• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

The problem is, in my opinion, more that Star Trek doesn't really have a word that can be used to encompass all sapient lifeforms. Even calling humanoids "humanoids" is problematic in this context, since it assumes human as the basis/standard

my personal head canon on this is that the Universal Translator is being equally provincial with every species, so that “humanoid” translates to “Klingon shaped” or “Ferengi-esque” to the ears of those species.
 
TOS Season 3 may be the weakest, but episode for episode I still enjoy it more than any other Season from any other Star Trek show. Burman Trek, Streaming Trek… I love em both but I’d still rather watch Season 3 of TOS.

Yup.

Only as a grownup did I really notice the diff in quality. As a kid I disliked the ones with Rand, not because of her, but they seemed solwer, duller. Now I like that thoughtfulness at times, and the wider role of the ancillary crew. My mileage has varied, but TOS os quantum above every thing else for me.
 
Well, to be fair, 10-year-old Lord Garth wouldn't have been that interested in going to see License to Kill. So the next opening took six years. ;)
Goldeneye was my first Bond film in a theater, and I was in my thirties. Sometimes it just works out that way.
my personal head canon on this is that the Universal Translator is being equally provincial with every species, so that “humanoid” translates to “Klingon shaped” or “Ferengi-esque” to the ears of those species.
I've been saying for years that Klingon, Ferengi, Vulcan, etc., all translate into English as "Human". Those are their words for themselves, and there is no other reasonable translation.
 
I've been saying for years that Klingon, Ferengi, Vulcan, etc., all translate into English as "Human". Those are their words for themselves, and there is no other reasonable translation.
so why are humans upset when called terrans after all terran translates into human in terran english?
 
That's why I didn't mention Cardassian. Or Romulan (an Earth referent anyway). Or Andorian, or Tellarite. Their native languages have words that translate into English as "Human", but the Federation doesn't use them.
 
That's why I didn't mention Cardassian. Or Romulan (an Earth referent anyway). Or Andorian, or Tellarite. Their native languages have words that translate into English as "Human", but the Federation doesn't use them.
do they use them? on screen, that is.
 
Last edited:
James White in his Sector General series, had this to say:
There was a second’s pause, then: “Give your physiological classification please,” said the red-furred receptionist with a wink toward the two watchers. “All intelligent races refer to their own species as human and think of all others as being nonhuman, so that what you call yourself has no meaning …”​
 
Star Trek: Voyager serves as a stark reminder about our future if we don't change.

Right now, we are polluting our planet and even some orbits in near space. In VOY's 24th century, it has apparently gotten to the point that even in the middle of the DQ, they trip over some old Earth, Klingon, or other AQ junk every other week.
 
Star Trek: Voyager serves as a stark reminder about our future if we don't change.

Right now, we are polluting our planet and even some orbits in near space. In VOY's 24th century, it has apparently gotten to the point that even in the middle of the DQ, they trip over some old Earth, Klingon, or other AQ junk every other week.

Damn that had me in stitches..... :guffaw::guffaw::guffaw:
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top