• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Tuvix Episode Revisited

Pretty sure that the TOS crew committed murder when they merged "evil" Kirk back into "good" Kirk.

Are you saying they killed evil Kirk, good Kirk or both?

But in the TOS timeline how long had the "treaty" been in existence? And were the years referred in terms of unusual short Klingon years?

I thought Klingon years were longer...
 
Last edited:
The thing is that Voyager and Star Trek In general are fictions, we don't need to agree with their conclusions to be entertained by them. We must not lose sight of that. Some of the things that we are shown are entertaining yet if applied to real-life truly horrible and detestable. We don't need to agree on what they are but we can always debate it.

True, and there are Star Trek decisions that in my view are a good deal more detestable than this one. Picard willing to let the last survivors die on a planet surface because the Prime Directive dictates it, and somehow, cultural contamination is apparently worse than extinction of a sapient species would be one of them in my book. In this case, at least, you could argue that Janeway was faced with a difficult conundrum with no clear-cut solution. No matter what decision you take, someone would always die/ have died in retrospect.

IMO, given the impossible facts as presented, I mean mixing two (three actually) DNAs already strain credibility beyond reason but unscramble these DNAs and reconstitute the people goes beyond even that!!! To quote Asimov is it worse than impossible, it's ridiculous.

To quote the same Janeway: We're Starfleet. Weird is part of the job.

Anyway, Janeway wasn't given a deadline about the "unscrambling" procedure she could have done it immediately or waited till they came back to the alpha quadrant or anytime in between so her murdering of Tuvix was not only unwarranted but a bit precipitous as if she was afraid that if she waited any longer people would start to argue that there was some merit in letting Tuvix live. That's cowardly.

Fully agree with this one. She appears to have been be mighty hasty. Perhaps because the feared that the longer she waited the more bonds Tuvix would form with the new crew and the harder it would be to actually execute her decision. In fact, she admits so herself:

JANEWAY: It's funny. If we'd had the ability to separate Tuvok and Neelix the moment Tuvix came aboard, I wouldn't have hesitated.
CHAKOTAY: Of course not.
JANEWAY: But now, in the past few weeks, he's begun to make a life for himself on this ship. He's taken on responsibilities, made friends.
CHAKOTAY: I count myself as one of them.
JANEWAY: So at what point, did he become an individual and not a transporter accident? (doorbell) Come in.
 
hRn5INfh.jpg
 
My opinion is kind of "in the middle".

Were Janeway's actions morally wrong?
Yes, I think so. Tuvix was a living being that Janeway made a decision to destroy. It's indicative of her cult leader power over the crew that no one opposed her, except the Doctor (who being a hologram was bound to his Hippocratic program).

Did Janeway commit murder?
No. Like it or not, Federation law did not extend to certain unprecedented situations. Since the Federation had not yet ruled on the morality or legality of separating a being like Tuvix, Janeway could not be charged with a crime.
Would she be obligated to explain her actions when they returned to the Alpha quadrant? or is it like Vegas, whatever happens in Delta quadrant stays in Delta quadrant? And also, doesn't her junior officers have an obligation to report her actions once they get back home?
 
Would she be obligated to explain her actions when they returned to the Alpha quadrant? or is it like Vegas, whatever happens in Delta quadrant stays in Delta quadrant? And also, doesn't her junior officers have an obligation to report her actions once they get back home?

My point... it doesn't matter. If court martialed, Janeway would likely be exonerated, because the Federation does not have laws for anything like Tuvix's case. Her actions might be deplorable, but that doesn't mean they're punishable.
 
My point... it doesn't matter. If court martialed, Janeway would likely be exonerated, because the Federation does not have laws for anything like Tuvix's case. Her actions might be deplorable, but that doesn't mean they're punishable.

I think the Federation has laws against murder. Her actions would be punishable in a coherent world but Star Trek is rarely coherent, much less when it comes to Voyager which is schizophrenic to a fault. What's true today may be wrong tomorrow and vice versa.
 
I'm in the middle on this one, always have been, which I believe makes it a great episode. I don't always need finality in my stories, I'm cool with a bit of ambiguity (Hi there Sopranos finale!) or grey areas morality-wise. Is it not conceivable that Tuvix was a new life form? In which case Janeway is arguably breaking General Order 1 (even though in many episodes that's more a suggestion than a rule, lol).

I can't do a Tuvix post without adding I thought Tom Wright was brilliant in those final moments.
 
My point... it doesn't matter. If court martialed, Janeway would likely be exonerated, because the Federation does not have laws for anything like Tuvix's case. Her actions might be deplorable, but that doesn't mean they're punishable.
Thomas Riker claimed his doppelgangers commission in Starfleet.

Transporter clones are real people with rights.

Will Riker is just as fake as Tom, and he kept his commission.

B'Elanna is also a Transporter Clone.

She kept her provisional rank badge.

Not even Klingon any more.

She's a surgically altered human.

So all that crap about her baby being too klingon is ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Tuvix's situation was unprecedented. Generally, when a transporter mistake occurs, it is (1) fatal, (2) does great harm to one or more people. Either way, correcting it if possible is pretty much expected. Here, we had a transporter error that was not only sentient, but didn't want to be corrected. If Tuvix had been the subject of "The Measure of a Man", I could see him being granted the protection of the law... but he didn't have it yet.

Consider this: if Picard had not fought Maddox in "Measure of a Man", and Data had died on Maddox's table, Maddox would not have been subject to murder, because (at the time) disassembling Data was not murder. Even if Soong type androids were later found to be sentient. This is because Maddox (and Janeway) were operating within the parameters of the law at the time. Many other evil and disgusting actions (slavery, stealing land from Native Americans, treating women as chattel) were as well.
 
