help but get Pike's right since those were the same stripes Kirk wore during TOS, and Cadet Uhura having no stripes should have been easy, IMO.
Don't blame the fans, blame the producers for being lazy if it's indeed a screw-up.Which is probably all the time they were given to get the job done. Close enough and move on, rather than figuring out all the little details. Which, unfortunately, fans will.
Preaching to the choir there, but if you want to get technical, the origins of lieutenant commander stemmed from the practice of actually putting lieutenants in command of small craft. They were known originally as "lieutenant in command," "lieutenant commanding," or "senior lieutenant" depending in what 19th-Century navy you were in. The USN began addressing lieutenant commanders as commanders as a kind of shorthand, but also in keeping with their practice of commonly addressing lieutenant junior grades as simply lieutenants."Commander" is appropriate address for a lieutenant commander. The rank is a kind of commander, not a lieutenant.
I don't blame anyone.Don't blame the fans, blame the producers for being lazy if it's indeed a screw-up.
Hmm...I don't think any kind of entertainment is worth having high blood pressure over, but I tend to view Star Trek fans as not being any worse than sports fans--seriously, I do. The difference is largely in public perception, IMO. But whereas Star Trek fans may argue over lore, sports fans will get just as passionate and long-winded about player and team stats. Trekkies criticize producers & writers, sports fans criticize coaches & managers. It's really not that different. In both camps, the people who take the time to discuss what they like and don't like on message boards likely represent a small minority of their fanbases, but you'll find them if you go looking for them.I don't blame anyone.
I just know what to expect from fans.
I know how I would do it if it were my production but I'm super anal-retentive about uniforms, insignia, and such, and Hollywood isn't. So, that' my problem, and one that I have become more relaxed about over the years. Life's too short for high blood pressure.
...I tend to view Star Trek fans as not being any worse than sports fans
Colonels and Lt Colonels are a similar practice - both addressed as Colonel.…the origins of lieutenant commander stemmed from the practice of actually putting lieutenants in command of small craft. They were known originally as "lieutenant in command," "lieutenant commanding," or "senior lieutenant" depending in what 19th-Century navy you were in. The USN began addressing lieutenant commanders as commanders as a kind of shorthand, but also in keeping with their practice of commonly addressing lieutenant junior grades as simply lieutenants.
I regard sports fans as worse. Not by much, though. I have been both and am rather done with the sports side.Hmm...I don't think any kind of entertainment is worth having high blood pressure over, but I tend to view Star Trek fans as not being any worse than sports fans--seriously, I do. The difference is largely in public perception, IMO. But whereas Star Trek fans may argue over lore, sports fans will get just as passionate and long-winded about player and team stats. Trekkies criticize producers & writers, sports fans criticize coaches & managers. It's really not that different. In both camps, the people who take the time to discuss what they like and don't like on message boards likely represent a small minority of their fanbases, but you'll find them if you go looking for them.
Even though such accusations can be deserved. Many times it's not, but sometimes it is. Well, it's only a problem if you let it be a problem. Hanging around a Star Trek message board isn't exactly the best way to avoid hearing criticism about Trek. I think the majority of people who enjoy Star Trek and still have lots of fun with it, they don't hang around here. They're too busy actually watching Star Trek...Accusations of laziness, ineptitude and gross incompetence directed at production teams do not strike me as very, shall we say, uplifting.
Calling people lazy strikes me as jumping over a line, but that's just me.Even though such accusations can be deserved. Many times it's not, but sometimes it is. Well, it's only a problem if you let it be a problem. Hanging around a Star Trek message board isn't exactly the best way to avoid hearing criticism about Trek. I think the majority of people who enjoy Star Trek and still have lots of fun with it, they don't hang around here. They're too busy actually watching Star Trek...
That's probably the best option you should take in such discussions.Calling people lazy strikes me as jumping over a line, but that's just me.
I don't mind criticism. It just strays sometimes in to personal attacks that I find troublesome. Saying "They're lazy" is a quick way for me to check out.
It's almost as if the rank stripes refer to positions than actual grades.
One stripe, one thin stripe, one stripe = captain
Two stripes = senior officers & senior medical personnel
One stripe, one thin stripe = department head
One stripe = junior officer
No stripe = cadets & cannon fodder
Wait till you see the toilet paper. It's quilted
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.