Yep. We were led to believe that when Tarka died Book's transporter signal was interrupted and he perished. Which was a really smart dramatic move on the writers' part.
I will say that DSC is the one Trek series that has shown it needs to tighten up its season-long story arcs and if we can keep the season to 10 episodes that will be a big help in keeping the story pace going and excitement in the audience. If you're going to play a long game then the fewer filler episodes that don't really pay off the better.
This season could have done in 10 what took 13.
Less Book and Burnham, more Saru, T'Rina, Adira, Gray, President ofThis might surprise you, but I agree with most of your points!
Smaller cast, yes! I like them but so many are just filler.
Less Book. I've lost all respect for him this season.
Shorter season, given the writing shortcomings, yes.
I don't necessarily need more Vance, but I do like his character.
Yeah, Few characters truly significant have died on Discovery, hell, in Star Trek generally - without coming back somehow, even Dax for obvious reasons. Makes sense if everybody's a kind of superhero.I know that. But it looked like he did.
Warp can't get any faster than we saw in the 24th century. Any faster and everyone turns into SalamandersWhich is silly. They are really making the 32nd century look bad.
The Relativity could travel anywhere in space and time in a instant. I doubt that needed Dilithium
There's a HUGE gap in speed between Infinity and how fast you can go at Warp.Warp can't get any faster than we saw in the 24th century. Any faster and everyone turns into Salamanders
A key reason this is being received as the best season so far {...}
So true! And not easy to pull off.Also: Book dies, then returns and both scenes have emotional impact and rewards.
Not to mention Picard in "Et In Arcadia Ego, Part 2." That is like the textbook example of how to do everything wrong at both ends of a character death and character resurrection.If you're going to kill off an important character and then bring him back about five or ten minutes later this is the way to do it. TROS tried that with Chewbacca and utterly botched what could have been an emotionally-gripping moment and release of emotions when it was revealed he was still alive.
I'm sorry, but is it not, not by a long shot! I've never read so much complaints by fans from this show on this board
Discovery was never that great story-wise, but in previous seasons you were at least kept on the edge of your seat and had episode endings which made you go 'WOW! Did not expect that!'.
Now the show transformed into the U.S.S. Discovery set on a space psychiatric ward where all they do is talk about feelings and no matter what you do, you will always be redeemed, cos in the end; All's Well That Ends Well.
To my eyes this thread is heavily comprised of "they finally stuck the landing!" posts, and recent weeks have been similarly filled with a rising excitement as we collectively started to feel that they might finally stick the landing, but whatev. I obviously would be foolish to deny there will always be a passionate anti- contingent as well.
Yes, but usually the reason you didn't expect those episode endings is because they were incoherent and badly written, and the reason you were kept on the edge of your seat is because they didn't know how to unfold their stories and would instead vamp with empty SUSPENSE stall tactics until it was time for a slapdash letdown of a finale.
I would quibble with your phrasing, but I think your essential point here is correct -- primary concerns of the show are getting in touch with your feelings and redemption.
If you're not open to this approach, that's totally understandable, but then you don't actually like Discovery. It's what they're doing. It's what the show is. It's the very core of the show's identity and what everything else is built on.
To say you love Discovery but want it to stop being a show about redemption and processing your feelings is like saying you love Voyager, you just want it to stop being a show about a crew lost in the Delta Quadrant. Or you love Deep Space Nine, you just want it to stop being a show on a space station. It's perfectly reasonable to not like any of those things, I'm just always a bit mystified by "I love this show, except that I hate it's basic premise, core identity, main story topics, character arcs, and primary themes!"
What I've seen this season is that people who liked Discovery in the past, didn't like the direction it took this season. They never hammered the feelings part so hard on the nose like they've done in season 4. And I'm all for showing feelings and emotions, but this season it happened a lot during moments where it just didn't make any sense.
The earlier season had more of a Lost-approach, which I really liked. You came back for more, cos you wanted to know how they could explain that ending (granted, the explanations weren't always satisfying). Now it's just dragging in places. And having interesting plotlines in one episode (like how to communicate with the Ten C, or Kovich's alternate plans with Bryce or Tarka's friend) which are not followed up or are forgotten.
A show about feelings and redemption is fine, but the writing does have to make sense. When there's a ticking clock and a DMA is about to destroy Earth, you're not goint to your quarters to start talking about feelings. When you're in a battle, you don't go to your Ready Room and start to talk about feelings with the Federation President. That's just weird and bad writing.
You can't have a show that wants to be all talky, feely and at the same time have a ticking time bomb about destroying the universe... That just doesn't work, or at least, it doesn't work for me.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.