That is hilariousPerhaps. Even though I loved the show, the use of Shutterstock footage in the vision of the Admonition was bizarre.......

That is hilariousPerhaps. Even though I loved the show, the use of Shutterstock footage in the vision of the Admonition was bizarre.......
Why? Tv and film have used stock footage for such scenes for decades.Perhaps. Even though I loved the show, the use of Shutterstock footage in the vision of the Admonition was bizarre.......
Indeed, shows like the quite old "Time Tunnel" were made of sixty percent of stock footage. It was a show about time travel, so for each of their historical events, they would use clips from sometimes famous Hollywoodian movies.Why? Tv and film have used stock footage for such scenes for decades.
Now I wanna see Duke save the day next week XDI just realised the EDF seen on 32nd century Earth is from Duke Nukem. WTF?![]()
I just realised the EDF seen on 32nd century Earth is from Duke Nukem. WTF?![]()
Um...Oh OK........ Now I wonder how Duke would handle Osyraa and her goons
Um...
kill them all.
Picard was also supposed to be the most expensive Star Trek show ever made.
I have a feeling compensation for Patrick Stewart, Brent Spiner, Jeri Ryan, Avika Goldsman and Michael Chanbon ate a lot of that budget. Re-using CG from Discovery was pretty lame.
Yeah, they didn't figure bunch of Trekkies on some forum would catch on:Perhaps. Even though I loved the show, the use of Shutterstock footage in the vision of the Admonition was bizarre.......
So what was the deal with the Burn occurring a fraction of a microsecond apart in different places? How does that make sense in context of what we saw with the kid’s tantrum?
(Maybe I shouldn’t be looking for logic in this. But it was a major plot point.)
I think this is likely just another example of poor coordination between the writer's room and the VFX department, TBH.
But even if we set aside the (clearly contradictory) shockwave effect, was there any logic for why there would be an infinitesimal difference based on location?
Star Trek writers really have an issues with explosions and distance and light speed and etc...There is no logic for any wave traveling through space faster than light. And we have no idea what the maximum speed things can propagate through subspace.
I'm guessing it was such a small difference because the writers believed if it was any longer of a duration it would have been triangulated long ago. It is embarrassing they didn't remember the word picosecond exists though.
Star Trek writers really have an issues with explosions and distance and light speed and etc...
Of the top of my head... Veridian Star in GEN. Missile was launched from Veridian III, we see it hit the Star and seconds later it begins to dim. If Veridian is like our solar system, or close to it, it would take MINUTES for the explosion in the Star to be visible from a planet (without googling, IIRC Earth is 8-light minutes away from our Sun). Even if the missile went to warp as soon as it was launched, it would take many minutes to see any affect on the planet after it hit the start. Most likely you would see dimming and feel the shockwave at about the same time.
And that's just off the top of my head... There are likely very many other examples.
Hah, next you're going to mention artistic license and suspension of disbelief aren't you?Well, if that didn't happen we wouldn't have any drama...
…![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.