The slight uptick in the ratings is interesting. Typically, if this show were a flop as certain YouTubers liked to make it out to be, we would have seen the ratings drop like a brick... but it's not the case here.
They do.Its like they want to see Star Trek die.
This.They do.
I got so burned out on BermaTrek.They just want the franchise to return to the style that made it stagnant and irrelevant.
Indeed. I gave up on it.I got so burned out on BermaTrek.
At some point it will be considered a failure because they only made five movies before moving onto the blockbuster Captain Tilly franchise.Back in 1990, it was quite a breakthrough for TNG to exceed three seasons, which TOS failed to do. Once DISCO gets its fifth season, it exceeds ENTERPRISE.
After that happens, I look forward to how Midnight's Edge will spin DISCO as a failure. Will the goalpost be "if it doesn't reach seven seasons, it failed"? Or perhaps after it finishes with a seventh season the goal post will be moved to "Yeah, but it didn't reach 176 episodes, so FAIL".
I really don't understand people like this. It's fine not to like something, you don't need to spin it as an objectively bad failure to justify not liking it.After that happens, I look forward to how Midnight's Edge will spin DISCO as a failure.
I only started to notice the phrase "objective opinion" when THE LAST JEDI came out and broke a lot of fans. Ever since that film, it was no longer enough to just simply like or dislike something, you have to present your opinions as if they were factual and indisputable. It's a way to discourage discussion.I really don't understand people like this. It's fine not to like something, you don't need to spin it as an objectively bad failure to justify not liking it.
I only started to notice the phrase "objective opinion" when THE LAST JEDI came out and broke a lot of fans. Ever since that film, it was no longer enough to just simply like or dislike something, you have to present your opinions as if they were factual and indisputable. It's a way to discourage discussion.
The part of fandom I don't get.I only started to notice the phrase "objective opinion" when THE LAST JEDI came out and broke a lot of fans. Ever since that film, it was no longer enough to just simply like or dislike something, you have to present your opinions as if they were factual and indisputable. It's a way to discourage discussion.
Back in 1990, it was quite a breakthrough for TNG to exceed three seasons, which TOS failed to do. Once DISCO gets its fifth season, it exceeds ENTERPRISE.
After that happens, I look forward to how Midnight's Edge will spin DISCO as a failure. Will the goalpost be "if it doesn't reach seven seasons, it failed"? Or perhaps after it finishes with a seventh season the goal post will be moved to "Yeah, but it didn't reach 176 episodes, so FAIL".
It's cognitive dissonance, reality isn't reflecting what they believe. This is something that humans don't really deal with well, so either you change what you believe or just try to warp reality to fit your belief. For example, if you smoke cigarettes and learn that it's bad for you then you either quit smoking or find someway to rationalize why you're still doing it. For these people Discovery is the worst Trek and a complete failure. But it keeps getting renewed, getting spin-offs, and seems to fairly popular as far as Trek shows go. So instead of just realizing that it isn't for them and moving on, they create elaborate justifications to explain why it's terrible and a failure. Some have crafted an elaborate conspiracy where it's an attempt to destroy Star Trek itself.I really don't understand people like this. It's fine not to like something, you don't need to spin it as an objectively bad failure to justify not liking it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.