To take it a step further, you'd think people would be even more open-minded in the 23rd Century than Today, not less.Human Sexuality isn't as cut and dried as many folks would like to believe.![]()
Last edited:
To take it a step further, you'd think people would be even more open-minded in the 23rd Century than Today, not less.Human Sexuality isn't as cut and dried as many folks would like to believe.![]()
I miss having access to the full scholarly database in grad school. This would be an interesting topic...if slightly annoying.In the early days I thought it did a terrible disservice to men by asserting they are somehow incapable. Even though it's very common in my son's circle of close friends to tell a friend you love them. I don't know. There are many scholarly works on the subject of shipping in fan culture.
Replacement theory panic? Fear of losing relevance? You know. The usual.Yeah, I don’t get why „not the only kid on the block anymore“ equals „just the other thing from now on“ for some
I noticed that as well.Worse, Ethan Peck's delivery begins to match hers when they are playing off each other.
By the same logic almost no fictional character is definitely straight. That's a bit ridiculous. (EDIT: doesn't mean one should assume, mind you)The point is, the assumption he is straight is an assumption. It is not canon because Kirk hasn't said he's never had any same-sex attraction. There isn't a quota for labels or identities, and perhaps unfortunately, you cannot gatekeep what people think about a person who does not actually exist.
I heard 4%, myself. And well under 1% for trans.I've heard the 10% figure since the 90s.
But isn't the whole point of acting to play someone you're not? It kind of defeats the purpose to specifically seek -- for instance -- left-handed actors to play left-handed characters, or to avoid dying your hair and instead cast someone of the appropriate hair colour instead.Listen to yourself. No. That's erasure.
They should look at actors that the character represents first (within human reason, obviously there's no alien actors), then look for alternatives.
Nonsense: we're building an ark right this moment!!Again, relax, heterosexuals aren't going anywhere
Huh, that works on a couple of levels!!That would violate canon
Spock thought so - his response: "Logical...Flawlessly logical."And she was correct, wasn't she?
It's fascinating! Textual Poachers by Henry Jenkins. It's really good and references stuff Joanna Russ wrote on the subject of slash fic back in the 70'sI miss having access to the full scholarly database in grad school. This would be an interesting topic...if slightly annoying.
I blame Hollywood. Things like When Harry Met Sally trying to tell us every straight friendship was actually attraction primed everyone to look for romance in friendship. The difference is, some people could not see romance in same-sex friendships without it hitting them on the head (like Nurse Chapel).It's like some people can't fathom the concept of a deep friendship without sexual elements attached to it.
I thought it was great.
Apropos of nothing, me and my wife had been in an twelve hour argument about really nothing at all. Watching T'Pring and Spock in this episode inspired me to apologise for not seeing something from her perspective and in an instant everything was fine.
Really lovely episode. Just sad not to see Hemmer. Jess Bush has me completely won over as Chapel. I was really on the fence, but she's brilliant I think.
I'd like to know what kind of person lies under the over-wisecracking exterior of Ortegas. I'd really like her to have some focus soon.
I blame Hollywood. Things like When Harry Met Sally trying to tell us every straight friendship was actually attraction primed everyone to look for romance in friendship. The difference is, some people could not see romance in same-sex friendships without it hitting them on the head (like Nurse Chapel).
I for one really love a non-romantic relationship. I actually dislike Kirk/Spock very much. I know sex isn't entirely transactional, but it for me adds something... not negative, but a different feel, I guess? A good, strong friendship is what I feel between those two. This has nothing to do with their sexualities, though. Even if both men were 100% gay I don't think I'd like them together.
Yeah. I'm a straight woman who has been intimate with women. Yet, I don't consider myself to be bisexual. AND THAT'S OKAY (because...spectrum lol) and jesus we should probably say something about Spock now.Ugh. It's not just admiration. At risk of crossing the line into vulgarity, I am turned on by many women.
100%.I actually think television, in general, does "deep friendships" much better than "romantic relationships."
Or maybe it's just that I prefer watching the friendships develop and all that comes with that. I guess it's one of the reasons I think most shows "jump the shark" when two main characters finally get together or whatever.
Did you consider switching Katra?I thought it was great.
Apropos of nothing, me and my wife had been in an twelve hour argument about really nothing at all. Watching T'Pring and Spock in this episode inspired me to apologise for not seeing something from her perspective and in an instant everything was fine.
It mirrors some social views. A former boss of mine was of the opinion that friendship between (straight) men and women was impossible. A strange outlook, I thought.I blame Hollywood. Things like When Harry Met Sally trying to tell us every straight friendship was actually attraction primed everyone to look for romance in friendship.
Idem for Frodo/Sam.I for one really love a non-romantic relationship. I actually dislike Kirk/Spock very much. I know sex isn't entirely transactional, but it for me adds something... not negative, but a different feel, I guess? A good, strong friendship is what I feel between those two. This has nothing to do with their sexualities, though. Even if both men were 100% gay I don't think I'd like them together.
100%.I actually think television, in general, does "deep friendships" much better than "romantic relationships."
Or maybe it's just that I prefer watching the friendships develop and all that comes with that. I guess it's one of the reasons I think most shows "jump the shark" when two main characters finally get together or whatever.
I'm so glad you said that. I really dislike Spock/Kirk A LOT for the same reason. And have argued with shippers that it's not about gay because if they were both gay characters in canon I would still dislike it. Because people can be friends, can love each other without being sexually attracted. And the power of their friendship and how it grew and weathered storms and betrayals and became so important to both of them was a powerful story.I blame Hollywood. Things like When Harry Met Sally trying to tell us every straight friendship was actually attraction primed everyone to look for romance in friendship. The difference is, some people could not see romance in same-sex friendships without it hitting them on the head (like Nurse Chapel).
I for one really love a non-romantic relationship. I actually dislike Kirk/Spock very much. I know sex isn't entirely transactional, but it for me adds something... not negative, but a different feel, I guess? A good, strong friendship is what I feel between those two. This has nothing to do with their sexualities, though. Even if both men were 100% gay I don't think I'd like them together.
I smiled every time I heard it. More hijinks please.I didn't really enjoy this episode all that much. They used the word "hijinks" way too much. I wanted more scenes of M'Benga fishing.
Welcome back to episodic TV. They bonded between episodes.The one bit that I was a little confused on initially was: when did Chaple and Ortegas become such good friends?
Or a… gasp… actual non binary person. But then I am not sure the show runners were aware back then of non binary people’s existence.
"Oooh the pain"
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.