Tuvix's situation was unprecedented. Generally, when a transporter mistake occurs, it is (1) fatal, (2) does great harm to one or more people. Either way, correcting it if possible is pretty much expected. Here, we had a transporter error that was not only sentient, but didn't want to be corrected. If Tuvix had been the subject of "The Measure of a Man", I could see him being granted the protection of the law... but he didn't have it yet.

Consider this: if Picard had not fought Maddox in "Measure of a Man", and Data had died on Maddox's table, Maddox would not have been subject to murder, because (at the time) disassembling Data was not murder. Even if Soong type androids were later found to be sentient. This is because Maddox (and Janeway) were operating within the parameters of the law at the time. Many other evil and disgusting actions (slavery, stealing land from Native Americans, treating women as chattel) were as well.

According to Federation law (I hope) killing a sentient being is murder regardless of the origin of that sentient being. Janeway is a murderer who got away with it because of plot stupidity. Just because the writers are lacking intelligence doesn't me that we should. Suspension of disbelief doesn't mean suspension of intellect.
She didn't have the right to make that decision, no one person does.

They killed Tuvix and later told the story to Naomi as if it was a joke.

Tuvix was very clever, more so than Tuvok, but he never realized what a bunch assholes were calling themselves his friends. He only saw it when he was about to die.
 
My opinion is kind of "in the middle".

Were Janeway's actions morally wrong?
Yes, I think so. Tuvix was a living being that Janeway made a decision to destroy. It's indicative of her cult leader power over the crew that no one opposed her, except the Doctor (who being a hologram was bound to his Hippocratic program).

Did Janeway commit murder?
No. Like it or not, Federation law did not extend to certain unprecedented situations. Since the Federation had not yet ruled on the morality or legality of separating a being like Tuvix, Janeway could not be charged with a crime.

Sorry got to disagree, Tuvix can't be held responsible for how he came to be i.e. the Transporter accident. He was a new sentient lifeform and as such was entitled to all the rights the UFP bestows upon sentient beings, which includes not being killed against his will i.e. murdered.

I'm sticking with my original position. Faced with either killing two people (Tuvok and Neelix), or one (Tuvix), surely it would be better to choose the option that causes less harm?

To say otherwise would be to claim that Tuvok and Neelix had no right to their own individual lives. Why should Tuvix's life trump theirs?



The greatest good for the greatest number should be observed. And that would be allowing Tuvok and Neelix to return to their own existences.

Surely Tuvix would technically be a civilian and Starfleet officers are supposed to protect civilians even at the cost of their own life. One could possibly make a case that separating Tuvix would case more harm as you can you harm people who aren't there in body to harm?

But from a legal point of view Janeway didn't have any business make a decision like that in which she was emotionally invested.

It's an impossible choice. Whatever Janeways chooses, a life will end. So does she choose the sentient being who is alive standing before her, or the lives of her two friends she has already "lost"?

If it were me, I doubt I would have the capability of killing someone who was begging to not be murdered, regardless of the stakes behind it. I'm not saying Janeway was wrong, or even immoral, but I do not think I could have done the same in her place regardless.

Isn't that the rub she had already lost those friends (until they found a way to reverse the accident) it was certainly morally wrong and probably legally wrong as I said earlier Tuvix would appear to meet the criteria for a sentient being and as such entitled to all the protections that the UFP grants to sentient beings.
 
Surely Tuvix would technically be a civilian

That's debatable. Tuvix himself may not have personally gone through the Academy, but Tuvok did, and so it could be argued that for that reason alone, Tuvix qualifies as Starfleet.

Starfleet officers are supposed to protect civilians even at the cost of their own life.

The snag is, Tuvok isn't being given the choice to do so.

OTOH, if Tuvix qualifies as a Starfleet officer...couldn't he be obligated to give up his life so that Tuvok and Neelix could live?

One could possibly make a case that separating Tuvix would case more harm as you can you harm people who aren't there in body to harm?

Not allowing Tuvok and Neelix their own individual existences could certainly qualify as harm.

But from a legal point of view Janeway didn't have any business make a decision like that in which she was emotionally invested

I don't see Janeway as overtly emotional in this case. She is acting to protect two members of her crew. (Note the plural: TWO.) Which is entirely within her rights as captain.
 
I don't see Janeway as overtly emotional in this case. She is acting to protect two members of her crew. (Note the plural: TWO.) Which is entirely within her rights as captain.

If a judge or jury member knows any member of any party involved in a case they are supposed to recuse themselves from the case in order to maintain impartiality. Sure she has a duty to protect her crew from harm, but was there an immediate risk of harm occuring to Tuvok and/or Neelix?
 
If a judge or jury member knows any member of any party involved in a case they are supposed to recuse themselves from the case in order to maintain impartiality.

It's not anywhere near the same thing.

Janeway, as a starship captain, is by definition partial to anyone serving under her command - she can't be objective. A captain MUST act to protect their crew and passengers.

A judge must, as you say, be objective regarding anyone involved in a court case. But a captain cannot possibly do so regarding their crew.

Sure she has a duty to protect her crew from harm, but was there an immediate risk of harm occuring to Tuvok and/or Neelix?

As long as they remain separated, yes, there was.
 
That's debatable. Tuvix himself may not have personally gone through the Academy, but Tuvok did, and so it could be argued that for that reason alone, Tuvix qualifies as Starfleet.

He was wearing a Starfleet uniform with lieutenant insignia. That suggests that, for intents and purposes, he "inherited" Tuvok's rank and position.
 
Why so much lack of concern from the crew? Did they dislike Tuvix that much or was it because they wanted Tuvox and Neelix back that they couldn't careless if Tuvix died? I know it was Capt. Janeway's decision alone, but it doesn't seem like she got much resistance from the others expect from the Dr. Does this episode make her look like a tyrant?
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top