Nerdrotic again. Most eras had three series/seasons (not chronological years, though for most incarnations, the two neatly lined up.) He's spinning more than a hard drive (prior to the introduction of SSDs). Yes, story quality is debatable - it's a separate issue. So are ratings, though from that sole standpoint one could argue a possible issue.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-series-8-ratings-accumulator-66394.htm
vs
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/doctor-who-series-11-2018-uk-ratings-accumulator-88397.htm
etc
Chibnall brought in some good stuff. Not-as-good stuff. Just like everyone else and not everyone is going to like or dislike the same things in the show.
Too many on that list are too expensive. See Capaldi's comments on being on The Suicide Squad compared to Who.
Apparently. The Beeb needs to throw a LOT of money at this show, it generates a lot for them, as well as a profile. We seem to be returning to the situation between BBC/Who when it was shut down before.
I wonder what it would take to lure RTD back?
Chibnall was woeful. Jodie didn't get a fair go. Same with Smith/Capaldi and Moff at the end of his run IMO. Flashes of brilliance shining through the hubris.
What can RTD refresh and make feel original and new again? RTD's era was burnt out long before he left. Even at his highlight, when Rose left, people were screaming to have her back and couldn't handle Martha or her family. Which is sad because I preferred Martha and got tired of the Rose addicts, along with many. (Even in series 2, enough people wanted Rose gone and Mickey to stay because he was more interesting AS a character and Rose was trash toward him as well...) RTD bringing her back in series 4, even bypassing his large expositiondump as to how permanent and mawkish her departure was (complete with loud muzak designed to get people to cry --- wait, people go after Chibnall for using too much exposition?! Come on, the show always does that and RTD's wasn't any better...), only showed how burnt out he was as well as everyone feeling underwhelmed over Rose's return for the most part.
\His era's fans couldn't handle anyone other than Tennant either, no matter how hard Smith, Capaldi, and Whitaker had to try to keep enough similar mannerisms and "ha-ha-funny" going. That did more to make the show even more stale. A lot of viewers seem to want more of the same. We've all seen the show change, at times we like it more and at other times less. Not always for the same reasons (the flip side of the same coin about wanting the format to be identical, actually.)
The show needs to feel fresh again. Even more importantly, the show needs to take itself and its characters seriously again. That's where it begins. Returning to an era loaded with superficial and 4th wall/meta/
flanderization, eventually goes nowhere as they feel hollow out retreads - unless something big and refreshing is added, which is why Chibnall's redo of "Gallifrey destroyed, oh noes!" ends up being
better than a generic "time war" with some Daleks, who became comic relief soon enough as well... (which is a shame because RTD brought them back incredibly well before they went to pot in series 2. Chibnall never got the Daleks right... but he did the Master a hell of a lot more justice than the cartoon villain that Moffat and Chibnall had to rescue... )