Entertaining? No. Understanding? Yes.
Yes, that's what "entertain" means in that context.
Oxford Collocations Dictionary
entertain verb
[transitive] (not used in the progressive tenses) entertain something (formal) to consider or allow yourself to think about an idea, a hope, a feeling, etc.
He had entertained hopes of a reconciliation.
to entertain a doubt/suspicion
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/entertain
Careful you don't leave yourself so open-minded that logic and reason wander out the door, and Holocaust Deniers and QAnon insurrections and the like take up residence, because if you're willing to lend credence to this deep state anti-vaxxer bullshit, you're already in the same neighborhood. And once the people they support gain unconditional power
like in an attempted coup, they don't care about allowing the open-mindedness or very identity of others they don't like to be legally protected, so you could be shooting yourself in the foot.
So, just out of curiosity, since
Donald Trump was the head of government when the COVID-19 vaccines were first commissioned, how is he not a part of "Operation Control the Population by Giving them Cancer Through Covid Vaccines"? The alleged deep state can only do so much outside his and Congress' purview. If he's in on it then why are the same people putting forth these conspiracies supporting his return to power?
Where is the rise in cancer cases that should roughly parallel the increase in the number of people receiving the mRNA vaccine? There should be an incredible spike in new cancer cases over the yearly average since the vaccines have been delivered en masse to the public, but none has materialized.
How exactly would this program be advantageous to the government anyway? You'd be killing off or temporarily/permanently disabling a huge portion of your voting base, workforce, and consumer base, thus devastating the economy and causing you to have less political support (which again, only works for people supporting a coup where they could get unconditional and unilateral power). You'd be committing the federal and state governments to trillions of dollars in expenditures for cancer treatments through Medicare and Medicaid. You'd be placing the mostly elderly (on both sides) and mostly vaccinated Congress in greater danger since they'd have less chance of survival from cancer than younger people would. Are they looking to kill themselves or the politicians they support off?
Where's the evidence from reputable sources? I can produce documentation from specialists in cancer research and vaccines that this is nonsense. Where's the proof from them?
Myth: The mRNA vaccines change your DNA and could cause cancer.
Truth: None of the vaccines interact with or alter your DNA in any way, and therefore cannot cause cancer.
Messenger RNA (mRNA) is not the same as DNA and cannot be combined with DNA to change your genetic code. Here’s now mRNA vaccines actually work:
The mRNA vaccines use a tiny piece of the coronavirus’ genetic code to teach your immune system how to make a protein that will trigger an immune response if you get infected. The mRNA is fragile, so after it delivers the instructions to your cells, it breaks down and disappears from the body (in about 72 hours). The mRNA never even goes into the nucleus of the cell — the part that contains your DNA.
Therefore, there is no truth to the myth that somehow the mRNA vaccine could inactivate the genes that suppress tumors.
https://www.mskcc.org/coronavirus/myths-about-covid-19-vaccines
Open-mindedness as a philosophy is a good one, but it must always be tempered by responsible skepticism and a good BS filter. And I'd argue that actual good faith open-mindedness is the furthest thing from what these politically motivated anti-vaxxers actually want. For them, their calls for "open-mindedness" are merely a means to an end to get their foot in the door, after which they slam it shut on anyone who doesn't conform to their particular (and often bigoted) standards.
If anyone has a genuine reason to be skeptical of the government offering vaccines, it's black people, on account of the Tuskegee Experiments and other abuses of power, but they're not the ones offering the biggest opposition to the Covid vaccines. It's mostly cisgendered, heterosexual, white people who have never had to face institutional bigotry from law enforcement, schools, businesses, government, or medical care in their lives who are the main driving force behind this anti-vaxxer movement, so I have little sympathy for them. Their opposition is rooted in nothing deeper then "stickin' it to the Libs", mindless cultism, and selfishness.